Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
that shit makes you guys so upset that i may have to add it to my sig.

If the foo shits, wear it.
Bogus Meme Targets Trump
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/bogus-meme-targets-trump/
Q: Did Donald Trump tell People magazine in 1998 that if he ever ran for president, he’d do it as a Republican because “they’re the dumbest group of voters in the country” and that he “could lie and they’d still eat it up”?
A: No, that’s a bogus meme.


We’ll save you the effort. It is not an actual quote by Trump.

We scoured the Peoplemagazine archives and found nothing like this quote in 1998 or any other year.

And a public relations representative with People told us that the magazine couldn’t find anything like that quote in its archives, either. People‘s Julie Farin said in an email: “Peoplelooked into this exhaustively when it first surfaced back in Oct. We combed through every Trump story in our archive. We couldn’t find anything remotely like this quote –and no interview at all in 1998.”

 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
You all are so easy to sway. Show a video of trump saying republicans are the dumbest voters.

You cant. Its a meme based on fiction.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/10/08/trump.transcript/

TRUMP: I'm a registered Republican. I'm a pretty conservative guy. I'm somewhat liberal on social issues, especially health care, et cetera, but I'd be leaving another party, and I've been close to that party.
Actually, every day Trump proves that the people who voted for him as candidate are the dumbest ever. In that way, the meme is a metaphor for who Republicans are.
 

pabloesqobar

Well-Known Member
Federal records act. Uncle buck thinks it isnt a law tho. That is why pablo is making fun of him.
Yes. But they would prefer we not expose Bucks ignorance. Kinda like his absurd claim that the Trump University civil case was an indictment, which is criminal. Not the brightest guy. It's just too easy:

trump has been indicted and is under trial for violating the fucking RICO act. that is the candidate you support.
LOL. Wrong. The plaintiffs in a civil suit can't indict anyone or put anyone on trial for violating the RICO Act. The government does that. So far, they haven't.

Is he indicted yet? Is he indicted yet?
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Show me where I ever claimed Hillary broke a law. Please.
I didn't ask you that question. I asked, "What law has Hillary broken?"

upload_2016-6-25_15-4-50.png

Federal records act. Uncle buck thinks it isnt a law tho. That is why pablo is making fun of him.
Can you please cite specifically where Hillary Clinton broke the law and then please cite what the penalties are for breaking those particular laws or statutes.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Yes. But they would prefer we not expose Bucks ignorance. Kinda like his absurd claim that the Trump University civil case was an indictment, which is criminal. Not the brightest guy. It's just too easy:



LOL. Wrong. The plaintiffs in a civil suit can't indict anyone or put anyone on trial for violating the RICO Act. The government does that. So far, they haven't.

Is he indicted yet? Is he indicted yet?
Trump is named defendant in a Civil lawsuit to go to trial in November.
I don't really care what legal trivia you are so bent on arguing. The dude is scheduled for trials for fraud in New York and California.

As far as RICO are concerned, here are two references to RICO class actions and orders associated with this act. Once he loses his case, and the case for fraud under RICO is pretty good, according to the NY AG, RICO can be used to open up all the books for other leads in the case, so it won't be over.

http://zhlaw.com/cases/trump-university/
On October 27, 2014, the Court in a RICO class action against Donald Trump issued an Order granting class certification of a nationwide class of all students who purchased live event seminars from Trump University from January 1, 2007 to the present. For more information regarding this Order, please visit our blog here.

Also on February 21, 2014, the Southern District Court issued an Order denying Donald J. Trump’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Art Cohen’s RICO complaint against Trump asserting violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO Statute”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c).

Now then, for what has Hillary been charged?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ART COHEN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 13-cv-2519-GPC-WVG Related Case: 10-cv-0940-GPC-WVG ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; APPOINTING CLASS REPRESENTATIVE; AND APPOINTING CLASS COUNSEL

http://www.trumpuniversitylitigation.com/Content/Documents/Cohen Granting Motion for Class Certification.pdf

On October 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the above-captioned matter, alleging a single cause of action for mail and wire fraud in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c). Plaintiff claims that common evidence will prove that Defendant “sold real estate seminars and mentorships (‘LiveEvents’) through ‘Trump University,’which he marketed nationally as a premier institution of higher learning rivaling Wharton Business School and with which he was so integrally involved, students would effectively be learning from him.”
 
Last edited:

see4

Well-Known Member
Here @pabloesqobar and @Flaming Pie let me help you out.

There are a handful of laws or statutes Hillary Clinton COULD POTENTIALLY be prosecuted for:

18 US Code 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information -- The problem with this is she had the legal right to gather and transmit defense information. And there is no proof she lost information.

18 US Code 798 - Disclosure of classified information -- She never disclosed classified information, mainly because the information she received had not yet been classified.

18 US Code 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material -- Indeed she was unauthorized to retain the emails, but again, they were not yet classified.

18 US Code 1519 - Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations -- If this can be proven, which it has not yet, she could potentially get slapped with a misdemeanor.

18 US Code 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees -- Good luck proving that.

So there you have it. I've done the research for you. Now you no longer need to assume shit and believe what Fox News tells you.

And none of the above, even after a thorough investigation have been brought forward as charges against Hillary.

I'm really sorry that your Benghazi emails didn't work out for you.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
And what makes you think I would know? My personal belief, which I've previously shared . . . is that there is almost zero chance she gets indicted.
I agree. Almost zero chance she gets indicted. Because as the law stands today, she's maybe possibly potentially committed a misdemeanor that carries a small fine as penalty.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
And what makes you think I would know? My personal belief, which I've previously shared . . . is that there is almost zero chance she gets indicted.
Well, now that you've established that you don't care and nothing will happen to Hillary and all that stuff is made up shit, let's move on to Trump U and RICO, shall we?
 

Cannacat

Well-Known Member
Im voting to keep Britain in the EU.(next week).At the laST General Election.Both main parties were so similar.
I could barely drag myself 1/4 mile to the Polling station.I voted green party.They will never win in this screwed-up
country.
Me too! I don't meet many people I have either of those things in common with. Times have been tense recently :wall:
 

pabloesqobar

Well-Known Member
Well, now that you've established that you don't care and nothing will happen to Hillary and all that stuff is made up shit, let's move on to Trump U and RICO, shall we?
Except I never made up anything about Hillary, remember? You never claimed I did? But you are correct about the allegations in the complaint. But, like Hillary, he has never been indicted.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Except I never made up anything about Hillary, remember? You never claimed I did? But you are correct about the allegations in the complaint. But, like Hillary, he has never been indicted.
Civil trial dude, when did I say Trump had been indicted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top