F*CK THE POLICE!!!

Fogdog

Well-Known Member

Is she trying to swat flys?
You seem to be unable to read through an entire message. There are three things needed to prove battery. Third in the list is "resulting in either bodily injury or an offensive touching."

She did not harm that officer nor was he offended by her touch, hence not charged with battery. You are wrong about this.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
You seem to be unable to read through an entire message. There are three things needed to prove battery. Third in the list is "resulting in either bodily injury or an offensive touching."

She did not harm that officer nor was he offended by her touch, hence not charged with battery. You are wrong about this.
So he gave her permission to punch him in the face?
 

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
So if a cop asks me out of my car.
I can just sit there and refuse?
YOU are an adult Chesus. This girl cannot even drive a car yet. Do you see the difference?

What am I saying, of course you don't.

After reading thousands of your hard-headed posts, I'd speculate that if we ever met, before we finished our first joint, I would have to pound your head on the concrete just to try to soften it up some.

:mrgreen:
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
HEY EVERYBODY
IF YOU GET PULLED OVER BY THE COPS AND THEY ASK YOU TO STEP OUT OF THE CAR
JUST SIT THERE AND DONT MOVE
ONLY DO THIS IF YOU ARE BLACK THOUGH
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
YOU are an adult Chesus. This girl cannot even drive a car yet. Do you see the difference?

What am I saying, of course you don't.

After reading thousands of your hard-headed posts, I'd speculate that if we ever met, before we finished our first joint, I would have to pound your head on the concrete just to try to soften it up some.

:mrgreen:
That would be fucking awesome hardass. Since I boxed professionally for 3 years. I would love to debate with you

btw the girl is 16 and she is old enough to drive
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
YOU are an adult Chesus. This girl cannot even drive a car yet. Do you see the difference?

What am I saying, of course you don't.

After reading thousands of your hard-headed posts, I'd speculate that if we ever met, before we finished our first joint, I would have to pound your head on the concrete just to try to soften it up some.

:mrgreen:
Awe shit.

I'm wrong. The child that got arrested is actually a SENIOR in High school. That makes her near or over the age of 18.
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
So if a cop asks me out of my car.
I can just sit there and refuse?
What does this have to do with the girl that was beaten?
So he gave her permission to punch him in the face?
You are seeing things. Now you are claiming she was let off from battery charges -- because she is black. You are claiming reverse discrimination over the false impression that the girl committed the crime of battery. I point out to you that battery involves more than what the girl did. There is not a shred of discussion by anybody involved saying that she harmed that officer. Hence, no battery charges. Hence I call you a fool, perhaps a racist fool for falsely claiming reverse discrimination.

What should have been a relatively minor event at school turned into a national story because the officer acted out of a line and blew the situation up. The girl was wrong to disrupt the class and to disobey the officer, nobody says otherwise. That officer beat her for her failure to obey his orders. School officials and police officials agree the officer's actions were wrong.

Somehow you see it differently but you make no sense.

Nobody but you are claiming battery, including the people involved -- this includes the police officer that you say was, lol, punched. Get over yourself. You weren't there, you don't really know anything. You seem to be upset that an unwarranted beating of a black child led to greater punishment of the police officer than the punishment of the teen. You are wrong about this.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
What does this have to do with the girl that was beaten?

You are seeing things. Now you are claiming she was let off from battery charges -- because she is black. You are claiming reverse discrimination over the false impression that the girl committed the crime of battery. I point out to you that battery involves more than what the girl did. There is not a shred of discussion by anybody involved saying that she harmed that officer. Hence, no battery charges. Hence I call you a fool, perhaps a racist fool for falsely claiming reverse discrimination.

What should have been a relatively minor event at school turned into a national story because the officer acted out of a line and blew the situation up. The girl was wrong to disrupt the class and to disobey the officer, nobody says otherwise. That officer beat her for her failure to obey his orders. School officials and police officials agree the officer's actions were wrong.

Somehow you see it differently but you make no sense.

Nobody but you are claiming battery, including the people involved -- this includes the police officer that you say was, lol, punched. Get over yourself. You weren't there, you don't really know anything. You seem to be upset that an unwarranted beating of a black child led to greater punishment of the police officer than the punishment of the teen. You are wrong about this.
Tell me when I said the cop should of not been fired?
Doesn't excuse her behavior or exonerate her from getting charged for her offenses
Reverse discrimination?
There was no discrimination when he went to arrest her. And that was only after he asked her several times to get up.
Should he of bought her an ice cream and maybe got down on his knees and begged her to get up?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Tell me when I said the cop should of not been fired?
Doesn't excuse her behavior or exonerate her from getting charged for her offenses
Reverse discrimination?
There was no discrimination when he went to arrest her. And that was only after he asked her several times to get up.
Should he of bought her an ice cream and maybe got down on his knees and begged her to get up?
"Tell me when I said the cop should of not been fired?"

Tell me where I said you said the cop should not have been fired. Sheesh, I feel like I'm talking to an eight year old.

You are the one that said: "why didn't the girl get charged with battery to a police officer?". Basically, my answer was "because it wasn't battery". Don't like my answer? Got a better one that fits the facts?

You like the ice cream scenario. It might work but I prefer the idea of moving her desk into the hallway.

You are wrong about this.
 
Top