dear whites: kaepernick has more money and a hotter girlfriend than you ever will

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Michael Huntherz said:
Lol nope. It is racist because it makes claims about a specific racial group based on your personal bias. I think is funny as fuck when white peole get super-pissed about that, but it is not constructive to the cultural discourse. You can’t get my goat, Buck. My goat, pretty goat.
Click to expand...
White people get distressed when the subject of racism based upon skin color is discussed. This is true.
 
PetFlora

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
See how the second part says "ideas" to mislead from the fact that those ideas are to deprive women and minorities of rights?
Click to expand...
PCXV said:
Except literally every scientists wants to study the effects of marijuana and guns to get a better understanding but big industry makes laws that prevent it. Scientists are not the problem.
Click to expand...
Not all scientists are but those who were paid for their 'scientific studies' certainly are
 
PetFlora

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
paid for their science?

you mean, the quacks hired by exxonmobil to deny manmade global warming?

also, how do i stop bill gates from killing my kid with vaccines?

thanks.
Click to expand...
The person who started the weather channel says it's a hoax, but then he's not paid by the IMF, WHO, deep state, cabal...

what we finally agree on an issue- vaccines Holy Shit
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
PetFlora said:
The person who started the weather channel says it's a hoax, but then he's not paid by the IMF, WHO, deep state, cabal...

what we finally agree on an issue- vaccines Holy Shit
Click to expand...
so manmade global warming is a hoax by the "deep state" and vaccines are here to kill us and make us retarded?

tell me more.
 
SouthCross

SouthCross

Well-Known Member
whitebb2727 said:
Its right down stupid to think we are not destroying the earth and causing global warming.
Click to expand...
To the extent to what's repeatedly repeated. It's an excellent argument for population control. Who's going first? The gulf war dumped the century's pollution with burning oil. War for 16 years. The same stuff it took, in hundreds of gallons, to make, move, feed and to communicate in the your first world life. I say anybody with a private plane gets rounded up first. Balance out the carbon footprint of the rich and the wars they raise. You're the problem. Not them. Acid rain, ozone, draught, tornados, hurricanes, and now the temperature.

Two more degrees hotter!...


I'm out on this batch of koolaid.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
SouthCross said:
To the extent to what's repeatedly repeated. It's an excellent argument for population control. Who's going first? The gulf war dumped the century's pollution with burning oil. War for 16 years. The same stuff it took, in hundreds of gallons, to make, move, feed and to communicate in the your first world life. I say anybody with a private plane gets rounded up first. Balance out the carbon footprint of the rich and the wars they raise. You're the problem. Not them. Acid rain, ozone, draught, tornados, hurricanes, and now the temperature.

Two more degrees hotter!...


I'm out on this batch of koolaid.
Click to expand...
remember how they used to try to convince idiots that smoking wasn't dangerous?

same companies that used to do that are bnow trying to tell you global warming is a hoax.

only question is whether or not you are smart enough to learn from history in the most basic of manners now.
 
PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
PetFlora said:
Not all scientists are but those who were paid for their 'scientific studies' certainly are
Click to expand...
Which scientists are those? To me, it would be the shills working for the oil companies that are hardly accredited, if at all, and put opinion/false science over the scientific method and standards. I tend to trust the scientists that use multiple measure points, are open to peer review, and defend their theories according to the scientific method. Who funds the science really isn't the problem, it is how the science stands up to scrutiny.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Michael Huntherz said:
You know what, buddy? You are not an island. The reason you are alive is because people were able to cooperate, it is not bootlicking, its called civilization. Anti-intellectuallism such as you display is a serious problem. The idea that you are some kind of maverick who pulled hisself up by his own bootstraps is ludicrous, you probably would have died of Polio or Smallpox if not for science, government, and human beings cooperating to reach common understanding. Civilization, they call it.
Do you need to watch children die of preventable disease some more, or have sewage running through the streets before you understand how societies work, or can you merely shut off your massive ego and use your brain for two goddamn minutes? Science and government are not your enemies. We have all been conditioned to believe that shit, over the course of generations, by the giant corporate interests who are presently bleeding the value out of most world economies. The very concept of Corporate Personhood, and more specifically massive multinational corps in the fields of energy, transportation, commodities, and speculative finance (banks) are all much more likely to be things you should be angry with, or disrespectful of. Oddly enough, “business” should be your enemy, where “business” means “supply-side dominated economy”

I disrespect you, sir. Good day.
Click to expand...
Wow, that's got to be the most gentle application of catastrophic 3rd degree burns I've ever seen...
 
whitebb2727

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
SouthCross said:
To the extent to what's repeatedly repeated. It's an excellent argument for population control. Who's going first? The gulf war dumped the century's pollution with burning oil. War for 16 years. The same stuff it took, in hundreds of gallons, to make, move, feed and to communicate in the your first world life. I say anybody with a private plane gets rounded up first. Balance out the carbon footprint of the rich and the wars they raise. You're the problem. Not them. Acid rain, ozone, draught, tornados, hurricanes, and now the temperature.

Two more degrees hotter!...


I'm out on this batch of koolaid.
Click to expand...
What ever man. Its one thing to deny. Just own up to it. You don't care.
 
Michael Huntherz

Michael Huntherz

Well-Known Member
PetFlora said:
The person who started the weather channel says it's a hoax
Click to expand...
Starting a TV station about neurosurgery would not make me an expert on neurosurgery, it might mean I was an expert at starting a TV station, but without further information there would be no way to know. Follow me so far?

Here is a line by line refutation of John Coleman’s theory about climate change. It was written by a volunteer group of subject matter experts and professional scientists. Don’t reject the source before reading it. Use your mental faculties to honestly evaluate the information. Don’t reject it because you are skeptical about the messenger, please try evaluating the information itself.

http://www.uscentrist.org/platform/positions/environment/context-environment/john_coleman/the-amazing-story-behind-the-glob
 
Last edited:
Michael Huntherz

Michael Huntherz

Well-Known Member
dagwood45431 said:
Exactly NOT a coincidence, fucking nutter.
Click to expand...
You know what? Sigh, this is likely to upset almost everyone...it is possible that gun manufacturers and liberals collude to cause or otherwise facilitate mass shootings so that firearms industry interests make a lot of money, and more democrat politicians get elected. I do not believe this is the truth, I am simply stating if one looks at who benefits after a mass shooting in the US, those are probably the two groups who win biggest. It is worth consideration, if not investigation. There seems to be a bit of a cycle, yet very little ever changes with the gun laws, or even the conversation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top