abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Thanks for not trying.
2014 was definitely the hottest year on record
- Thread starter abandonconflict
- Start date
Wavels
Well-Known Member
It's the same article...see, you did not read one word...hahaha
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Sounds like we are in agreement then.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I don't give a rat's ass what Forbes publishes, ya dingus.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
You can`t pick and choose,.....unless you want us to as well,...caged..............
Wavels
Well-Known Member
How analytical and objective...
Thanks for playing guys.
That's science.
Hhahaa
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
We don`t have to give a shit what you cite either,....I heard that slap from Boston.............
Rrog
Well-Known Member
Hhahaa
pnwmystery
Well-Known Member
pnwmystery
Well-Known Member
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/27/12107.abstract
William R. L. Anderegga,1, James W. Prallb, Jacob Haroldc, and Stephen H. Schneidera,d,1
Although preliminary estimates from published literature and expert surveys suggest striking agreement among climate scientists on the tenets of anthropogenic climate change (ACC), the American public expresses substantial doubt about both the anthropogenic cause and the level of scientific agreement underpinning ACC. A broad analysis of the climate scientist community itself, the distribution of credibility of dissenting researchers relative to agreeing researchers, and the level of agreement among top climate experts has not been conducted and would inform future ACC discussions. Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
Oooops, looks like the per reviewed studies are in, and they're saying climate change is real.
William R. L. Anderegga,1, James W. Prallb, Jacob Haroldc, and Stephen H. Schneidera,d,1
Although preliminary estimates from published literature and expert surveys suggest striking agreement among climate scientists on the tenets of anthropogenic climate change (ACC), the American public expresses substantial doubt about both the anthropogenic cause and the level of scientific agreement underpinning ACC. A broad analysis of the climate scientist community itself, the distribution of credibility of dissenting researchers relative to agreeing researchers, and the level of agreement among top climate experts has not been conducted and would inform future ACC discussions. Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
Oooops, looks like the per reviewed studies are in, and they're saying climate change is real.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
^there's even a peer reviewed study regarding the content of the peer reviewed studies on the subject^
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
99% of Doctors told a nurse she was cured once upon a time in Texas.............
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
The issue is real, everyone knows it,....The damage and severity of it is what`s at question,....the surety of it has nothing to be compared to,....
How many deaths so far ?? How much is needed ?? Who do we write the checks out to ??
Are you scared yet,......??
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
The more hurricane`s didn`t happen,...season`s almost over,...take these scientists with a grain of salt.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
OK, thanks. I will trust what you say and take these scientists with a grain of salt.
By the way, were you going to link a peer reviewed study that contradicts AGW?
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Don`t want to, they don`t exist because everyone knows the issue is real, it`s just not as bad as they cry. Ebola was cured for a nurse,...but ...so when science says jump,....think twice.
Similar threads
