Aeroknow
Well-Known Member
Who fucking knows dude. Maybe a dipshit white guy who started a bunch of accounts over the years?I've had the same account since 2013 that's one incredible sleeper sock.
Prove you're black. I'm seriously doubting it
Who fucking knows dude. Maybe a dipshit white guy who started a bunch of accounts over the years?I've had the same account since 2013 that's one incredible sleeper sock.
sheskunk.I've had the same account since 2013 that's one incredible sleeper sock.
7-1/4" is not black cock status. Just sayin. It's me. I'm a white boyWhat makes you think I'm pissed? Are you Bucks war sock?
I'm also 7"1/4 not exactly an anaconda but it gets the job done.
You're super close to me banning you. One more shitty post dudeLet`s talk about fake. I was banned for nothing last time I stopped here. Came back just2 show how stupid Mr.Buck thinks people are.
Take the chart you hold dear as facts. They are facts. Can not deny it. But, the chart is useless because it does not list the more than 50 statements taken from each Candidate since 2007 by PolitiFact.
Example of how it is facts but misleading information to use as props:
The more than 50 statements taken by PolitiFact since 2007 from Trump were about Trump stating things about his taxes.
The more than 50 statements taken by PolitiFact since 2007 from Clinton were about her clothes.
So PolitiFact makes Trump the biggest liar on the chart, and Clinton the most honest. (Grade school tactics)
Without the statements next to each Candidate, the chart states facts, but is very misleading. Apparently, you bought into to it. I do not for reasons stated.
So, facts they are, but worthless facts they are as well. No credence.
OK moderators,...you can ban me again for being smarter than Mr. Buck. I wont mind.
Am I supposed to care ?
the claims they fact checked are listed though.Let`s talk about fake. I was banned for nothing last time I stopped here. Came back just2 show how stupid Mr.Buck thinks people are.
Take the chart you hold dear as facts. They are facts. Can not deny it. But, the chart is useless because it does not list the more than 50 statements taken from each Candidate since 2007 by PolitiFact.
Example of how it is facts but misleading information to use as props:
The more than 50 statements taken by PolitiFact since 2007 from Trump were about Trump stating things about his taxes.
The more than 50 statements taken by PolitiFact since 2007 from Clinton were about her clothes.
So PolitiFact makes Trump the biggest liar on the chart, and Clinton the most honest. (Grade school tactics)
Without the statements next to each Candidate, the chart states facts, but is very misleading. Apparently, you bought into to it. I do not for reasons stated.
So, facts they are, but worthless facts they are as well. No credence.
OK moderators,...you can ban me again for being smarter than Mr. Buck. I wont mind.
or the ones who deny the existence of the holocaust. ya know, neo-nazis shitbags like you.Yeah I think Uncle Buck is Sunni's girlfriend or something. Only people who seem to get banned butt hurt Uncle Buck.
Can't we at least agree politicians are all blood thirsty lying pricks (cunts for female politicians so not to be sexist)?the claims they fact checked are listed though.
LULZ
i can agree that you are a tiny-dicked, cowardly, white loser.Can't we at least agree politicians are all blood thirsty lying pricks (cunts for female politicians so not to be sexist)?
tell me more about how they faked the holocaust, you tiny-dicked jew hating white loser.I just like to make you look stupid.
they take statements from the candidates and fact check them using independently verifiable information.Confirmed by the Candidates ? That is what they would need to give credence.
We`ll go from that answer.
I never said faked, probably gave him a few extra numbers. But Stalin was worse and Mao was the worst though the Chinese could do with a little Holocaust couldn't they? For global warming of course.tell me more about how they faked the holocaust, you tiny-dicked jew hating white loser.
so you're saying the holocaust numbers were fake. got it.I never said faked, probably gave him a few extra numbers.
Everybody in the party likes Sanders. Politics is very competitive during election cyclesEveryone loves Bernie Sanders. Except, it seems, the Democratic party
One thing’s for sure: Democrats who refuse to change do so at their peril.
What do you think that means? "Everybody likes Sanders"? People like Schumer and Pelosi like him as a person? Sure, that's not outside the ordinary. But when it comes to the policies he supports, do you really think they like him then?Everybody in the party likes Sanders. Politics is very competitive during election cycles
How? What's the gameplan to defeat Trump? Are you banking on hoping Trump is so bad the American people won't have any other option but to vote in another Democrat? What do progressives actually gain from that?And anybody will beat Trump in 2020. If he doesn't quit or get forced out first.
You won't need a 'gamepIan', he'll beat himself if he's even still there.
How? What's the gameplan to defeat Trump?
SCOTUS nominations, better environment and global warming policies, a return to real news, public servants in cabinet positions as opposed to Exxon CEO's, humane immigration policies, how much time you got?What do progressives actually gain from that?
I took a look at some of the statements and they did not include 50 statements of the kind you indicate. Maybe I didn't see the same link you did? Maybe you are just making shit up? providing a link would be appreciated.Let`s talk about fake. I was banned for nothing last time I stopped here. Came back just2 show how stupid Mr.Buck thinks people are.
Take the chart you hold dear as facts. They are facts. Can not deny it. But, the chart is useless because it does not list the more than 50 statements taken from each Candidate since 2007 by PolitiFact.
Example of how it is facts but misleading information to use as props:
The more than 50 statements taken by PolitiFact since 2007 from Trump were about Trump stating things about his taxes.
The more than 50 statements taken by PolitiFact since 2007 from Clinton were about her clothes.
So PolitiFact makes Trump the biggest liar on the chart, and Clinton the most honest. (Grade school tactics)
Without the statements next to each Candidate, the chart states facts, but is very misleading. Apparently, you bought into to it. I do not for reasons stated.
So, facts they are, but worthless facts they are as well. No credence.
OK moderators,...you can ban me again for being smarter than Mr. Buck. I wont mind.
Right, so what does Stalin's awful crimes have to do with Hitler's? Mao was awful too. I drove over the speed limit once. On purpose too. Does that also make the holocaust OK? Tampit, that was one stupid post.I never said faked, probably gave him a few extra numbers. But Stalin was worse and Mao was the worst though the Chinese could do with a little Holocaust couldn't they? For global warming of course.
We just witnessed how well that strategy worked out. Democrats have been losing since 2010. If you bank on them doing it worse, you will not win votes. You have to offer something better, not just depend on the opposition failing.You won't need a 'gamepIan', he'll beat himself if he's even still there.
From the strategy of "TRUMP BAD!!!". Progressives will gain nothing because Democrats will lose again if that's all they can offerSCOTUS nominations, better environment and global warming policies, a return to real news, public servants in cabinet positions as opposed to Exxon CEO's, humane immigration policies, how much time you got?