find your government reps
- Thread starter FishHooks
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yes you did, you lying little weasel.
substitute obama for hillary and it's the exact same thing.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i didn't bring up delegate rich states, you did. you little fucking weasel.
Poor poor Buck.
this is pretty funny.
Except it's not. There's a reason you aren't arguing with demographic information and delegate counts: quantitatively you have zilch. I backed up my assertions with evidence. You've backed up yours in this discussion with nothing.
All because you didn't and apparently still don't want to admit that black people voted for Obama based on his race. It is astonishing.
How many times do I have to say it? The 10 whitest states you're trumpeting are worth far less delegates than the ten blackest states, because they contain 5% and 20% of the American population, respectively. I already told you what I meant by "delegate rich," so pretending you don't know in order to avoid making any real point is rather empty.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
9/11 was obviously a conspiracy.
some nutbars in sandland wanted to strike the Great Satan, but they didnt have the balls to do it in a civilized manner, so they hijacked airliners and few em into the world trade center.
it was carefully planned, well financed and utterly evil, so yes, conspiracies do happen.
if you are insinuating that GWB and dick cheney were the scheming plotters and it was all a false flag attack to serve the interest of some shadowy secret agenda by the "illuminati" (read as Das Juden) then youre full of shit.
just tell me which of the 9 re-edits of Loose Change you think is the real deal and ill demolish it's claims point by point for you.
echelon1k1
New Member
http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/inside-the-saudi-911-coverup/
Bush, Cheney and half their staffers have a lot to answer for
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you invented your own definition of "delegate rich" to weasel out of your own fail argument once i pointed out that hillary won the top 10 delegate rich states (save obama's home state), all of which have substantial black populations, but even far more substantial white populations.
obama won the top 10 whitest states in the union. probably because he is white.
hillary won one of the blackest states in the union. according to your fail logic, she couldn't have done that if she were white. good thing hillary is black.
your constant whining about black people taking what you feel belongs to white people is completely transparent.
go ahead and tell me that you are not bignbushy's little brother, i can use a laugh.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hillary lost the 10 whitest states in the union because she is black, and thus she lost the nomination.
go cry. call them race traitors. do whatever it is that racists like you do to cope with the fact that the world is changing and you are frightened by it.
My meaning should be clear from the context of what I said. You're arguing about language because you have no other crutch to stand on.
Black voters in the primary for the states with the most delegates:
California - 6%
New York - 14%
Florida - 19%
Illinois - 23%
Ohio - 18%
Penn - 13%
Texas - 19%
Michigan - no data
New Jersey - 24%
North Carolina - 33%
Hmm. Notice anything?
White voters obviously didn't vote based on race. Obama beat Hillary on white men in many states.
I never argued it was impossible. It means Obama did particularly poorly among white voters in the state, because Hillary certainly didn't do particularly well with black voters. Are you telling us the white Democratic primary voters in Tennessee were racist? Because they were most averse to voting for a black man.
Again, anyone reading this knows that it has nothing to do with the primary "belonging" to anyone. I keep saying that I want to hear you indict black voters for voting based on race, after you assailed white people for supposedly doing it, and you refuse. We can see you for the hypocrite you are.
White voters obviously didn't vote based on race. Black voters obviously did. That's why 80-90% of them in every single state voted for Obama.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yes they did, as much as black voters did.
you're bitter because you feel like obama took what belonged to a white person, just the same as you invented a lie about how a black person took your spot in college.
i promise you are bignbushy's little brother. raised racist to be racist.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
why?
black voters vote in droves for the better candidate every time, hence why they vote 90% democrat no matter the skin color of the candidate.
white people do vote based on race, especially in the racist southern shithole that produced the likes of you and your big brother bignbushy.
why else would the rest of the nation, including utah, vote more democratic, while the souoth suddenly falls in love with lax mccain's immigration stance?
i bet it had nothing to do with obama being black, because like you said, white people don't vote based on race.
you are a racist dipshit. go back to devryU.
Obama won the majority of the white male vote, Buck. Obama won 80-90% of the black vote. Conclusions? White voters obviously did not vote based on race, because they didn't skew 80-90% for Hillary, who was white. But black voters did skew 80-90% for Obama, who was black. How else can you explain it? The only plausible explanation is that black voters voted based on race. The skew is otherwise unprecedented.
We're talking about the Democratic primary. The skew in the black vote only makes sense if it is based on race.
white people do vote based on race, especially in the racist southern shithole that produced the likes of you and your big brother bignbushy.
why else would the rest of the nation, including utah, vote more democratic, while the souoth suddenly falls in love with lax mccain's immigration stance?
i bet it had nothing to do with obama being black, because like you said, white people don't vote based on race.
you are a racist dipshit. go back to devryU.
I love that you're now contradicting your own argument about Tennessee with this chart. The black vote didn't push Obama over there, which you claim to be proof of your theory that it wasn't the key to his victory. But damn, look at how red Tennessee is in your graphic--it's one of the reddest states! What does that say about white voters in Tennessee and their unwillingness to vote for a black man? Think that might be why Hillary won there?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so it looks like white voters DO vote based on race, according to you.
they also DON'T vote based on race, according to you.
make up your mind, you racist retard.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i already did, they voted for the better candidate.
so it looks like white voters DO vote based on race, according to you.
they also DON'T vote based on race, according to you.
make up your mind, you racist retard.
In Tennessee, Buck. Did you not bother to read anything I just said? You're trumpeting Tennessee as the proof that my thesis is wrong, and then you post that graphic showing Tennessee to supposedly be one of the most racist states in voting.
White voters made up 67% of the electorate in Tennessee's Democratic primary. They overwhelmingly voted for Hillary Clinton. This was not the case in other states.
If you're going to be the racism police you need to call out all racism everywhere, not just racism by people on the right. This is blatant hypocrisy on your part. 80-90% of black voters vote for for Obama in THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY, versus Hillary Clinton, whose husband was one of the most popular politicians in the black community ever, and you tell us it has nothing to do with race. It's baffling and silly. I'm embarrassed for you.
Similar threads
