Brad Parscale: Trump's #1 Domestic Propaganda Troll

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
How do I know Susan Rosenberg a convicted terrorist raises funds for Black Lives Matters? It has been heavily reported on and even liberal Snopes verifies it.

"Susan Rosenberg has served as vice chair of the board of directors for Thousand Currents, an organization that provides fundraising and fiscal sponsorship for the Black Lives Matter Global Movement."

Thousand Currents is undoubtedly very closely linked to the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, a Delaware-registered entity that is one of the leading formal embodiments of the broader Black Lives Matter movement. The Thousand Currents website outlines the relationship between the two entities:

“In 2016, BLM Global Network approached Thousand Currents to create a fiscal sponsorship agreement. Thousand Currents, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit organization, provides the legal and administrative framework to enable BLM to fulfill its mission. Fiscal sponsorship is a common structure utilized by nonprofit organizations. Oftentimes, nonprofit initiatives seek fiscal sponsorship to be able to have the fiscal sponsor handle administrative operations while the organization focuses on its programs and builds up its own organizational infrastructure. In this capacity, we provide administrative and back office support, including finance, accounting, grants management, insurance, human resources, legal and compliance.”

Descriptions of Thousand Currents as an organization which “handles fundraising” for Black Lives Matter were therefore accurate.

As recently as June 24, the date on which the Capital Research Center published their report, the Thousand Currents website listed Susan Rosenberg as vice chair of the organization’s board of directors, describing her as a “human and prison rights advocate and writer.” The entire “board of directors” page has since been removed from the site.

According to tax documents obtained by Snopes, Rosenberg sat on the board of directors during the 2015 and 2016 financial years, and was elevated to the position of vice chair in 2017. We asked Thousand Currents for the dates of Rosenberg’s tenure on the board, and as its vice chair, and invited the organization to comment on the ongoing controversy, and will update this story if we receive a response.
Rosenberg’s prominent position within Thousand Currents is clear, as are that organization’s close links to the Black Lives Matter Global Network (and thereby the broader Black Lives Matter movement). However, the question of whether she should be described as a “terrorist” or “convicted terrorist” is much more complicated.

Arrests, Charges and Convictions
Originally from New York City, Rosenberg was an active member of several revolutionary left-wing groups and movements during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. In November 1984, she was arrested in Cherry Hill, New Jersey after police said she and an associate, Timothy Blunk, were found transferring 740 pounds of explosives, an Uzi submachine gun, an M-14 rifle, a rifle with a telescopic sight, a sawed-off shotgun, three 9-millimeter handguns and boxes of ammunition from a car into a storage locker.

Rosenberg was tried and convicted on the following charges: “Conspiracy to possess unregistered firearms, receive firearms and explosives shipped in interstate commerce while a fugitive, and unlawfully use false identification documents …; possession of unregistered destructive devices, possession of unregistered firearm (two counts) …; carrying explosives during commission of a felony … ; possession with intent to unlawfully use false identification documents…; false representation of Social Security number, possession of counterfeit Social Security cards.”

In May 1985, New Jersey U.S. District Court Judge Frederick Bernard Lacey gave Rosenberg and Blunk the maximum available sentence of 58 years each in prison. On Jan. 20, 2001, his last day in office, President Bill Clinton commuted Rosenberg’s sentence, and she was released from prison.
According to several contemporaneous news reports, Rosenberg had previously been charged with multiple offenses as part of a major 1982 conspiracy case against several prominent left-wing revolutionaries. Along with the others, Rosenberg was charged with conspiracy and racketeering offenses in connection with the following incidents:
  • The 1979 prison escape of Joanne Chesimard (also known as Assata Shakur), a former leader of the Black Liberation Army who had been serving a life sentence for the 1973 murder of a New Jersey State Trooper named Werner Foerster
  • The 1976 attempted robbery of an armored car in Pittsburgh
  • The 1980 robbery of an armored car in Manhattan
  • Three attempted robberies of armored cars in Danbury, Connecticut
  • Four attempted robberies of armored cars in Nanuet, New York, in 1980 and 1981

The most high-profile incident was the October 1981 Brink’s robbery in Nyack, New York. Several members of the Weather Underground and Black Liberation Army groups were accused of having orchestrated and carried out the violent robbery of a Brink’s armored vehicle at the Nanuet Mall, stealing total of $1.6 million. In the course of a police chase and shootout, two police officers and a Brink’s guard were killed. The money was recovered. Specifically, Rosenberg was accused of having driven one of the getaway cars.
After Rosenberg’s arrest in New Jersey in 1984, and her subsequent conviction and imprisonment on the weapons and explosives possession charges, prosecutors dropped the conspiracy and racketeering charges against her, and she was never tried or convicted in relation to the 1981 Brink’s robbery, the 1979 Shakur prison escape, or other armed robberies.
liberal snopes has been known to get it wrong tl/dr.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Justin is doing OK, he just cut a deal with another party, headed by an Indian Canadian, a fellow who wears a turban, he even looks like Justin! Justin avoided a fall election by adopting more left wing policies.

PS Who do you think dressed Justin up like that and expertly wound the turban? Yep Indo Canadians, black face doesn't have the same meaning for them, nobody even cares in Canada.
which is why it was hysterical but the Trump Train travels near and far..i'm glad we were cut off from all other counties; he can no longer continue to poison you.

he's our problem and we're going to handle him the american way.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
How do I know Susan Rosenberg a convicted terrorist raises funds for Black Lives Matters? It has been heavily reported on and even liberal Snopes verifies it.

"Susan Rosenberg has served as vice chair of the board of directors for Thousand Currents, an organization that provides fundraising and fiscal sponsorship for the Black Lives Matter Global Movement."

Thousand Currents is undoubtedly very closely linked to the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, a Delaware-registered entity that is one of the leading formal embodiments of the broader Black Lives Matter movement. The Thousand Currents website outlines the relationship between the two entities:

“In 2016, BLM Global Network approached Thousand Currents to create a fiscal sponsorship agreement. Thousand Currents, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit organization, provides the legal and administrative framework to enable BLM to fulfill its mission. Fiscal sponsorship is a common structure utilized by nonprofit organizations. Oftentimes, nonprofit initiatives seek fiscal sponsorship to be able to have the fiscal sponsor handle administrative operations while the organization focuses on its programs and builds up its own organizational infrastructure. In this capacity, we provide administrative and back office support, including finance, accounting, grants management, insurance, human resources, legal and compliance.”

Descriptions of Thousand Currents as an organization which “handles fundraising” for Black Lives Matter were therefore accurate.

As recently as June 24, the date on which the Capital Research Center published their report, the Thousand Currents website listed Susan Rosenberg as vice chair of the organization’s board of directors, describing her as a “human and prison rights advocate and writer.” The entire “board of directors” page has since been removed from the site.

According to tax documents obtained by Snopes, Rosenberg sat on the board of directors during the 2015 and 2016 financial years, and was elevated to the position of vice chair in 2017. We asked Thousand Currents for the dates of Rosenberg’s tenure on the board, and as its vice chair, and invited the organization to comment on the ongoing controversy, and will update this story if we receive a response.
Rosenberg’s prominent position within Thousand Currents is clear, as are that organization’s close links to the Black Lives Matter Global Network (and thereby the broader Black Lives Matter movement). However, the question of whether she should be described as a “terrorist” or “convicted terrorist” is much more complicated.

Arrests, Charges and Convictions
Originally from New York City, Rosenberg was an active member of several revolutionary left-wing groups and movements during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. In November 1984, she was arrested in Cherry Hill, New Jersey after police said she and an associate, Timothy Blunk, were found transferring 740 pounds of explosives, an Uzi submachine gun, an M-14 rifle, a rifle with a telescopic sight, a sawed-off shotgun, three 9-millimeter handguns and boxes of ammunition from a car into a storage locker.

Rosenberg was tried and convicted on the following charges: “Conspiracy to possess unregistered firearms, receive firearms and explosives shipped in interstate commerce while a fugitive, and unlawfully use false identification documents …; possession of unregistered destructive devices, possession of unregistered firearm (two counts) …; carrying explosives during commission of a felony … ; possession with intent to unlawfully use false identification documents…; false representation of Social Security number, possession of counterfeit Social Security cards.”

In May 1985, New Jersey U.S. District Court Judge Frederick Bernard Lacey gave Rosenberg and Blunk the maximum available sentence of 58 years each in prison. On Jan. 20, 2001, his last day in office, President Bill Clinton commuted Rosenberg’s sentence, and she was released from prison.
According to several contemporaneous news reports, Rosenberg had previously been charged with multiple offenses as part of a major 1982 conspiracy case against several prominent left-wing revolutionaries. Along with the others, Rosenberg was charged with conspiracy and racketeering offenses in connection with the following incidents:
  • The 1979 prison escape of Joanne Chesimard (also known as Assata Shakur), a former leader of the Black Liberation Army who had been serving a life sentence for the 1973 murder of a New Jersey State Trooper named Werner Foerster
  • The 1976 attempted robbery of an armored car in Pittsburgh
  • The 1980 robbery of an armored car in Manhattan
  • Three attempted robberies of armored cars in Danbury, Connecticut
  • Four attempted robberies of armored cars in Nanuet, New York, in 1980 and 1981

The most high-profile incident was the October 1981 Brink’s robbery in Nyack, New York. Several members of the Weather Underground and Black Liberation Army groups were accused of having orchestrated and carried out the violent robbery of a Brink’s armored vehicle at the Nanuet Mall, stealing total of $1.6 million. In the course of a police chase and shootout, two police officers and a Brink’s guard were killed. The money was recovered. Specifically, Rosenberg was accused of having driven one of the getaway cars.
After Rosenberg’s arrest in New Jersey in 1984, and her subsequent conviction and imprisonment on the weapons and explosives possession charges, prosecutors dropped the conspiracy and racketeering charges against her, and she was never tried or convicted in relation to the 1981 Brink’s robbery, the 1979 Shakur prison escape, or other armed robberies.
Pretty interesting.

I am not saying that woman is good news or anything like that, I have no knowledge of her crimes or position on issues now, nor why it matters that she is on a board. I am being very careful (because I don't know you) in how I am saying things because I don't want to make you think I am trolling you in any way. Because I am not. This is something new to me and I am highly suspicious of entities pushing the 'BLM' name prior to the social justice protests using this name early on in the Russian attack.


I haven't heard anything about "BLM Global Network Foundation" but it doesn't seem to have anything to do with the actual social justice protests going on here in America.

Moreover I find it suspicious that this organization was founded in 2013, which is a convergence of timelines of the initiation of the Russian attack on our democracy. Trump was in Moscow meeting with the Russian troll and Snowden landed in Moscow with the help of Assange being the big ones.


https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/black-lives-matter-foundation/
Screen Shot 2020-10-12 at 1.25.10 PM.png


I would ask why this fund matters to you?

I am just curious because we know that the Russians have been using the branding of BLM to attack our society, and they started their attack on our nation in 2013, the same time this foundation was created.

But that being said, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that these people are not a part of the scam to divide our nation. By using the BLM movement branding all over the internet while simultaneously collecting data on any person they were able to con into giving them their information, they would at the same time be advertising this particular phrase which also is very inflammatory. Same with 'Defund the Police', possibly the most misleading troll-able 'brandname' ever.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I was looking for the video about the data collection scam that the Russian military had done on the black community (the self defense scams were in the report), and came across this discussion about the Russian military using black Identity to discourage the vote in the Democratic party.

 

doug58

Well-Known Member
liberal snopes has been known to get it wrong tl/dr.
I had daily contact with Rosenberg for six months after she was taken into custody. She was an avowed Communist terrorist, suspected murderer, member of the Weather Underground and a spoiled rich girl.

 

mysunnyboy

Well-Known Member
Bull. As far as Parscale, he is under investigation for stealing $40 million from the Trump campaign and RNC. Where exactly are you getting your information? In 2016 the polls were proven to be wrong. In 2018, the democrats were expected to retake the Senate and instead lost four and picked up two for a net loss of two senate seats.

You really should disregard polls and fake media sites. But your comments verify you are obviously bias. In the 2016 election, the media and pollsters claimed Clinton had a 95% chance of winning the election right up until the day before the election. Clinton lost in an electoral landslide and the Republicans picked up 68 or 69 house seats and picked up Senate seats. A blowout. Polls can not be trusted.

In 2018, the democrats made a spectacle in the SCOTUS confirmation. That caused them to lose Senate seats. Last year, Impeachment. In the next two weeks, another SCOTUS confirmation takes place. If Democrats attack a female Catholic judge the way they did with Kavanaugh it will backfire.

In the 30 days before the presidential election in 2016, Trump managed to out work Clinton. He had rallies almost every day for months. Clinton campaigned only three days a week in the final two months. Two of those three days each week were private fundraisers.

Biden has only left his home in Wilmington Delaware 10 times in seven months to go to staged events with no voters present. Compared to Biden, Clinton was the energizer bunny.
There hasn't been a single debate yet.

You obviously didn't learn anything from 2016. No one can tell how the election will turn out with more than a month to go until election day. You can't predict an election from whatever box you have yourself in. Are you in the USA? I spent half my life as a rabid liberal Democrat. I left the Democrat party because of Bill Clinton when I was employed in the DOJ.
Get ready for an avalanche.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Bull. As far as Parscale, he is under investigation for stealing $40 million from the Trump campaign and RNC. Where exactly are you getting your information? In 2016 the polls were proven to be wrong. In 2018, the democrats were expected to retake the Senate and instead lost four and picked up two for a net loss of two senate seats.

You really should disregard polls and fake media sites. But your comments verify you are obviously bias. In the 2016 election, the media and pollsters claimed Clinton had a 95% chance of winning the election right up until the day before the election. Clinton lost in an electoral landslide and the Republicans picked up 68 or 69 house seats and picked up Senate seats. A blowout. Polls can not be trusted.

In 2018, the democrats made a spectacle in the SCOTUS confirmation. That caused them to lose Senate seats. Last year, Impeachment. In the next two weeks, another SCOTUS confirmation takes place. If Democrats attack a female Catholic judge the way they did with Kavanaugh it will backfire.

In the 30 days before the presidential election in 2016, Trump managed to out work Clinton. He had rallies almost every day for months. Clinton campaigned only three days a week in the final two months. Two of those three days each week were private fundraisers.

Biden has only left his home in Wilmington Delaware 10 times in seven months to go to staged events with no voters present. Compared to Biden, Clinton was the energizer bunny.
There hasn't been a single debate yet.

You obviously didn't learn anything from 2016. No one can tell how the election will turn out with more than a month to go until election day. You can't predict an election from whatever box you have yourself in. Are you in the USA? I spent half my life as a rabid liberal Democrat. I left the Democrat party because of Bill Clinton when I was employed in the DOJ.
amy coney barrett does not belong to a catholic institution since it's not supported by the Archdiocese..from what i've read it was started by a few catholics which is not the same thing as catholic institution.

just so we're square it's a cult and i have no issue with her belonging to it but then she can't have the job.
 
Top