Dunn murder case in FL

kpmarine

kpmarine

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
What conflicted jury? Acquittal requires a unanimous vote.
Click to expand...
By the letter of the law, not the spirit. A juror can rule you aren't guilty and feel you should be guilty of something.

For example: I could shoot someone walking off my property with a particularly nice pair of shoes (Felony theft). I'm not guilty of murder, but shooting someone over shoes is still pretty damn wrong.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
kpmarine said:
By the letter of the law, not the spirit. A juror can rule you aren't guilty and feel you should be guilty of something.

For example: I could shoot someone walking off my property with a particularly nice pair of shoes (Felony theft). I'm not guilty of murder, but shooting someone over shoes is still pretty damn wrong.
Click to expand...
So it should be mob rule from now on?

The letter of the law doesnt satisfy you so it should be up for interpretation??
 
kpmarine

kpmarine

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
So it should be mob rule from now on?

The letter of the law doesnt satisfy you so it should be up for interpretation??
Click to expand...
If you don't think the law is up for interpretation, then you don't understand how our legal system works. Legal precedent is irrelevant in a system where only the letter of the law applies. Jury nullification become impossible too.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
kpmarine said:
If you don't think the law is up for interpretation, then you don't understand how our legal system works. Legal precedent is irrelevant in a system where only the letter of the law applies. Jury nullification become impossible too.
Click to expand...
The jury is instructed to follow the letter of the law but they can do whatever the fuck they want to do. It has been that way since our legal system was founded.

Somehow you seem to have sour grapes about particular verdicts and desire change due to that without realizing you have to take the good with the bad. Zimmerman defended himself and was acquitted by a jury. It is the way it is. OJ was acquitted. That chick who killed her kid was acquitted. Sometimes it is good and sometimes it is bad but it doesnt need to be changed just because you dont like a particular outcome.
 
kpmarine

kpmarine

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
The jury is instructed to follow the letter of the law but they can do whatever the fuck they want to do. It has been that way since our legal system was founded.

Somehow you seem to have sour grapes about particular verdicts and desire change due to that without realizing you have to take the good with the bad. Zimmerman defended himself and was acquitted by a jury. It is the way it is. OJ was acquitted. That chick who killed her kid was acquitted. Sometimes it is good and sometimes it is bad but it doesnt need to be changed just because you dont like a particular outcome.
Click to expand...
Jury nullification is acquittal when the jury thinks the defendant is actualy guilty. It's the letter vs. the spirit in action.Thanks for making my point that just because a jury declares you innocent doesn't mean you didn't do anything wrong though.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
kpmarine said:
Jury nullification is acquittal when the jury thinks the defendant is actualy guilty. It's the letter vs. the spirit in action.Thanks for making my point that just because a jury declares you innocent doesn't mean you didn't do anything wrong though.
Click to expand...
It does in the letter of the law...
 
MD914

MD914

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you still have not shown a single bit of evidence that he ever got into a fight though, and you never will. because prior to be being chased down by an unidentified stranger in the dark, he never did.

and no, we don't all get high here. desert dude doesn't, and he frequently wishes federal prison time on growers if they don't support his savior, rawn pawl. one time he taunted a member here with federal prison time and that grower got taken to federal prison that same day.
Click to expand...
Phone records...text messages with friends discussing fights...STILL irrelevant...and pretty common amongst teenage boys...I really don't understand why this got you so fired up...are your briefs too tight? :???:
http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/05/23/trayvon-martin-texted-about-fighting-marijuana-and-guns
 
MD914

MD914

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
I apologize on Uncle Bucks behalf. Desert dude is a racist troll. it gives him jollies to be a racist asshole. he also enjoys torturing small animals. At least according to this study:

Internet Trolls Really Are Horrible People

46.9k6.3k579
Narcissistic, Machiavellian, psychopathic, and sadistic.


http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/climate_desk/2014/02/internet_troll_personality_study_machiavellianism_narcissism_psychopathy.html
Click to expand...
You shouldn't apologize for somebody else's rudeness. It's admirable to stand up for something you believe in but there's a fine line between defending your cause and just being a dick...just sayin ;)
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MD914

MD914

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i really don't understand why you tried to tell an obvious lie about martin being suspended for fighting when he clearly wasn't. underwire digging in?
Click to expand...
No...my thong had a twist in it...the most uncomfortable feeling EVER :shock:
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MD914 said:
No...my thong had a twist in it...the most uncomfortable feeling EVER :shock:
Click to expand...
you've never had the joy of your balls getting sucked under and beneath your legs in a setting where the digging required to dislodge them would be all too obvious.
 
MD914

MD914

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you've never had the joy of your balls getting sucked under and beneath your legs in a setting where the digging required to dislodge them would be all too obvious.
Click to expand...
Uh...no sir :) But from your detailed description I gather you have :shock: Thanks for sharing :???:
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i really don't understand why you tried to tell an obvious lie about martin being suspended for fighting when he clearly wasn't. underwire digging in?
Click to expand...
I can't believe I am about to defend one of your philosophical brethren, but here goes:

MD was simply mistaken in what she posted. It happens, even to progressives. MD is a fellow Trayvon sycophant, Buck. You should apologize to her and accept her into your cult.
 
travisw

travisw

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
MD is a fellow Trayvon sycophant, Buck. You should apologize to her and accept her into your cult.
Click to expand...
[h=2]sy·co·phant[/h] noun \ˈsi-kə-fənt also ˈsī- & -ˌfant\: a person who praises powerful people in order to get their approval

????????????????????????????????????????????????????
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
travisw said:
sy·co·phant

noun\ˈsi-kə-fənt also ˈsī- & -ˌfant\: a person who praises powerful people in order to get their approval

????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Click to expand...
worshiper then. is that better?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top