My apologies but I cannot answer Your first question due to it's deep scientific basis.... I dont follow.
However I can explain chi . . . Chi, Prana, ENERGY . . . It is all relative.
I would research chakra energies if I were You to further explain the universal energy that resides within Us all....
One could say that DMT is chi.
I would love to research chakra energy but it is my way to seek the objective parts first. I have a scientific bias; to that I admit. I am very partial to a branch of human endeavor whose core maxim is "Don't take my word for it. Test the hypothesis with serious intent of falsifying it, and with objective means other workers in the field could reproduce. If the hypothesis survives, you get to keep going."
Contrast with the humanities and our lore of experience with spirit/spirits. many of those accounts are beautiful, which arouses in me a believer's bias. That attitude is the immediate death of rational inquiry. If it is purely subjective, I won't trust my findings. I am astonished at my mind's capacity to lie to itself. That is why i am focusing on nonaware sensors. It lessens the "observer effect" and "observer bias" cognition traps into which I so easily fall.
That said, I do not doubt that chakra energy exists. I believe physics will catch up, to the gain of both science and philosophy.
~edit~ I have taken DMT. It has aroused some fantastic ideation on my part but nothing that I can identify as "wisdom from outside myself". I find my experience to be purely subjective and thus beyond proper test.
