theexpress
Well-Known Member
better then anything they had in the 60's.... bet money... and thanx.....All I can say is I say a super dank bud in a picture posted earlier. very frosty, mmmm
better then anything they had in the 60's.... bet money... and thanx.....All I can say is I say a super dank bud in a picture posted earlier. very frosty, mmmm
matter of fact it may remind you of the 70's some cuzz trust me theese nuggets shine like little disco globes!!!sourkush!!!!!!!!! this cross was made by me in 2001...... the hippie/disco era didnt have shit like this.....
point is, you cant understand. Walk in someone elses shoes for a while.Originally Posted by theexpress
i wasnt even born untill the 80's lolol.... i smoked those strains in the 90's that was the last time they were available... my dudes brother would go down to el paso texas back in those days and drive up 30-40 kilos of shit at a time...... like i said most of it was mexican, but columbian shit still came up thre latin america and mexico to.... shit was cheap has fuck 400 bux a pound, and dudes brother was making something selling it for that much....... some of it was heavily seeded, some of it had lil to no seeds... some were lightly bricked, while others were bricked harder then a rock.... some of them were much better then others....... when the brand name shit came threw we knew it, we knew what it was and we did ask for it by name... cuzz you see at that point and time i didnt know what dank was... but now that i do.... let me tell you that all those strains you and i both mentioned were not dank!!!!!!
dood u need to get off ur own nuts. i understand ur proud and shit but u basically over took homedudes thread with pics of a strain u made TEN years ago. dont get me wrong it looks great. but have some respect big shot.sourkush!!!!!!!!! this cross was made by me in 2001...... the hippie/disco era didnt have shit like this.....
sourkush!!!!!!!!! this cross was made by me in 2001...... the hippie/disco era didnt have shit like this....
lol keep smoking ur schwagg old man....... thats all....... anybody who agree's with you is eaither your age, or just stupid..... go find some pure columbian gold and grow it out and try to get 60 bux an 1/8 and watch how fast you get laughed at!!!!!!!! whil i can get 400 bux all day an oz for the bud i just showed.......Thank God we didn't, at least those of us from the true "hippie era," would say that, and we consider ourselves to have been blessed that we didn't have to settle for strains like that.
But no wonder you go on and on so much about this ... you created a mutt of your own and your ego forces you to proclaim what you did absolutely has too be vastly superior to what thousands and thousands and thousands of year of evolution or an all powerful all knowing God or Yahweh or intelligent design or Mother Nature or whatever someone believes in could possibly ever have achieved.
Talk about the epitome of arrogance and self importance!
You inaccurately claimed that the best strains from the 60's and 70's were low grade. Now you claim I grow; "schwagg." I can see why you might make the inaccurate claims about the best strains of the 60's and the 70's, because you were never lucky enough to experience them, to purchase them and smoke them and then to grow them yourself and smoke them. But how can you justify calling what I grow today as being; "schwagg?" Do you think I have a secret stash of beans from the 60's and 70's or that I have Mr. Peabody's Wayback Machine and I jump back in time now and then to pick up fresh seeds from the 60's and the 70's?lol keep smoking ur schwagg old man....... thats all....... anybody who agree's with you is eaither your age, or just stupid..... go find some pure columbian gold and grow it out and try to get 60 bux an 1/8 and watch how fast you get laughed at!!!!!!!! whil i can get 400 bux all day an oz for the bud i just showed.......
25$ grams all day and people are dieing for them!!!
dont we still have pure sativas today?dude i laugh at express 10 bucks says this kid isnt even old enough to be on the forum
ITS A WELL KNOWN FACT
Pure Sativa's from back in the day had the most unique profile buzz's
More prevalent to the mind trip, race car ride, omg where am i highs
now when indicas were brought in they were bred into the sativa's it was done for many reasons
to raid the cbd values to influence a more body numming high , in attempts to raise yield, and alot of the times by accident
to many ppl its still controversy wether it was a smart thing to do or not
i still say it was DUMB
Remember Its not the amount of trichromes is what in them that changes the game seperates the men from the little boys
columbian red tip, or columbian red, or some other names was about the most 'sativa' sativa there wasHello, just tried to reply to this thread. Must have done something wrong. Anyhow, I was in Columbia in the early 70's. We traved into the mountains and at one of the small villages we bought what was called "Pinta Roja" or Red Point. This was Columbian Red I believe, and from what my reseach suggested, Indica. This pot was very,very good. You have, as you said Columbian Gold. This plant is Sativa. If you get a chance, read DJ Shorts book "Cultivating Exceptional Canabis" p.77, chater "The Heritabe Strains." For a breeder like DJ Short, this plant would truely be GOLD. You might want this plant to be a female. Then you can clone her and have excellant smoke. I'm not a breeder, but male or female, don't let her get away. If you live in Ca. I would love to have a clone if female and would reward you for that! Best of luck with your GOLD. Gene 3262
finally somebody with some sense....... your last two post i mostly agree with....columbian red tip, or columbian red, or some other names was about the most 'sativa' sativa there was
that was my favorite columbian bagweed back in the day(while it was around)
i did actually grow some in upstate NY, though its flowering was not too much
but indica? that it was not - sativa hard and strong