Search results

  1. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    What source would you accept as valid, sir? I'll try to find some
  2. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    This is the ignorance I'm talking about. Amazing, never fails to surprise me
  3. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    De jure, not de facto, man
  4. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    Are you a bot or something? What's with the links? Don't you know how the world works?
  5. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    USA and Russia, two most ignorant, pompous, self obsessed nations in the world. Naturally! Its people manifest in constantly. At least with the Americans you can have a conversation. With Russians it's even worse, nobody speaks a word of English, very moronic
  6. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    Nah, I'm against both of them. Just because 90% here are blindly on the other side, it makes me bring out counter arguments as well
  7. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    Where does it belong, on Mars? :p
  8. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    As we can see, it de facto isn't
  9. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    No, no, Russia is a competitor, Europe is its dependent ally. So, a same or similar opinion from another person in a form of an article would satisfy you?
  10. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    No, it isn't
  11. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    And then Russia would send nukes, America would promptly respond the same way, and the end
  12. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    I can't provide any article in particular, that's common sense. It is natural for any power to aim for destabilization of their competitors and dependence of their allies on them
  13. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    Who says it's a good thing? :)
  14. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    US is the greatest power at the moment, and they look forward to Russian attacks, to further weaken it and destabilize Europe. They are not crazy to get involved though, neither does Putin want for his operation to last longer than absolutely necessary. It will be short and precise. "Going to...
  15. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    I see that the votes for NATO involvement are slowly getting outnumbered. Good. For those who support it: do you realize that the world will end if the clash happens? It's clear that in the past 80 years, war between the west and Russia is impossible. Military doctrine of both sides implies the...
  16. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    A barking dog never bites. After many years, a president that didn't start any war. Great guy.
  17. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    Bashar never called you in the first place, neither did Milosevic, Gaddafi, Saddam... All, at the time, members of the legitimate governments of their countries. Oh wait, you decide who is legitimate as you don't give a fuck about UN or international law. And no, Putin wouldn't leave, as Russia...
  18. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    "in case of attack", love it. You should get couple of those on the moon, you never know :D. However, many of the "dots" on this map came to be after invasions, so it at least partially helps the argument.
  19. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    Well obviously. But as you mentioned in another post, nothing is black and white. You don't leave any space for a possibility of the same outcome achieved by different strategy. Air strikes had already destroyed enough. Paired with Soviets (who played more than important role, which many fail to...
  20. D

    Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

    So they dropped it to help Japs, it was practically aid :) joke aside, I was shocked to find out when I talked to locals how grateful they are for the bombing as, quote: "it made them humble". Sick people, but I can't help but still admire it in a way
Top