haight
Well-Known Member
i reject the question for its presupposition.
Debate #3
- Thread starter tryingtogrow89
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
except you made a false presupposition, and my presupposition is verifiably true.
sand in the vag?
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
And UB is right back to attacking posters rather than having a discussion... So typical...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i believe i did both. i pointed out the difference between a question with a false/true presupposition, and then engaged him since he tends to make one line sentence replies that are lies and run away.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Foolish puppet we own the sky's.....again in what branch of the service did you serve????
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i believe he was a sailor's sock.
FreedomWorks
Well-Known Member
So now you want to talk to me all the sudden? Don't you normally ignore every question I've ever asked you Mr lilly ledbetter. Are we on speaking terms now?
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
If i had to guess which one won tonight it would have to be mittrack obamney.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Not at all puppet ... I just enjoy showing that you don't know shit.
Gibb
Member
Obama won the debate, and while he's not the messiah, he's still better than Romney for the general populace. Anyone who complains that both candidates are the same and doesn't vote shouldn't be allowed to bitch when they disagree with the president's choices. You have your chance, and if you use it, then kudos. If not, you'll be shining my shoes.
What would happen if we put a bunch of stoners like us in charge of foreign policy>>>>>
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
[youtube]W6cZdSJvOME[/youtube]What would happen if we put a bunch of stoners like us in charge of foreign policy>>>>>
@ :20
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
You guys have killed more children in Pakistan (an ally) than Al Queda killed in Sept 11th (and they fucking hate you guys).
Children killed by US (supposed "good guys") in an ALLIED COUNTRY by drones: 176
Children killed by Al Queda (self professed terrorists) in a declared enemy's country: 8
So...what gives?
Children killed by US (supposed "good guys") in an ALLIED COUNTRY by drones: 176
Children killed by Al Queda (self professed terrorists) in a declared enemy's country: 8
So...what gives?
fb360
Active Member
I think this debate was fairly even, with Obama possibly taking a slight victory; neither candidate stood out imo.
In my opinion, these last 2 debates haven't been too spectacular for Romney, and the more I hear him talk, the worse I think he does. Obama just doesn't have what it takes to get shit done.
My vote won't go to Obama due to his performance during his first term, and my vote won't go to Romney because I think he just isn't what we need. Financially yes, socially no.
In my opinion, these last 2 debates haven't been too spectacular for Romney, and the more I hear him talk, the worse I think he does. Obama just doesn't have what it takes to get shit done.
My vote won't go to Obama due to his performance during his first term, and my vote won't go to Romney because I think he just isn't what we need. Financially yes, socially no.
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
Well pat your self on the fucking back!
Seriously good for you thinking for your self.
All these other douches love the left/right one party paradigm, they cant do anything outside it.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that was harsh, that crosses the trolling line i'd say.
i mean, i don't like the guy, but i thought that was a very impartial, well stated opinion.
also, can you point out where he says n-bombs explode on impact? that shit sounds hilarious.
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
I cant believe im going to say this but i agree, things were staying civil then all of a sudden HELLO!
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
I chalk up that tension to a past between them im not on par with.
Smoke that weed fellas
Tonight was some depressing shit.
Smoke that weed fellas
Tonight was some depressing shit.
fb360
Active Member
I used it as a basic example to explain my point that the test rocket fired by North Korea didn't have a nuke in it, and wasn't their best attempt at getting a nuke to the USA...
My example was that if they were to have a nuclear warhead that failed as it did, it would have detonated over them... I clearly state in that thread that it takes a catalytic reaction to trigger the detonation.
Furthermore, Harrekin couldn't even explain the basic concept of why the bomb is detonated above the target... I mean, if you can't even comprehend the premise of a blast radius, you have no business discussing the operation of a nuke lol
e;
Lastly, he is stuck on my example, even though the mechanism to trigger the catalytic reaction is semantics, and wasn't even the topic of debate...
And to be clear, my example is valid, because the first atomic bomb ever detonated was detonated at ground level as a test.