And So The Hysterical Bullshit Starts Again

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
i can find every bit as much violence in the bible, even the new testament has its questionable sections.
Not a fan of the bible either. But there is a difference. In America if a radical christian group like the kkk gets out of hand, other christians oppose them and bring them to justice for their crimes. When Islamic extremists get out of hand, muslims do nothing to stop them.

When Pat Robertson instructs his followers to strap on a suicide bomb and blow up a shopping center in Tehran then they might be comparable. Right now they are not.

no, not a bigot. perhaps a bit misguided, perhaps ignorant of the vast majority of muslims who wish you and i no harm and simply want to worship peacefully.

i wouldn't quite say bigoted in your case, but close enough.
How come these "peaceful muslims" only oppose these terrorists publicly? How come Bin Laden can live for 6 years in a muslim neighborhood and none of them turn in this mass murderer? How come Saudi religious institutions renounce terrorism publicly then hold telethons to raise money for the families of suicide bombers?

When Islamic institutions decide to actually do something to reign in terrorism then I'll buy this whole "simply want to worship peacefully" act. But right now it's all bullshit. They say one thing publicly, do another privately.

I know not all muslims are terrorists, but pretty much all people who hijack planes are muslims and the muslim community does nothing to reign in the radical element among them.
 

Ernst

Well-Known Member
"if we are going to discriminate, then i want to see EVERYONE discriminated against, including that 6 year old that jeffers keeps mentioning. you think a terrorist would have the moral distinction to not plant a bomb within a child?

want an example of a country that does it right? go fly to israel. tell me how secure you feel on the flight back. they do that shit right, they trust NO ONE and question EVERYONE. they don't discriminate based on attire, they discriminate based on tics, twitches and tells. sideways glances, nervous gulps, you name it. "


We'll be there soon enough, and to anyone who allows that to happen just keep in mind you asked for it when they want to cavity search your 6 year old daughters etc just because they looked scared or something.
Is not a poisoned mind just as evil?
 

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
You mean like weed smokers?!
Weed smokers aren't hijacking airplanes.

Look, if protocal was followed, and they were cleared to fly like everyone else, then wtf. I'm not talking about racism. It's discrimination, plain and simple.
Why is all discrimination bad? Racial discrimination is wrong because you are discriminating against someone for something beyond their control. Being a muslim is a choice. Why is it wrong to discriminate against someone for a choice they make?
 

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
I still want to hear answers to the following questions:

Why is it wrong to discriminate against someone for the choices they make?

How many people here who are against discriminating against muslims on airplanes would let a random catholic priest babysit their kids?
 

Dizzle Frost

Well-Known Member
So for-profit dismisses liability?
As much as i hate to admit it..yes...in the current world we live. Its too messed up to sit back and believe theres a peaceful solution to things. Sometime men do evil to obtain good, and most of those men are willing to die for his fellow country man no matter hat they belive in. And for a paycheck lol
 

Luger187

Well-Known Member
Weed smokers aren't hijacking airplanes.



Why is all discrimination bad? Racial discrimination is wrong because you are discriminating against someone for something beyond their control. Being a muslim is a choice. Why is it wrong to discriminate against someone for a choice they make?
what if a pothead with long hair hijacked an airplane and flew it into a building? would u feel discriminated against when u go to fly, and they dont let u on because u have long hair or look like a guy that smokes weed? and then u go through security AGAIN, only to prove AGAIN that u have nothing dangerous, and pose no threat. but still, they do not let u on

would u say "i deserve this because i smoke weed"?
 

Girdweed

Well-Known Member
And for a paycheck lol
I wouldn't have spent years in the military if the compensation wasn't enough to purchase a home, automobiles, and an airplane or two. The paycheck isn't the driving cause but we wouldn't do what we do (or did, in my case) if we had to be independently wealthy prior to service.

Warfare is not a philanthropic endeavor.
 

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
what if a pothead with long hair hijacked an airplane and flew it into a building? would u feel discriminated against when u go to fly, and they dont let u on because u have long hair or look like a guy that smokes weed? and then u go through security AGAIN, only to prove AGAIN that u have nothing dangerous, and pose no threat. but still, they do not let u on

would u say "i deserve this because i smoke weed"?
If potheads had a 40 year history of hijacking airplanes, I would expect them to go through extra security measures before entering an airplane.

Sure, not letting muslims on an airplane at all is going too far. But I hope they all get discriminated against during airport security, giving them all the extra testing.
 

Dizzle Frost

Well-Known Member
I still want to hear answers to the following questions:

Why is it wrong to discriminate against someone for the choices they make?

How many people here who are against discriminating against muslims on airplanes would let a catholic priest babysit their kids?
Its not wrong to descriminate..if that was the case we would have no standards.

I wouldnt let a muslim or a priest watch my kids...i dont let my kids go with people i dont trust period. At the end of the day , if i cant even keep my kids safe..then its a fail. Hence discrimination is required in some cases..and im not refering to rascism or nazi KKK bs...id happily hunt them for a paycheck to. I can count on one hand how many people i trust with mine and my kids lives....3
 

Luger187

Well-Known Member
If potheads had a 40 year history of hijacking airplanes, I would expect them to go through extra security measures before entering an airplane.

Sure, not letting muslims on an airplane at all is going too far. But I hope they all get discriminated against during airport security, giving them all the extra testing.
just a thought... why not check everyone good enough to make sure nobody has anything? not just muslims. like buck said, they could easily figure out that all they need to do is find a white muslim that is willing. then if he dresses in a suit and tie, he would go right past security. VERY obvious flaw in that system
 

Dizzle Frost

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't have spent years in the military if the compensation wasn't enough to purchase a home, automobiles, and an airplane or two. The paycheck isn't the driving cause but we wouldn't do what we do (or did, in my case) if we had to be independently wealthy prior to service.

Warfare is not a philanthropic endeavor.
Well put...

war is war...nothing more nothingless.
 

Ernst

Well-Known Member
As much as i hate to admit it..yes...in the current world we live. Its too messed up to sit back and believe theres a peaceful solution to things. Sometime men do evil to obtain good, and most of those men are willing to die for his fellow country man no matter hat they belive in. And for a paycheck lol
It is called Disjoint. That is what I have learned lately.
 

toastycookies

Active Member
just throwing this out there as a hypothetical kind of thing, it makes sense to me but i may just be thinking dumb. anywho... what if making the passengers uncomfortable and getting thrown off the plane was part of some kind of plan these two had from the beginning? they were headed to a big gathering dedicated to "Islamophobia or fears of Islam and discrimination against American Muslims". what better of a story than to have something directly related to this happen en route to the conference?

again, this is just a thought that popped into my head and is completely hypothetical with NO factual backing WHATSOEVER.
 

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
just a thought... why not check everyone good enough to make sure nobody has anything? not just muslims. like buck said, they could easily figure out that all they need to do is find a white muslim that is willing. then if he dresses in a suit and tie, he would go right past security. VERY obvious flaw in that system
We do that already. Why not flag people for extra checks based on them being muslim?

I'm tired of pretending this isn't a muslim problem, it is one. If an abortion clinic gets bombed, first place I'll look is fundamentalist christians. When it comes to airplane hijacking, muslims are doing it.
 

Dizzle Frost

Well-Known Member
just throwing this out there as a hypothetical kind of thing, it makes sense to me but i may just be thinking dumb. anywho... what if making the passengers uncomfortable and getting thrown off the plane was part of some kind of plan these two had from the beginning? they were headed to a big gathering dedicated to "Islamophobia or fears of Islam and discrimination against American Muslims". what better of a story than to have something directly related to this happen en route to the conference?

again, this is just a thought that popped into my head and is completely hypothetical with NO factual backing WHATSOEVER.
those bastards! i knew it!

for reals tho..thats possible i guess
 

Luger187

Well-Known Member
We do that already. Why not flag people for extra checks based on them being muslim?

I'm tired of pretending this isn't a muslim problem, it is one. If an abortion clinic gets bombed, first place I'll look is fundamentalist christians. When it comes to airplane hijacking, muslims are doing it.
if those original tests arent good enough for muslims, what kind of secret pocket do they have that i dont? if the original search didnt find the muslim's bomb, how can we be sure we are checking the other people good enough? whats the need for the extra search, if the first search was good enough to find anything?

edit: to inconvenience them maybe? lol
 

Dizzle Frost

Well-Known Member
if those original tests arent good enough for muslims, what kind of secret pocket do they have that i dont? if the original search didnt find the muslim's bomb, how can we be sure we are checking the other people good enough? whats the need for the extra search, if the first search was good enough to find anything?
Ill let you guys on a lil secret...the fun loving muslim that says hi to you every day in iraq or afghanistan is poorer thana mofo....the same dude you give food to and his kids chocolate will take a $20 bill one day and kill you and your buddies. So how do you really tell who is good here? You dont..so you just up the standards.
 
Top