whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
Matter of fact I'm fixing to do a 864 watt t5 vertical grow.
The advantage to growing vertical is omnidirectional lights(aka bare bulb HID lights with no reflector so you can grow in a circle around them), are your t5's omnidirectional?Matter of fact I'm fixing to do a 864 watt t5 vertical grow.
COB lights seem to be coming along nicely , couple more generations and they should be the best on the market in my opinion, right now a good DE or quality HPS gets my nod. Check these COB's out they pretty nice they are made by a forum member.@whitebb2727 I don't doubt T5's ability to produce flowers, but I went to hell n' back experimenting with various set ups and nothing produces the quality that HID does. Duel ended is another story though, I think that is a step too far and haven't seen it produce the level of quality that a single ended 1kW digi. Those DE's will eek out the last bit of weight to be found in the plant, but for that, I believe quality suffers a bit. That, or it could be the paclo that everyone is using f'ing the buds up just that much more due to the extra light/heat. Not to excited about DE and don't want to change my entire set up for what "might" be better light for the plant. I'm sure that more efficient, higher quality, lights are in development as we speak.
Different strokes for different folks. You enjoy growing your plants, you enjoy smoking your own product, that's all that really matters.
There is no way hid is the same quality as what t5 can produce.@whitebb2727 I don't doubt T5's ability to produce flowers, but I went to hell n' back experimenting with various set ups and nothing produces the quality that HID does. Duel ended is another story though, I think that is a step too far and haven't seen it produce the level of quality that a single ended 1kW digi. Those DE's will eek out the last bit of weight to be found in the plant, but for that, I believe quality suffers a bit. That, or it could be the paclo that everyone is using f'ing the buds up just that much more due to the extra light/heat. Not too excited about DE and don't want to change my entire set up for what "might" be better light for the plant. I'm sure that more efficient, higher quality, lights are in development as we speak.
Different strokes for different folks. You enjoy growing your plants, you enjoy smoking your own product, that's all that really matters.
I agree that cob is the future.COB lights seem to be coming along nicely , couple more generations and they should be the best on the market in my opinion, right now a good DE or quality HPS gets my nod. Check these COB's out they pretty nice they are made by a forum member.
http://www.pacificlightconcepts.com/product/cx300/
http://www.tastyled.com/default.asp
Pics to prove it? Another thing, T5's won't develope the terpenes on the level that HID will. The complexity of the nose, flavors, and high are greater with HID, not to mention the bud structure and trichome development.There is no way hid is the same quality as what t5 can produce.
This assumption is incorrect.The advantage to growing vertical is omnidirectional lights(aka bare bulb HID lights with no reflector so you can grow in a circle around them), are your t5's omnidirectional?
Sorry, I beg to differ a tad T5's do a very good jobPics to prove it? Another thing, T5's won't develope the terpenes on the level that HID will. The complexity of the nose, flavors, and high are greater with HID, not to mention the bud structure and trichome development.
I'm not knocking T5's by any means, but they just can't produce buds on the same level as HID.
I split the difference between HPS and COB LED by going with 860W CDM lamps. Spectrum and quality got better, yield did not.Pics to prove it? Another thing, T5's won't develope the terpenes on the level that HID will. The complexity of the nose, flavors, and high are greater with HID, not to mention the bud structure and trichome development.
I'm not knocking T5's by any means, but they just can't produce buds on the same level as HID.
My pics are all over the place. I am in a place where I'm not getting full signal on my phone.Pics to prove it? Another thing, T5's won't develope the terpenes on the level that HID will. The complexity of the nose, flavors, and high are greater with HID, not to mention the bud structure and trichome development.
I'm not knocking T5's by any means, but they just can't produce buds on the same level as HID.
Exactly.i run hps start to finish..
but thats not because it gives me the best bud..
What?Pics to prove it? Another thing, T5's won't develope the terpenes on the level that HID will. The complexity of the nose, flavors, and high are greater with HID, not to mention the bud structure and trichome development.
I'm not knocking T5's by any means, but they just can't produce buds on the same level as HID.
Sure some have actually tested around there but I have a feeling there's a ceiling and it's being reached. THC % varies among certain spots on a SINGLE plant let alone a certain variety of them.
I don't put much stock into %'s. It's good or it's not. Type of high matters too - I'll take a trippier 15% Sativa over a 30% indica any day. No ones more passionate about MJ than me don't get me wrong but I think some people look too hard into the numbers..