Let me make it clear that I do believe in variations within species. Some dogs appear to have
evolved from large to small (or small to large), but no "evolution" has actually taken place.
They are still dogs.
So I do believe in something called "microevolution"--variation within a species.
However, there is no evidence for man evolving from primates, commonly known as "the theory
of evolution."
Professor Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research so
rightly stated:
"Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of
science. It is useless."
Sir Arthur Keith (Sir Arthur Keith wrote the foreword to the 100th edition of Origin of the
Species) said, "Evolution is unproved and unprovable."
Malcolm Muggeridge, the famous British journalist and philosopher said,
"I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been
applied, will be one of the great jokes in history books of the future." (The End of Christendom,
Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Mich., 1980, page 59).
Dr. T. N. Tah-misian of the Atomic Energy Commission said,
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story
they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever."
USA Today March 21, 2001
"Paleontologists have discovered a new skeleton in the closet of human ancestry that is likely to
force science to revise, if not scrap, current theories of human origins."
Reuters reported that the discovery left "scientists of human evolution…confused," saying,
"Lucy may not even be a direct human ancestor after all."
The phrase "scientists of human evolution" is an oxymoron.
Evolution isn't "scientific." It's a theory.
6
If you go to
www.raycomfort.com to will see an offer of $250,000.
Dr. Kent Hovind $250,000 "to anyone who can offer any scientific evidence that evolution is
true."
Take him to court. Become famous. Make this another Scopes trial.
But you won't, because you can't. All you have is faith in a theory.
Evolution is actually a religion.
Dictionary: "Religion": "A set of beliefs concerned with explaining the origins and purposes of
the universe…"
The belief of evolution even has its own religious language:
"We believe, perhaps, maybe, probably, could've, possibly."
The founding father of the faith is Charles Darwin.
The god of the religion of Darwinism is referred to by the faithful as "Mother Nature."
She is the one who is responsible for everything we can see in creation.
What's more, she's very attractive to sinful men. They gravitate to her like a moth to a flame.
Why? Because she's deaf, blind, and mute.
Mother Nature doesn't hear anything, she doesn't see anything, and what's most important--she
doesn't say anything.
Mother Nature doesn't have any moral dictates.
So, if you make her your creator, YOU CAN DO ANYTHING YOU WANT
…every sinful pleasure can be enjoyed with no qualms of conscience.
That's why evolution is so appealing.
7
Such a belief system is called "idolatry" (making up a non-existent god to suit yourself)
It is a transgression of the First and Second of the Ten Commandments.
To believe in the theory of evolution takes a great leap of bind faith.
Like little children, they believe without the need of a thread of evidence.
The theory doesn't disprove the existence of God.
It just reveals that those who believe it are truly capable of faith in the invisible…
and confirms Napoleon's great observation:
"Man will believe anything, as long as it's not in the Bible."
Thank you for listening. Please feel free to avail yourselves of the literature on the table.
