LOL - I was just gonna suggest you look into dielectric mirrors.dielectric mirrors- Such mirrors can easily reflect more than 99.9 percent--in extreme cases even more than 99.9999 percent--of the optical power.
![]()
If you use mirrors it may reflect poorly on you.Yeah, everyone diss's mirror but there's no real reason to think they would not be as effective as most other solutions. Biggest drawback is they are pricy.
LOL!!If you use mirrors it may reflect poorly on you.
LOL - I was just gonna suggest you look into dielectric mirrors.
Hmmm.... Seems reasonable....I found 51x51mm dielectric mirrors for $165 each. I would need 2220 of them. Cost to cover the walls with them: $366,300![]()
Broken mirrors in bathrooms are always cool too, but somehow they seem to stay in one piece if you attach them to a wall.Nothing like broken mirror in your buds.
Don't tell anyone, but I just tape aluminum foil to the walls of my veg box. (common noob mistake.. shhh)
I was wondering if it isn't actually better to put more diffuse reflective material towards the bottom. That would scatter some of the light back up to the plants instead of straight on to the floor, stems and pots.I'd imagine that anything toward the bottom of the walls won't really matter anyway unless you're trying to reflect far-red.
I was wondering if it isn't actually better to put more diffuse reflective material towards the bottom. That would scatter some of the light back up to the plants instead of straight on to the floor, stems and pots.
So highly direct reflective materials (like mirrors or silver mylar) on top and something diffuse lower down.
I have that in my grows now, just never measured if it actually works.
But as demonstrated above by the tests Rahz performed, flat white offers less reflection (in the direction of the plants) than more direct reflective materials like mirrors.
Why would't Mirrors reflect UV? The aluminium in mirrors is actually a really good reflector for the range of wavelengths below the PAR spectrum.