Cannabis Strain Lineages for major retail strains

BLACKMESSIAH7

BLACKMESSIAH7

Well-Known Member
Thanks for the info bricktop! Good read and very informative. A real guide to work from and grow from (so to speak)

peace
 
Sierra1977

Sierra1977

Member
I noticed that there's no mention of most of the GREAT CALI strains Northern and Southern... LMK? I can name drop if you want?
 
seasmoke

seasmoke

Active Member
Bricktop, care to give a run down on ATF. I thought it was a clone only strain yet "IT" showed up here.
 
zeyroc420

zeyroc420

Active Member
in my opinion based on scientific data is that the older land races are nowhere near potent as the new strains and crosses.so the effort seems mute,but good luck
 
|B3RNY|

|B3RNY|

Well-Known Member
pinkus said:
agreed. I don't know what any of the stuff was called that my first grow mentor, a vietnam vet, used to get us...but it was stronger than ANYTHING i've ever had since. 4 or 5 hits and you had no clue as to how things worked...I remember a burning spear show that I took about that many...I got the munchies and tried the vending machine three times. I couldn't get the right thing despite probably a half hour of deliberating and concentrating.


I know that Indica has compleatly dominated the market and changed strains, but it CAN be bred out with patience and diligence. Current thought is that ALL cannabis originated from indica lines, so really, it already was.

Peace bro and good luck. I'm telling you this Mexi sure has a racy sativa buzz :) Made a MJ latte with it sunday and sat down by the river and tripped out...good shit :bigjoint:
Click to expand...
Lol, I thought most researchers/taxonomists agreed that all strains most likely originated from Cannabis Sativa? Hybrids are popular because most growers won't take the time to grow a real sativa. Indica will increase production & shorten flowering times, but there's plenty of sativa dominant hybrids that flower just as quickly. I'll take a sativa high over an indica stone any day.
 
S

SSHZ

Well-Known Member
zeyroc420 said:
in my opinion based on scientific data is that the older land races are nowhere near potent as the new strains and crosses.so the effort seems mute,but good luck
Click to expand...

You obviously don't have a clue what you are talking about........"scientific data"- LOL Some of the original, older strains were much stronger than most things available today. With a comment like that, you either weren't smoking in the 1970's and 80's OR you didn't have a good connection. Any old timer (like me) will tell you the strains back then were way better than most available today.
 
H

Hemlock

Well-Known Member
SSHZ said:
You obviously don't have a clue what you are talking about........"scientific data"- LOL Some of the original, older strains were much stronger than most things available today. With a comment like that, you either weren't smoking in the 1970's and 80's OR you didn't have a good connection. Any old timer (like me) will tell you the strains back then were way better than most available today.
Click to expand...
I to am an old timer and I don't agree with that at all.

todays strain have much more THC than the old days
 
S

SSHZ

Well-Known Member
Well then, you should know it's not ALL about THC levels......... it's about the makeup of the THC, which has something like 80 or more different components in it that help define the high. That's why some strains with 10% THC are much better (and/or stronger) then strains with 20%. It's not all about THC levels. Not knocking you, bud- and I guess it's all about different opinions- but I strongly disagree. Nothing more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top