Ok. I will respond. The wall is a functional and environmental disaster thst would not work and would never be built - by either candidate. It is a red herring that would appeal to only people as stupid as you. It is a litmus test for stupidity. You tested positive, Red.
1- you bypassed the education system, but its cool
Deplorable
Notice the avatar.....as with many repubs/alt-rights, it's his fantasy to be cucked out via a long thick cock.
Environmental? Bring on the stupid! Have I ever said a wall would appeal to me?
where are you going to put the wall on the texas border? in front of the rio grande, blocking our access to it? in the middle of the river? invade a sovereign nation and build it there?
So if the wall has some other purpose, what exactly is it?
I'm not building a wall. The Rio doesn't go all the way to the Pacific. Walls can have doors.
so like you to avoid an obvious question about the absurdity of your mental redtardation.
34 Senate seats and all 435 house seats are up for election on November 8, 2016. So I guess that and what another fellow said about state representatives and such.
I know. I still have not decided who I will be voting for for Vermont's 3rd district, Massachusetts 9th, or California 3rd, 6th and 19th.
Not to mention the fact that rivers move from time to time.
"A rational response" cmon catshit, rationality is of no interest to your battered pussy ass.
I answered your question. It wasn't about any absurdity of mine tho.
So more name calling with a little ascribing views I never expressed thrown in. Laughable.
This is name calling:
Breitbart proud!
