Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.

bu$hleaguer

Well-Known Member
"this judge has every reason not to be open-minded" - you



because he is a member of a latino organization. that was your reason.

are you too stupid to understand that is the very definition of racism?
Jesus Christ, youre thick headed. You post quotes of mine that don't support your little captions underneath and then try to make it look how you want it to.

You don't think that a judge (regardless of race) who has ties to an organization that obviously disagrees with trump's platform could lean against him for that very reason? Seems fair to me to question it, what's the problem?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You don't think that a judge (regardless of race) who has ties to an organization that obviously disagrees with trump's platform could lean against him for that very reason? Seems fair to me to question it, what's the problem?
NCLRLA stands for equality empowerment and justice.

so you are saying trump's platform is inherently racist, number one. number two, you are saying that there is no possible way any hispanic can be objective in a fraud case if the defendant is a racist white guy.

how exactly would his membership in a latino organization prevent him from fairly hearing and trying the facts about a fraud case? spell it out, racist.
 

bu$hleaguer

Well-Known Member
NCLRLA stands for equality empowerment and justice.

so you are saying trump's platform is inherently racist, number one. number two, you are saying that there is no possible way any hispanic can be objective in a fraud case if the defendant is a racist white guy.

how exactly would his membership in a latino organization prevent him from fairly hearing and trying the facts about a fraud case? spell it out, racist.
Interesting how you got all that from what I've said.

But yeah, I can agree with a lot in your first two points, sure. Not just a racist white guy though, a guy who is running for prez on the very platform which is against the judge's principles.

I'm saying that I can see how it could be questionable that the judge set to hear a case against a presidential candidate who openly spews hateful comments about the judge's nationality is possibly motivated against trump. My take is that a person has a right to a fair trial, and the fact that trump raised questions about his judge in his upcoming trial is justified and he's allowed to do that. Nothing more nothing less.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Interesting how you got all that from what I've said.

But yeah, I can agree with a lot in your first two points, sure. Not just a racist white guy though, a guy who is running for prez on the very platform which is against the judge's principles.

I'm saying that I can see how it could be questionable that the judge set to hear a case against a presidential candidate who openly spews hateful comments about the judge's nationality is possibly motivated against trump. My take is that a person has a right to a fair trial, and the fact that trump raised questions about his judge in his upcoming trial is justified and he's allowed to do that. Nothing more nothing less.
of course trump is allowed to be racist, as are you. you are both doing a fine job of that.

but the judge isn't allowed to be. he can only cite law, not racist rhetoric like you.

funny how adamantly you defend racism.
 

bu$hleaguer

Well-Known Member
of course trump is allowed to be racist, as are you. you are both doing a fine job of that.

but the judge isn't allowed to be. he can only cite law, not racist rhetoric like you.

funny how adamantly you defend racism.
You're fucked in the head, buck. That's all I can say. Adamantly defending racism? Uh, ok, sure thing. Go back to trying to slither your way out of your defense of Isis in the other thread, that ones way more exciting than watching you try to make something out of nothing over here.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You're fucked in the head, buck. That's all I can say. Adamantly defending racism? Uh, ok, sure thing. Go back to trying to slither your way out of your defense of Isis in the other thread, that ones way more exciting than watching you try to make something out of nothing over here.
i wouldn't exactly call your indefensible racism "nothing".
 

bu$hleaguer

Well-Known Member
i don't think it's that you are bored, i think you are quite riled. it's just that the racism you are espousing is indefensible.
No, I'm actually bored. I've been surfing the web for Patagonia sales and last nights bonoroo setlists, just checking back now and then so I can be entertained by your lame drivel.
 

mr sunshine

Well-Known Member
Why can't white people see how racist they are? Oblivious to their their own racism, Always trying to find a loophole. Finding a loophole doesn't make you pasty muthufuckers smart, it just makes you guys look (more) fucking racist . Trump didn't discriminate on the judge because of an organization he was a part of. He specifically said Mexican heritage, then he said he'd feel the same way if the judge was Muslim. Thats fucking racist,why would anyone want to defend a retarded looking, self centered, racist old white man? I find that guy extremely annoying, seems like he only knows 8 or 9 words. I just dont get it..


If half the people on a marijuana grow site are smarter then you, you shouldn't be the president of the United States of America.




If you want to fuck your own kid's, you shouldn't be president of the United States of America.







If the only people at your rallys are white angry people with tiny flaccid penises, you shouldn't be the president of the United States of America.





The majority of women aren't voting for trump,they all find him disgusting and disrespectful.mexicans aren't voting for his ass,African Americans aren't voting for trump. Most white people aren't either, the People that you see at his rallys are the only people voting for him. He wont come close to winning.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
that is the most pathetically desperate pile of nonsense i have ever seen.

so incredibly desperate.



you said he was a pedo though. now you are just saying he had consensual sex with an adult woman.

how fucking stupid are you?

I used your deduction of affiliation means guilty of. You need to put up or shut up because nowhere did I say consensual,...you did. Now put up where I did.

You cannot deny that Bill lied to America as President and You cannot say he did not visit Pedo Island.

You aint melting now, you`re freezing. Stuck on stupid and denial.

The judge can be open minded and fair but cannot become non affiliated.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I used your deduction of affiliation means guilty of. You need to put up or shut up because nowhere did I say consensual,...you did. Now put up where I did.

You cannot deny that Bill lied to America as President and You cannot say he did not visit Pedo Island.

You aint melting now, you`re freezing. Stuck on stupid and denial.

The judge can be open minded and fair but cannot become non affiliated.
it was actually monica lewinsky who said it was consensual sex. which is a lot different than pedophilia.

but no one is stopping you and the rest of the trump racists from being ridiculously and pathetically desperate.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
it was actually monica lewinsky who said it was consensual sex. which is a lot different than pedophilia.

but no one is stopping you and the rest of the trump racists from being ridiculously and pathetically desperate.

Can you have consensual sex with a man you know is married without asking his wife ?
Bill`s visits to Pedo Island means he is a Pedo, Correct ? Unless you can say what he was doing there.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
it was actually monica lewinsky who said it was consensual sex. which is a lot different than pedophilia.

but no one is stopping you and the rest of the trump racists from being ridiculously and pathetically desperate.

Your accusations against Donald are built from visiting, no charges have ever been filed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top