Gadaffiduck
Active Member
I guess you have no problem with child labour thenthat could be a one meal a day for a family of 4 back there
I guess you have no problem with child labour thenthat could be a one meal a day for a family of 4 back there
Target is owned by the French douchebagsI had a short time job as a cat burglar in my youth.Never stolen from department stores,but if I would it would be Mao Mart.Chinese Owned.Target is another good one Owned by Iran I think.They refuse to let people raise money for Veterans and Boy/Girl Scouts out in front of there establishments.
MOST everyone is owned by douchebags, imho.Target is owned by the French douchebags
I could make 22 grand today if I wanted. LMAO Must have been nice while in highschool though. I made 15k sophmore year. =)I used to be a "pro" thief
From the age of 16-18 I stole 22,000. yes twenty two thousand, dollars from dept stores. On my 18 B-day I jacked beef jerky from WAWA and got caught by a freckle faced teen in the cooler.
Just a warning but it cured the bugf
thats not pro. a person with a full time job making min wage can make more then that in 2 years. should have just worked.I used to be a "pro" thief
From the age of 16-18 I stole 22,000. yes twenty two thousand, dollars from dept stores. On my 18 B-day I jacked beef jerky from WAWA and got caught by a freckle faced teen in the cooler.
Just a warning but it cured the bugf
I couldn't disagree with a statement more. Let me ask you. You believe me raping and murdering the 6 year old little boy next door is only wrong because of some sort of cultural or social construct? Please articulate an argument for the relativity of Murder. The same philosophic idealism pertains to theft.Ethics and Morals are subjective and pathetic.
i will accept that challenge, but must wait until tomorrow to post. Momma's home.I couldn't disagree with a statement more. Let me ask you. You believe me raping and murdering the 6 year old little boy is only wrong because of some sort of cultural or social construct? Please articulate an argument for the relativity of Murder. The same philosophic idealism pertains to theft.
That wasn't your challenge but have at it.i will accept that challenge, but must wait until tomorrow to post. Momma's home.
No. I didn't say that. I said, well, LMAO, what you quoted. It can be as wrong for as many reasons as you want. But its only wrong for those reasons because you make it so. It will NOT be wrong to other people just because you want it to. Therefor, it's subjective. Therefor, it's a pathetic excuse.I couldn't disagree with a statement more. Let me ask you. You believe me raping and murdering the 6 year old little boy next door is only wrong because of some sort of cultural or social construct? Please articulate an argument for the relativity of Murder. The same philosophic idealism pertains to theft.
Huh? You know yOu didn't actually say anything in this statement. You said Morality is Subjective and Pathetic I find that a seriously flawed statement. Morality to be subjective would require the act of the crime to be a fabrication itself. Crime happens and whether or not you consider it a crime doesn't change the facts.No. I didn't say that. I said, well, LMAO, what you quoted. It can be as wrong for as many reasons as you want. But its only wrong for those reasons because you make it so. It will NOT be wrong to other people just because you want it to. Therefor, it's subjective. Therefor, it's a pathetic excuse.
My position on you a rapist and murderer that violated and executed a 6 year old little boy is, I couldn't care any less.
But would you care if it was your 6 year old little boy?No. I didn't say that. I said, well, LMAO, what you quoted. It can be as wrong for as many reasons as you want. But its only wrong for those reasons because you make it so. It will NOT be wrong to other people just because you want it to. Therefor, it's subjective. Therefor, it's a pathetic excuse.
My position on you a rapist and murderer that violated and executed a 6 year old little boy is, I couldn't care any less.
We seldom agree.theives are peices of shit. if you are stealing anything at all from anybody, you are a peice of shit. grow up and pay for stuff.
You are right. Violation of individual and property right is wrong. It's not wrong because a corporation passes on the losses to the consumer and we have to pay for the theft. It's wrong because its a violation of rights.We seldom agree.
Happily, this time we do.
Theft is a crime. Just because the victim is a faceless corporation, the folks still feel it.
The corporation simply passes the loss onto the consumers in the form of higher prices.
But that's irrelevant to my point.
From time to time I see threads denouncing weed thieves, and rightly so.
There is no difference here.
Theft is a 'mala in se' offense. Meaning it is morally wrong.
It is not 'mala prohibita' like cannabis use. Illegal just because people in authority declare it so.
Theft hurts everybody. Don't do it.
Is this where you trick me into revealing my bluff? No, I wouldn't care.But would you care if it was your 6 year old little boy?