Backed into a corner bahahaha
Exactly, nothing else to say.
Backed into a corner bahahaha
Sure, make it an attack when you're backed into a corner.
You can easily look up the lead scientist who ran this trial. She has a Bachelors in Chemistry and a Ph.D in Horticulture. She has been training in her discipline for over 10 years.
Internet is hard for you I get it....
How about you grow up and try to intellectually defend your stance instead of being so dismissive and running from confrontation while at the same time being inflammatory and adding stupid laughing emojis to all posts I make.
Ridiculous how some people conduct themselves. Are you 15?
How about you grow up and try to intellectually defend your stance instead of being so dismissive and running from confrontation while at the same time being inflammatory and adding stupid laughing emojis to all posts I make.
Ridiculous how some people conduct themselves. Are you 15?
So why does she suggest flushing on her feed schedule then?
We have another @CanadianGrower420 on our hands here.
Perhaps she doesn't control the company from every aspect and is merely a scientist on their R&D team? (ya know, as I said earlier...)
Is a little face on the internets making you upset?
Ahhh now assumptions
neat
How about you actually grow instead of reading maybe
you might have been a member for 10 years but I can tell you don’t even grow by the shit you’re spewing
How about you actually grow instead of reading maybe
you might have been a member for 10 years but I can tell you don’t even grow by the shit you’re spewing
You make an obviously wrong assumption and then attempt to call me out for assuming that the scientist who ran this trial doesn't have the final say in the companies feeding schedule?
Your logic is so flawed its actually funny.
God you’re awful.
I'm not demanding anything. All I'm stating is that when you act like you know something that you really don't, you look like an ass. You further this looking like an ass by continuing to be defensive when confronted.
I merely cited scientific proof. Where is your proof that flushing is good "bEcAuse A pLanT EAts iTseLf"?!?
Im trying to get a simple answer from you. Me being defensive? Haha.
So I ask again. Do you agree that plants eat themselves? That’s what I said. You’re not giving me a straight answer.
Also if u read what I said I didn’t say flushing was good. I said tapered feeds and water at the end. Flushing imo is flooding the roots with water trying to get minerals out the buds which is pointless. Those minerals are stored during its flowering cycle - so to avoid shit weed don’t over feed.
Im trying to get a simple answer from you. Me being defensive? Haha.
So I ask again. Do you agree that plants eat themselves? That’s what I said. You’re not giving me a straight answer.
Also if u read what I said I didn’t say flushing was good. I said tapered feeds and water at the end. Flushing imo is flooding the roots with water trying to get minerals out the buds which is pointless. Those minerals are stored during its flowering cycle - so to avoid shit weed don’t over feed.
I agree a plant can "eat" itself. But I think it goes further than that.
You have to ask yourself what this has to do with smooth smoke?
If the plant eats its leave to keep the buds alive. The leaves die and the buds would have the same amount of elements in it in order to be healthy? Because in this theory, logically the buds are staying alive by eating the leaves. So what does the lack of nitrogen in a dead leaf have to do with a bud that still have the nitrogen.
Sorry if I did come across as a douche to you earlier, reading back I didn't even notice.