You're correct, mother nature doesn't have wants, it has laws, which of whom one with an open mind would comprehend quiet clearly. "Wants" and laws of nature are one in the same, and you can manipulate that terminology all you want, it has no bearing on the way in which mother nature works. Nature's laws obligate a forced system of socialism to collapse. In essence, one could say that this means nature does not "want" such a system to prevail, because nature itself will defeat the system before it's birth, which completely disables it's ability to prevail. If such a system prevails it's due to human circumvention and/or corruption of the natural process that's defeating it.
You telling others they have logical fallacies? That's funny, being that you believe in socialistic ideas, based strictly off a foundation of self-determined morals, without your own due diligence in the mathematical parameters regarding such destined-to-fail theories, and their natural obligation to collapse. The only one with a logical fallacy here is you. Socialism on a general basis, is a logical fallacy, as it mathematically defeats itself. Math is a law a nature, and as such will obligate the failure of such systems as I've mentioned before. Deny this as you please, but nature is smarter than you or I.
Those who do not retain and/or possess the ability of self-responsibility or self-sustainability, will die righteously and justifiably at the mercy of nature. My view on that hasn't changed. You can retain your ignorant belief that the justified death of one's self via natural processes, is somehow joyful on my behalf, which of I've never stated. Nothing about death of another is joyful, yet in some circumstances it can be absolutely warranted via the laws of nature and her root-bound laws.
This is how the world works. You can stand for a mathematical fallacy all day, but you've done nothing other than deny nature and the laws in which she obligates this reality and it's inhabitants to.
