Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
LOL. Anything to distract from your hypocrisy, FoxNews boy? Can't say I blame you. I'd feel pretty silly right now if I got busted being that dumb. There's no shame in admitting you watch FoxNews.

You're too easy. Maybe that's why?

And, if you can quote anything, anywhere from me being supportive of ANY political party, I'll concede. Fair enough?
what hypocrisy? i have been very consistent.

it is you who is following me around like a lost puppy right now, and i haven't seen you do that to any of your fellow racist right wingers who cite fox news as if it were a holy scripture.

anyhoo, i am doubtless that you are a whiny pussy racist tight winger. so there's that too.
 

pabloesqobar

Well-Known Member
what hypocrisy? i have been very consistent.

it is you who is following me around like a lost puppy right now, and i haven't seen you do that to any of your fellow racist right wingers who cite fox news as if it were a holy scripture.

anyhoo, i am doubtless that you are a whiny pussy racist tight winger. so there's that too.
Because you are the most outspoken partisan fraud on this site. I understand you're embarassed and would like the attention shifted to someone else. I would too if I were in your shoes.

Probably stings a little?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Because you are the most outspoken partisan fraud on this site. I understand you're embarassed and would like the attention shifted to someone else. I would too if I were in your shoes.

Probably stings a little?
so you're not even gonna tell me why i'm a hypocrite? so sad.

i can tell you why you are one though. it also shines a bright light on exactly why you are undoubtedly a racist right wing type.
 

pabloesqobar

Well-Known Member
whose definition?
You seem really concerned about this. If you don't understand how it's hypocrital, why were you initially arguing that there was a BIG difference between citing the FoxNews site, as opposed to something on tv?

Your 1st (failed) protestation acknowledged your own hypocrisy.

I don't expect you're able to wrap your partisan brain around that tho.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You seem really concerned about this. If you don't understand how it's hypocrital, why were you initially arguing that there was a BIG difference between citing the FoxNews site, as opposed to something on tv?

Your 1st (failed) protestation acknowledged your own hypocrisy.

I don't expect you're able to wrap your partisan brain around that tho.
so you're not even gonna try to explain how it's hypocritical?

speaking of partisans, why not address even a single of your fellow racist righties for not only citing fox news, but actually believing what they have to say?

does it have anything to do with why you followed abe around for days because he said he was jewish and part black?

i bet it does.

probably also related to why you followed see4 around for days for calling forbes a bunch of right wing propaganda.

you have a major butthurt problem. don't commit suicide!
 

pabloesqobar

Well-Known Member
so you're not even gonna try to explain how it's hypocritical?

speaking of partisans, why not address even a single of your fellow racist righties for not only citing fox news, but actually believing what they have to say?

does it have anything to do with why you followed abe around for days because he said he was jewish and part black?

i bet it does.

probably also related to why you followed see4 around for days for calling forbes a bunch of right wing propaganda.

you have a major butthurt problem. don't commit suicide!
Meltdown much?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Passed in 1970, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the United States. It allows prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activity performed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) | Nolo.com
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/content/rico-act.html


woooooooooooops.

btw, flaming pile cites fox news all the time. just in case you needed any hot tips.
 

zeddd

Well-Known Member
so, do you think hes going to throw Mexicans over the wall or will he detain them for processing at fema camps, and who is going to take them when presumably they have no passports, will there be a no mans island for Mexican looking people without passports, shit could get racist pretty quickly
 

shorelineOG

Well-Known Member
so, do you think hes going to throw Mexicans over the wall or will he detain them for processing at fema camps, and who is going to take them when presumably they have no passports, will there be a no mans island for Mexican looking people without passports, shit could get racist pretty quickly
Do you believe in sovereignty? Mexico deports Hondurans. I see how great open borders has worked for the U.K., France and Germany.
 

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Do you believe in sovereignty? Mexico deports Hondurans. I see how great open borders has worked for the U.K., France and Germany.
yes im with you, im sorry you don't see my humour, my serious point is yes we need skilled immigration but secure borders. My concern is for the credibility of the Trump camp if they push this unprecedented mass detention/deportation, where are these people going to go?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top