Bernie Sanders is the most popular politician in the US

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
With the EC, obviously not.

I'm not fan of the EC as I stated before Nov. 8th.

The best possible (available) candidate who has similar beliefs to mine is who I vote for. I like Sanders, but I realize I'm not always going to get what I want.

As proven by the last 35 years.
Bernie's babies have bad memories.
 
Last edited:

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
As Perez Shakes Up Staff, Sanders Urges 'Total' Overhaul for Democratic Party
'It has got to become a grassroots party,' Sanders said

by
Andrea Germanos, staff writer

"Clearly the Democratic Party needs a top-down overhaul," Sen. Sanders (I-Vt.)

The Democratic National Committee's newly-installed chair, Tom Perez, has asked for the resignations of all the organization's staffers—a reorganization Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) says is "absolutely" needed.

The call for the resignations, with a deadline of April 15, comes "as the DNC attempts a makeover following the 2016 election cycle that left many in the party jaded not only about Democrats' electoral prospects, but the party's campaign competency" as Slate puts it.

The development was expected. CNNwrites:

"This is longstanding precedent at the DNC and has happened during multiple chair transitions," DNC spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa said. "The process was started before the election of the new chair. From the beginning, Tom has been adamant that we structure the DNC for future campaigns. Current and future DNC staff will be integral to that effort."

NBC News adds:

Immediately after Perez' election in late February, [an] adviser to outgoing DNC Interim Chair Donna Brazile, Leah Daughtry, asked every employee to submit a letter of resignation dated April 15, according to multiple sources familiar with the party's internal working.

A review committee is already underway looking at new potential staffers "to help decide not only who will stay and who will go, but how the party should be structured in the future," NBC News writes. And that transition committee's make-up, as the Washington Post's PowerPost blog wrote earlier this month, is being met with skepticism by some Sanders backers.

A full overhaul is exactly Sen. Bernie Saners, (I-Vt.) who had backed Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) in the DNC race, thinks is in order.

Speaking Wednesday to MSNBC's "Morning Joe," Sanders, who sits on the leadership of the Senate Democrats, charged that it is "absolutely" necessary.

"I mean the evidence is obvious" the party has failed, he said. "It's not just that we've lost the White House and the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House. We've lost 900 legislative seats in the last 8 or 9 years."

"So clearly the Democratic Party needs a top-down overhaul. And that top-down overhaul means that instead of becoming dependent and being dependent on big money interests for campaign contributions, it has got to become a grassroots party," he continued.

The comments echo those he made in the wake of the DNC vote when he said he hoped Perez wold seize the "real opportunity in his hands[...] which is to understand that in fact, the way the Democratic Party has been run for decades has not worked. We need a total transformation."

That appears to be something Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) sees as well.

NBC News notes that Perez held a meeting with his deputy chair as well as Sanders, Schumer, and several others to flush out the roles of the DNC's five vice chairs. The outlet wrote:

Schumer, pointing to Ellison and Sanders, told Perez, "If he's happy, and if he's happy, then I'm happy," according to two sources.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Don't people seek truth?

Facts are just facts.
From my reading and conversations here and elsewhere, I've come around to the realization that most people only seek out the truth in those areas of endeavor that interest them- and that very few are interested enough in politics to seek truth beyond the stuff they're spoon fed on their favorite mass media channels.

A recent study done by the New York Times on people's political opinions and their sources of information in the media recently found that only 4% of a starting sample of 1.5 million respondents had read at least 10 articles and 2 opinion pieces in the previous 60 days. I found this statistic both shocking- and telling.

As far as facts go, I'm pretty sure I recently posted an article here that discussed facts, fake facts and even more importantly, people's reactions to them.
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
From my reading and conversations here and elsewhere, I've come around to the realization that most people only seek out the truth in those areas of endeavor that interest them- and that very few are interested enough in politics to seek truth beyond the stuff they're spoon fed on their favorite mass media channels.

A recent study done by the New York Times on people's political opinions and their sources of information in the media indecently found that only 4% of a starting sample of 1.5 million respondents had read at least 10 articles and 2 opinion pieces in the previous 60 days. I found this statistic both shocking- and telling.

As far as facts go, I'm pretty sure I recently posted an article here that discussed facts, fake facts and even more importantly, people's reactions to them.
I came to this forum to learn about alternate views and have not been disappointed. I think a certain percentage of the population are driven to seek understanding and perhaps learn the truth. Maybe a small number. Maybe more seek comfort and not the truth. Others seek validation. IDK.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I came to this forum to learn about alternate views and have not been disappointed. I think a certain percentage of the population are driven to seek understanding and perhaps learn the truth. Maybe a small number. Maybe more seek comfort and not the truth. Others seek validation. IDK.
I'm applying to my local public radio station to go on the air with a radio show about politics. They said their basic mandate required any such show to be 'fair and balanced'- seriously, that's the exact phrase they used, lol- and I'm willing to work within that guideline.

After all, Mr Sanders has proven very popular with the conservative rank and file of late. It might be interesting to see where such a show might lead.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I'm applying to my local public radio station to go on the air with a radio show about politics. They said their basic mandate required any such show to be 'fair and balanced'- seriously, that's the exact phrase they used, lol- and I'm willing to work within that guideline.

After all, Mr Sanders has proven very popular with the conservative rank and file of late. It might be interesting to see where such a show might lead.
Good luck with that. I'd listen in.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I'm in too. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you
MATERIAL! Help with topics and relevant facts. Boring but necessary research.

I want to talk about issues and get everyone's opinion. Not only does that meet the fair n balanced requirement but it's likely to be something people haven't heard much of on the airwaves.

We've all heard the left and right wing rants, the slanted views, the spin. My working concept is different in that I want to talk about issues and get differing perspectives from real people. Let THEM do the ranting, and moderate by calling out the bullshit and asking questions- but not regulate just because someone thinks about a topic differently than I do.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
MATERIAL! Help with topics and relevant facts. Boring but necessary research.

I want to talk about issues and get everyone's opinion. Not only does that meet the fair n balanced requirement but it's likely to be something people haven't heard much of on the airwaves.

We've all heard the left and right wing rants, the slanted views, the spin. My working concept is different in that I want to talk about issues and get differing perspectives from real people. Let THEM do the ranting, and moderate by calling out the bullshit and asking questions- but not regulate just because someone thinks about a topic differently than I do.
You've only two people that agree with you in a mostly liberal leaning forum and you flame those that disagree...

Don't be offended if only 7 people tune in for the first episode and 2 for the second.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
You'd have made a fine anti aircraft gunner back in the day; it seems you don't know how to do anything but shoot people down.

In the modern era of politics, we rather need new solutions- but in spite of my repeatedly asking you about your ideas, you've resisted and deflected with desperate consistency.

It's easy to snipe at people, but it takes no imagination.

I'm disappointed in you.
 
Top