abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
yeah, since Romney is impossible to defend, assault Obama.
Assuming Romney will win the Nomination
- Thread starter abandonconflict
- Start date
yeah, since Romney is impossible to defend, assault Obama.
dkmf1
Member
Yep....we're fucked!!!!!!
canndo
Well-Known Member
On the one hand no one wants government to "run their lives" but it seems that everyone wants the president to give them a job.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Nobody needs to assault Obama, they simply need to point out his miserable record...
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
defend rmoney...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he has great hair and no one has ever asked to see his birth certificate!
get it? it's a joke! no one ever implicated him in a borderline racist conspiracy theory because he's white! that's funny!
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Seriously sports a mean pair of mom jeans too I hear.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I agree with you Romney has little merit. I guess because Obama may be "less evil" I'm supposed to get a boner over the prospects of him being President? Obama's DEA storm troopers are the ones doing the assaulting by the way.
canndo
Well-Known Member
mr2shim
Well-Known Member
By that do you mean quote flat out lies fabricated by Fox News, mittens, and Rush?
Example: Obama has doubled the debt since 2008!
Oh right, lie. A lie I seen Mittens say live on tv yesterday.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Nope "nobody" wants government to run THEIR lives. They just want to use government to run other peoples lives.
I don't think the President can "create jobs" that actually produce anything. I won't be asking either dickwad for a job.
canndo
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
You use the word "order" as if it is always a good thing. The kind of order I favor is the kind where I am free to do as I chose and you are too as long as we leave each other alone. What kind of "order" do you favor?
canndo
Well-Known Member
It is the intersection between what you are "free to do" and what I am "free to do". I think that you will find that the intersection is crossed more often then you might imagine. Now who would be appropriate to defend you from those who would seek not to "leave you alone"? That protection is the basis of order and that protection is most often government.
mr2shim
Well-Known Member
That sounds like a nice way of saying humans are too stupid for their own good so they need to be ruled. If so, I agree.
canndo
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Turn the question around....Who would be the most likely to take away your freedom, kill people abroad and jail peaceful people? hmmmm.
There are alternatives.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Of course you exempt yourself from this "rule" ? Why not support a world where people that leave others alone are left alone? Why should anybody "rule" somebody else ?
canndo
Well-Known Member
There are consequences in affording power to the few. Turn it around as you like, but you don't seem capable of an answer. you wish for everyone to be free to do as they please so long as they don't infringe on other's right to do the same, and yet it is the nature of man to infringe upon others. Who would you have defend you from those who would seek to infringe upon you?
mr2shim
Well-Known Member
I do support a world where we leave each other alone. But not everyone can and will do that. Your idea is good in theory but in reality it's not so great.
Similar threads
