Did the government realize the tax implications of Obamacare?

nitro harley

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
LOL. Doh! I will let you soak in what you just did there. Don't worry, take your time.

You are absolutely right, he did work 50 weeks. And was paid for it. So what are we arguing about?
Click to expand...
So for the year Joe worked for 50 weeks and got two weeks paid vacation...There I fixed it..
 
nitro harley

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
althor said:
In 30 years of being a part of the workforce, I have never had a paid vacation.
Click to expand...
I don't get paid vacations either..Or my workers, my job has seasons and we work for eight months out of the year. So we have four months out of the year to take vacations..
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
nitro harley said:
You brought up Costco and now that isn't good enough? And now you want to include all companies..It would be best if you just concede and move on because you keep moving the goal post...
Click to expand...
Ok. Let's use Costco. Even Costco shows that it only provides 1 WEEK to its ELIGIBLE employees. Still not proving that all hourly employees receive paid vacations. Try again.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
I worked at a place where you got a week off after a year of employment. Providing you had that year of service by January 1st. So if you got hired on January 2nd you had to wait 2 years for that week of vacation
Click to expand...
WHAT?? According to plastic explosive man, Wage earners NEVER get paid vacation!!
Now you are just proving him wrong even more.
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
see4 said:
You're a fucking moron. You know you can't prove that every company gives paid vacations to ALL its employees. You have shown me one instance where a "generous" company is giving its employees a WEEK of paid vacation after the first year, they have to wait another 4 years to get two weeks.

Prove to me that all companies pay all their employees paid vacation. Show me a state mandate that regulates that.

You have proved nothing. Please go back to the drawing board, and try again.
Click to expand...
http://www.fairwork.gov.au/employment/national-employment-standards/pages/what-are-the-10-nes-entitlements.aspx
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
LOL obviously even MORE butt hurt. EPIC!!! LOL

Eligible employees are full time employess, of course any simpleton would know that if they chanced a look at the evidence, but some people aren't even smart enough to even be granted the consideration of being called a simpleton. For some people, simpleton is a higher calling, a goal to strive towards. Someone like you see4.

PLEASE PLEASE show us how butt hurt you are by coming up with even more outrageous claims. Oh and please keep changing your argument too, its the only way you can keep your poor little fragile ego intact there little boy.

EPIC!!

You ARE the laughing stock of this board. I can only imagine that other liberals would want to keep their distance from you for fear of stupidity infection.
I mean you did notice that NONE of the other liberals is agreeing with you right? Wait, of course you didn't, that would require a simpleton's mind, of which you have not yet attained.
Click to expand...
althor said:
In 30 years of being a part of the workforce, I have never had a paid vacation.
Click to expand...
WOOOOOOPS!!!!

Dude, you are beyond childish. You are wrong, plain and simple. You can't prove to me that all companies are required to both give all hourly employees vacations AND pay them during that vacation time. And because you can't prove this, I am correct in my assumption that a full time hourly employee can both not receive vacation time as well as potentially not get paid for any vacation time they may receive.

All I ask for is a simple copy and paste. But you can't fucking find it, because it doesn't exist. You keep saying I change my story, but I have not done so. I have stated from the very beginning that not every hourly employee gets paid vacations. This is cited by several examples of folks in here stating my very premise. Yet you ignore it. You are so childish its literally laughable.

Though I admit, my butt hurts a little, I had tacos last night for dinner, and I'm paying for it now. I swear I make green clouds whenever I take a dump. It is fucking nasty.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
i'm assuming you're acknowledging you're wrong and have decided to post a picture of your excited state after writing a line of code?

Congrats bro, only thing missing is your sopmod clone...
Click to expand...
You posted a link to an Australian site, which has absolutely no bearing whatsoever to our conversation. You did it in hopes that somehow you could prove me wrong, but you only showed us how silly you are. Try to keep up buddy.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
So what's your problem with Obamacare again?
Click to expand...
What if Joe is healthy as a horse, plans to live forever, and would rather spend that $4,000 per year on whiskey and whores, you know pretty much like every young person in America? Do you think Joe is going to like chipping in $4K to cover your wife's birth control pills?
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
see4 said:
You posted a link to an Australian site, which has absolutely no bearing whatsoever to our conversation. You did it in hopes that somehow you could prove me wrong, but you only showed us how silly you are. Try to keep up buddy.
Click to expand...
actually I knew it would get a rise out of you. It's also telling of how your government views its citizens.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
actually I knew it would get a rise out of you. It's also telling of how your government views its citizens.
Click to expand...
While I agree our government is very silly, you were mistaken that your link would get a rise out of me. I just shrugged it off, as I do with NoDrama. We now know he is full of shit.

But anyway, but to the matter at hand. Though I disagree with some things the government does, I agree with many others. In this particular case, I wish the government were more involved in minimum and benefits. But alas, Republicans are once again on the scene to ruin shit for people who most need it.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
That isn't what you claimed, you are changing your tune now because you know for sure that you are indeed a complete moron.
You claimed that hourly wage earners do not get paid vacation. That is your claim, you don't get to add things to that claim as we go along.

lol you can claim the opposite all you want, but even the lowliest imbecile can read the thread and see what you claimed, So you just go bask in your shit and hide under your rock where you really belong, you gutless simpering fool.

NO ONE AGREES WITH YOU, NO ONE!! See how many people will support your claim that wage earners don't get paid vacation. I think you will find that you are the only idiot on that side of the moron boat.
Click to expand...
You are really really butthurt. And it shows. Yes, I am claiming that hourly wage earners do not get paid vacations. And I am correct in saying that. There are more hourly employees who do NOT get paid vacations than do. If you can prove to me otherwise, I will admit I am wrong. But you can't.

rollitup said:
Let's see, that's not entirely accurate. Your Rep Power is 110, so you inflated it by 500 points.


Aren't you the one who is routinely calling other members liars? :lol:

Maybe you're "too stupid" to understand numbers? Now go fucking cry!


:mrgreen:
Click to expand...


WOOOOOOOPS!!!!!!!!!
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
What if Joe is healthy as a horse, plans to live forever, and would rather spend that $4,000 per year on whiskey and whores, you know pretty much like every young person in America? Do you think Joe is going to like chipping in $4K to cover your wife's birth control pills?
Click to expand...
joe makes $12k a year. he has free health insurance through medicaid, shit for brains.

joe's uncle, robert, who is an auto mechanic making about $50k a year (400% of poverty) would face about $4k a year for insurance. but not joe.

do you even bother to try to land somewhere near reality with your wild flails and fails?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top