Did i flush to early on my auto?

P10p said:
Sure, make it an attack when you're backed into a corner.

You can easily look up the lead scientist who ran this trial. She has a Bachelors in Chemistry and a Ph.D in Horticulture. She has been training in her discipline for over 10 years.

Internet is hard for you I get it....
Click to expand...

So why does she suggest flushing on her feed schedule then?

We have another @CanadianGrower420 on our hands here.
 
How about you grow up and try to intellectually defend your stance instead of being so dismissive and running from confrontation while at the same time being inflammatory and adding stupid laughing emojis to all posts I make.

Ridiculous how some people conduct themselves. Are you 15?
 
P10p said:
How about you grow up and try to intellectually defend your stance instead of being so dismissive and running from confrontation while at the same time being inflammatory and adding stupid laughing emojis to all posts I make.

Ridiculous how some people conduct themselves. Are you 15?
Click to expand...

How about you actually grow instead of reading maybe

you might have been a member for 10 years but I can tell you don’t even grow by the shit you’re spewing
 
P10p said:
How about you grow up and try to intellectually defend your stance instead of being so dismissive and running from confrontation while at the same time being inflammatory and adding stupid laughing emojis to all posts I make.

Ridiculous how some people conduct themselves. Are you 15?
Click to expand...

Is a little face on the internets making you upset?
 
bk78 said:
Is a little face on the internets making you upset?
Click to expand...

Not really, I'm just letting you know you come across as overly angry and aggressive for no reason, and it really does diminish your argument. Can't take someone serious when they clearly have so little self control.
 
bk78 said:
How about you actually grow instead of reading maybe

you might have been a member for 10 years but I can tell you don’t even grow by the shit you’re spewing
Click to expand...

You make an obviously wrong assumption and then attempt to call me out for assuming that the scientist who ran this trial doesn't have the final say in the companies feeding schedule?

Your logic is so flawed its actually funny.
 
bk78 said:
How about you actually grow instead of reading maybe

you might have been a member for 10 years but I can tell you don’t even grow by the shit you’re spewing
Click to expand...

And if we are digging into each others profile, I notice your account was created around christmas..

So nice of your mommy to buy you a nice blurple for being a good boy.
 
P10p said:
You make an obviously wrong assumption and then attempt to call me out for assuming that the scientist who ran this trial doesn't have the final say in the companies feeding schedule?

Your logic is so flawed its actually funny.
Click to expand...

God you’re awful.
 
Crazy how you reference a scientific trial and the bro scientists come out of the rift raft all offended...

People realize cancer medicine companies do R&D on cancer. Coca cola does R&D on carbonated drinks. Samsung does R&D on mobile phones. Nutrient companies do R&D on cannabis.

How is this so controversial....
 
We were having good discussion for our first two posts of interaction. Unfortunately, he resorts to personal attacks instead of considering that scientists might be good at science...
 
P10p said:
I'm not demanding anything. All I'm stating is that when you act like you know something that you really don't, you look like an ass. You further this looking like an ass by continuing to be defensive when confronted.

I merely cited scientific proof. Where is your proof that flushing is good "bEcAuse A pLanT EAts iTseLf"?!?
Click to expand...

Im trying to get a simple answer from you. Me being defensive? Haha.

So I ask again. Do you agree that plants eat themselves? That’s what I said. You’re not giving me a straight answer.

Also if u read what I said I didn’t say flushing was good. I said tapered feeds and water at the end. Flushing imo is flooding the roots with water trying to get minerals out the buds which is pointless. Those minerals are stored during its flowering cycle - so to avoid shit weed don’t over feed.
 
Nutty sKunK said:
Im trying to get a simple answer from you. Me being defensive? Haha.

So I ask again. Do you agree that plants eat themselves? That’s what I said. You’re not giving me a straight answer.

Also if u read what I said I didn’t say flushing was good. I said tapered feeds and water at the end. Flushing imo is flooding the roots with water trying to get minerals out the buds which is pointless. Those minerals are stored during its flowering cycle - so to avoid shit weed don’t over feed.
Click to expand...

I agree a plant can "eat" itself. But I think it goes further than that.

You have to ask yourself what this has to do with smooth smoke?

If the plant eats its leave to keep the buds alive. The leaves die and the buds would have the same amount of elements in it in order to be healthy? Because in this theory, logically the buds are staying alive by eating the leaves. So what does the lack of nitrogen in a dead leaf have to do with a bud that still have the nitrogen.

Sorry if I did come across as a douche to you earlier, reading back I didn't even notice.
 
Nutty sKunK said:
Im trying to get a simple answer from you. Me being defensive? Haha.

So I ask again. Do you agree that plants eat themselves? That’s what I said. You’re not giving me a straight answer.

Also if u read what I said I didn’t say flushing was good. I said tapered feeds and water at the end. Flushing imo is flooding the roots with water trying to get minerals out the buds which is pointless. Those minerals are stored during its flowering cycle - so to avoid shit weed don’t over feed.
Click to expand...

And just so i'm clear as well i'm not trying to make a case for either flushing or not flushing. I'm simply looking for answers. And again, the only real test I can find, is the one by RX green technologies. Which shows no difference in flush vs no flush.
 
P10p said:
I agree a plant can "eat" itself. But I think it goes further than that.

You have to ask yourself what this has to do with smooth smoke?

If the plant eats its leave to keep the buds alive. The leaves die and the buds would have the same amount of elements in it in order to be healthy? Because in this theory, logically the buds are staying alive by eating the leaves. So what does the lack of nitrogen in a dead leaf have to do with a bud that still have the nitrogen.

Sorry if I did come across as a douche to you earlier, reading back I didn't even notice.
Click to expand...

That’s why left it open ended for I don’t know if it makes it smoother.

Logically there is no difference in where the nitrogen comes from to feed the buds. But I don’t know what processes go on during that metabolism. Perhaps its easier to convert it than drawing it from the roots. I don’t know. Plants are complex things. As I’m sure you’re aware of. You don’t know until you know, you know?

No bother - I see what you’re getting at as there is a common myth surrounding flushed buds.

Makes a little sense if you over feed then flush for a long time so the plant packs on weight without too much food. But feelingly correctly and flushing would show less of an improvement. Could this be where they went wrong and people swear by ‘flushing improved the smoke’? When they simply just over fed?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top