UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so close to an actual thought in english, but just more retarded bible thumper jibberish.
you bible thumping idiots make life worth laughing about.
Firearms Freindly Collective?
- Thread starter ProdigalSun
- Start date
you bible thumping idiots make life worth laughing about.
ProdigalSun
Well-Known Member
THe people I love, at least when they are around me, are protected from firearms, with them. You can't get the criminals guns from them, therefore, you need to be able to protect yourself from them when they bring their guns. I'm a happy farmer too, I just happen to enjoy shooting, and the need to keep the wolves at bay.
TheMan13
Well-Known Member
... that arguing with ignorance is futile.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the overwhelming majority of americans support an assault rifle ban, magazine capacity limits, a national gun registry, and universal background checks.
and even the four conservative justices on the supreme court have said that such things are perfectly consistent with the second amendment.
these are the facts. i'll excuse you so you may cry in your cornflakes now.
ozfarmerjoe
Member
hey all,
well it appears that we'll have to live with and accept each others opposing positions on gun control measures or lack of control measures. we could go around in circles forever on this one.
my last comment on this would have to be: i think the proposals forwarded for gun control in the u.s. are entirely reasonable. i cannot for the life of me see why a background check on a persons character, mental illnesses or dodgy past is opposed! seems like so much common sense to me.
australia has strict gun controls and as of yet we haven't been over run by marauders. few guns in our community and i feel very very safe.
i may not agree with the pro gun position but you do indeed have the right to your own opinion... hopefully exhibited without malice directed at those who's opinions don't tally with yours.
well it appears that we'll have to live with and accept each others opposing positions on gun control measures or lack of control measures. we could go around in circles forever on this one.
my last comment on this would have to be: i think the proposals forwarded for gun control in the u.s. are entirely reasonable. i cannot for the life of me see why a background check on a persons character, mental illnesses or dodgy past is opposed! seems like so much common sense to me.
australia has strict gun controls and as of yet we haven't been over run by marauders. few guns in our community and i feel very very safe.
i may not agree with the pro gun position but you do indeed have the right to your own opinion... hopefully exhibited without malice directed at those who's opinions don't tally with yours.
TheMan13
Well-Known Member
I have no problem with background checks, but in reality the tons of recent laws already out there in reference to healthcare privacy make it a joke. To write laws mandating a record search you have already made illegal to search is as absurd as UncleBuck and just as irrelevant to anything productive.
DaleRoberts
Well-Known Member
I bet Buck is a fat middle aged guy who rarely has seen pussy...unless we are talking via the net.
Anyone who's that much of prick leads a lonely existence.
Anyone who's that much of prick leads a lonely existence.
TheMan13
Well-Known Member
Have you been to the west coast
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
go ahead and chase your slavery bunnies as if it had something to do with the issue.
you are correct, me saying it will never make it true. but when the SCOTUS says it, that does.
you're welcome, ma'am.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller#Decision
now go post some more videos to prove your astounding intellect.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
6'2'', 190, still in my twenties, and just got done with a nice session with the wife.
where's your sky daddy now?
ProdigalSun
Well-Known Member
The restrictions proposed would ban every gun in the country except bolt action rifles, a few shotguns, and revolvers over 6 shots, and you think that is reasonable?
As far as background checks go, the ones we have now, go unprosecuted when a criminal is found with one. The criminal is not going to go to the local PD and request a background check on his buddy riff raf. They are going to sell to each other quietly. All background checks really are, is a way to register law abiding citizens, ubless confiscation is the goal, the effort is expensive, and by definition, fruitless. Legally speaking, the background check can only be applied to the law abiding, because if it were applied to the criminal, it would be in violation of his fourth and fifth amendment rights, and therefore inadmissable against them. There is a Supreme court decision on that already.
TheMan13
Well-Known Member
6'2'', 190, still in my twenties, and just got done with a nice session with the wife.
where's your sky daddy now?
... you forgot about your mad Guitar Hero skillz brah
In a male same sex marriage is the "wife" the "catcher"
ProdigalSun
Well-Known Member
eww Almost as disturbing as gun control advocates themselves.
