Marijuana laws are based on corruption, look that up, Hearst, DuPont and their ilk. Immigration laws in place to attempt to prevent 200 million people supporting 7 billion other people.
I agree, marijuana is based on "corruption". We aren't debating that.
However I disagree with your second point. But only partially. I agree that we need to control our borders so that others can not take advantage. But I disagree that a 50 foot wall is going to solve our problems. We need to look at education and corporate reform rather than walls and border patrol.
The point being, which you made for me earlier, is that nitro thinks that one law is bad (the marijuana law), so he breaks it. But he thinks the other law is good, so he supports it. And is fighting for it tooth-and-nail.
Whereas I don't particularly agree with either fully. And so I can't pass judgement on either.
If nitro feels strongly about NOT breaking laws, then he should stop smoking, growing or selling marijuana.
Is this such a hard concept to grasp?