No, I'd say all of that stems from pandering to the racist vocal minority, one of his last overwhelmingly supportive demographics that remains. I seriously doubt the assumption that he would ever be able to get anything passed that would marginalize minorities and hispanics as that would require either the supreme court or congress, both of which are either openly against these views or have already established precedent in past hearings or adoptions of legislation.
You're saying that white people, like me, would be more inclined to vote for Clinton if we were black or hispanic because they have more to lose - in regards to safety, family and economic prospects - than white people
No, again, I'd say there are two main assumptions here: 1. you're assuming Trump would be able to get any policy that would marginalize minorities or hispanics passed and 2. that Trumps economic policies are negatively directed towards minorities and hispanics
Since I've already explained 1, I'll skip to 2. his economic plan calls for eliminating income taxes for the very bottom and drastically reducing income taxes for those at the very top; Reaganomics.. this hurts poor people, black, white, red, green, purple... poor. So white and black people who are poor have the same amount to lose in regards to his economic policy.
Most likely the pandering to the NitroHarleys and desertdudes of America
So black people hate Trump, OK, so that means that if I don't support the other candidate, I don't care about black people? What are you trying to say with this point?
Poor people don't like Clinton, does that mean if you don't support Sanders, you don't care about poor people? That's retarded