unimpressed. beginning to think the 'white led' wave is a noob trap. did NASA pick white LED's because they were the most optimal for photosynthesis or because that's what the human eye is most adjusted to? those buds are tiny, you could get better with an HPS, and HPS aren't particularly well-adapted to plant specific spectrums by any means.
I believe white light is only needed for the tiny, tiny, extremely tiny amounts of green and yellow light that plants need but growing primarily with it you might as well be flushing lumens right down the fucking drain for all the good they're doing.
Nah, white is more of a stopgap than a noob trap IMO. Monos performance is just not there yet and whites really help in providing marijuana with an efficient light source, (with the bonus of some "broadness" to the light source), which MMJ loves. So in a way white LED growing is akin to HPS growing, though I think of phosphor based white LED growing as super high performance CFL growing. And NASA is a bad example since they make decisions based on other factors than a home grower would. They gotta conserve energy and there is stuff like weight and I'm sure a hundred other things which I don't have a clue about. I may be spaced out but I'm no space man
!
The problems with whites is too many people just assume the white they got is made with a tech that will grow plants efficiently. Whites need to be chosen correctly, otherwise you are pissing away lumens like you said. Some whites are just better than others.
Personally I like both, but like using less white in flowering than others like to. And that's the thing. It's personal preference. There is no right and wrong way like some tool-bags on this site like to say. Lotsa grey if ya know what I mean.
Peace AA