1 Billion Dollars Hacked?

UncleBuck said:
i like that you asked someone smarter than you, since you are clearly not bright enough to do a google search. that seems to be your style though, going through life dimmer than a burnt out bulb, no use for facts, or spelling, or science, or anything else that would be remotely useful to even the most marginally intelligent human beings.

you should hire a mexican school kid to speak for you, you would gain at least 25 intelligence quotient points and would be less hindered by the overwhelming amount of hateful bigotry you possess.

that is my advice to you.
Click to expand...

Buck.

Back in 2008 I turned 7500.00 into over 100k with my knowledge of banks so I really don't need to google much about the bank crash. just so you know.
 
King Arthur said:
I am still failing to see how 1 billion doesn't matter. Not saying it is something that couldn't have been predicted but it is pretty big for stealing from banks. Usually it is stealing from the people.
Click to expand...

Ok, let me try to explain. Say you went around and collected $3 dollars from everyone in your neighborhood, setting aside the legality of it, and at the end of the year you had $33. Let's say then, one of your neighbors decided to "steal" $1 dollar from you. Would you cry about it?

Edit: $33, not $32. When using this example, I should try to get my math right.
 
Last edited:
see4 said:
Ok, let me try to explain. Say you went around and collected $3 dollars from everyone in your neighborhood, setting aside the legality of it, and at the end of the year you had $32. Let's say then, one of your neighbors decided to "steal" $1 dollar from you. Would you cry about it?
Click to expand...

Hmm....I didn't realize we were talking pocket change.
 
heckler73 said:
.
FFS Rummy snuck away with $2Tn the day before 2001/09/11. Did anyone find that money? Did anyone care? :lol:
Click to expand...
I thought Rumsfeld was saying that they hadn't accounted for $2Trillion, not that $2 Trillion was lost, it wasn't. they just couldn't account for $2 Trillion that was spent. In other words, records of purchases or expenses were paid out, but not properly invoiced and or accounted for. He alluded to military expenditures and the pentagon bureaucracy being at fault. "According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." -Ole Rumhead
 
NoDrama said:
I thought Rumsfeld was saying that they hadn't accounted for $2Trillion, not that $2 Trillion was lost, it wasn't. they just couldn't account for $2 Trillion that was spent. In other words, records of purchases or expenses were paid out, but not properly invoiced and or accounted for. He alluded to military expenditures and the pentagon bureaucracy being at fault. "According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." -Ole Rumhead
Click to expand...

Right. The Secretary of State couldn't figure out what happened to $2,000,000,000,000. He snuck away with it. Spent it on military contracts, which undoubtably he had his hand in.

My opinion of course.
 
NoDrama said:
I thought Rumsfeld was saying that they hadn't accounted for $2Trillion, not that $2 Trillion was lost, it wasn't. they just couldn't account for $2 Trillion that was spent. In other words, records of purchases or expenses were paid out, but not properly invoiced and or accounted for. He alluded to military expenditures and the pentagon bureaucracy being at fault. "According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." -Ole Rumhead
Click to expand...
Admittedly, I was stretching the analogy, but not the point. $1Bn amidst the $2.3Tn could also disappear, and as far as I know there is no evidence to the contrary.
What evidence there was also disappeared, for the most part, so that makes the book-cooking trivial.

 
heckler73 said:
Admittedly, I was stretching the analogy, but not the point. $1Bn amidst the $2.3Tn could also disappear, and as far as I know there is no evidence to the contrary.
What evidence there was also disappeared, for the most part, so that makes the book-cooking trivial.

Click to expand...
Yes it is an unfortunate event that all of the evidence for the missing money was stored in WTC building 7. Which fell into its own footprint after a fire started.
 
NoDrama said:
Yes it is an unfortunate event that all of the evidence for the missing money was stored in WTC building 7. Which fell into its own footprint after a fire started.
Click to expand...


Tr00f

tin-foil.jpg


v0tE 4 rAwN pAwL 2016 - 4eVaH!!!!!
 
A billion dollars?

Lol, you's owe trillions, it's like owing someone $1400 and wondering where that single dollar went.
 
UncleBuck said:
i like that you asked someone smarter than you, since you are clearly not bright enough to do a google search. that seems to be your style though, going through life dimmer than a burnt out bulb, no use for facts, or spelling, or science, or anything else that would be remotely useful to even the most marginally intelligent human beings.

you should hire a mexican school kid to speak for you, you would gain at least 25 intelligence quotient points and would be less hindered by the overwhelming amount of hateful bigotry you possess.

that is my advice to you.
Click to expand...
The generosity of UR crtiique overwhelmes..
 
How foolish to think the Secretary can benefit personally from the defense budget.

He was expressing concern that the money was obviously spent across the board in nickels and dimes, but at accounting time, the numbers don't add up.

You are missing one dollar out of 18,000 dollars.
 
Last edited:
It is the same thing about the national debt.

Compare it to GDP and find it is a better debt to income ratio than most families.

Now add to the fact, we don't owe most of that money to anyone but ourselves, in detail.

If you just look at foreign debt, sure it sounds like a big number at the kitchen table but as
a debt to income ratio, it is seriously nothing.
 
Doer said:
It is the same thing about the national debt.

Compare it to GDP and find it is a better debt to income ratio than most families.

Now add to the fact, we don't owe most of that money to anyone but ourselves, in detail.

If you just look at foreign debt, sure it sounds like a big number at the kitchen table but as
a debt to income ratio, it is seriously nothing.
Click to expand...
Isn't your national debt either at or close to 100% of GDP?

That coupled with an endless deficit and shitty growth is not the rosey path you make it out to be.

As for owing most of the money to yourselves, you owe it to the Federal Reserve (a semi-private organisation) and if you failed to repay any of it your debt would be reduced below investment grade and your currency would unravel.

It's rarely (if ever) as simple as declaring "self-rule" and getting an automatic victory.
 
Doer said:
How foolish to think the Secretary can benefit personally from the defense budget.

He was expressing concern that the money was obviously spent across the board in nickels and dimes, but at accounting time, the numbers don't add up.

You are missing one dollar out of 18,000 dollars.
Click to expand...

You might be slightly retarded. No, no.. you definitely are fully fucking retarded.

Let me try to understand your point of view on this.... You think, that some poor schmo, that say; has 2% stake in a business that pulls in $10,000,000,000 a year in government contracts will not see any return in this endeavor ? Is that what you are saying here? Are you saying the Federal Defense budget does not appropriate hundreds of millions if not billions in commercial contracts? And that stakeholders in said commercial contracting companies do not benefit from said contract? Please tell us that is not the basis for your argument. God, please tell me that's not the case.

And if it isn't, please rephrase your comment to something I can understand.

Best wishes,
see4
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top