Gay Marriage Ruling Cited To Overturn Ban On Polygamy

http://jonathanturley.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/brown-summary-judgment-decision.pdf

TLDR Version:

Federal Judge: "If Gay Marriage prohibitions are unconstitutional, then polygamy bans are unconstitutional too."

and yes, he was appointed by Boooosh, but was confirmed by the senate in 2008, with a senate majority held by democrats, under the fearsome gaze of Harry Reid.

lulz.

Dr Kynes said:

http://jonathanturley.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/brown-summary-judgment-decision.pdf

TLDR Version:

Federal Judge: "If Gay Marriage prohibitions are unconstitutional, then polygamy bans are unconstitutional too."

and yes, he was appointed by Boooosh, but was confirmed by the senate in 2008, with a senate majority held by democrats, under the fearsome gaze of Harry Reid.

lulz.

Click to expand...

That means Obama will be able to show his other wives publicly then.

(Well, as long as they're covered up)

Harrekin said:

That means Obama will be able to show his other wives publicly then.

(Well, as long as they're covered up)

Click to expand...

ohh if only Bwana Obama were a secret moslem...

too bad he appears to be a Closeted Mormon, and thats twice as crazy and dangerous.

what's wrong with polygamy?

If you like your wives, you can keep your wives?

YES!!

I think if there were more vocal advocates for "plural marriage" with a solid reasoning, I would agree.

To my, albeit limited, knowledge, the only major groups shooting for polygamy in America are the FLDS. And their track record is riddled with pedophilia and small-town theocracy, so I kinda discount them. Not on principle, but its been pretty well documented they take teen wives and the overall situation is horrible for the women.

But If a polygamist sect was petitioning the govt that wasn't predicated on horrible things like that, then yes I would support them. It makes the tax and estate situation incredibly mucked up but it should be looked at in earnest at least.

But then again I think all people should pay their fair share in taxes. Married or not. Kids or not. Poor or not. Though obviously in proportion. But everyone should chip in, at least in my mind. Terrible example, but who likes the guy at the bar always ready for you to buy shots, but never buys you a round?

ginwilly said:

YES!!

Click to expand...

That's weird, everyone is color coded, must mean each family; one is brown, one is yellow, one is orange. Weird.

NoDrama said:

That's weird, everyone is color coded, must mean each family; one is brown, one is yellow, one is orange. Weird.

Click to expand...

Check out the girl-next-door on the far right though. Girl is stacked.

They said this would never happen... LOL!!!

It isnt fair that you cannot marry your goldfish! Discrimination is rampant in America. Damn humanists...

NLXSK1 said:

It isnt fair that you cannot marry your goldfish!

Click to expand...

so you found a way to make goldfish consent to your sexual advances?

we really didn't have any idea what you were capable of.

NLXSK1 said:

They said this would never happen... LOL!!!

It isnt fair that you cannot marry your goldfish! Discrimination is rampant in America. Damn humanists...

Click to expand...

Shouldnt you be saying "its an issue for the States" in order to toe party line?

Harrekin said:

Shouldnt you be saying "its an issue for the States" in order to toe party line?

Click to expand...

he's waiting for dean chambers to tell him what to think.

Harrekin said:

Shouldnt you be saying "its an issue for the States" in order to toe party line?

Click to expand...

I have said consistently and repeatedly that we need to get government out of marriage so it is not even an issue.

If the government was not busy micro-managing our lives maybe we could figure some of this shit out for ourselves.

NLXSK1 said:

I have said consistently and repeatedly that we need to get government out of marriage so it is not even an issue.

If the government was not busy micro-managing our lives maybe we could figure some of this shit out for ourselves.

Click to expand...

and then you could go about fucking barely sentient fish with your tiny, tiny penis.

UncleBuck said:

what's wrong with polygamy?

Click to expand...

Q: What is the maximum penalty for bigamy?
A: Two mothers-in-law.

Dr Kynes said:

http://jonathanturley.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/brown-summary-judgment-decision.pdf

TLDR Version:

Federal Judge: "If Gay Marriage prohibitions are unconstitutional, then polygamy bans are unconstitutional too."

and yes, he was appointed by Boooosh, but was confirmed by the senate in 2008, with a senate majority held by democrats, under the fearsome gaze of Harry Reid.

lulz.

Click to expand...

no, plural marriage is not the same..um, yeah.

schuylaar said:

no, plural marriage is not the same..um, yeah.

Click to expand...

It's an attempt to engage a slippery-slope argument. Gay marriage = polygamy = banging baked goods = anything that isn't Wonder Bread in bed.



ooooo.

Trust me, Americans dont even know what bread is.

That sweetened shite?

Come on now.

cannabineer said:

Q: What is the maximum penalty for bigamy?
A: Two mothers-in-law.

Click to expand...