Gay wedding cakes and the bigots who won't bake them.

twostrokenut · Mar 5, 2014

UncleBuck said:
you're the one who claimed "its [SIC] federal law".

i'm still waiting on you to show me that federal law.

by the way, i'm glad all of these hateful bigots ate on YOUR side, and not mine.

You will be waiting a while for that cart to pull that horse.
First order of buisness is justifying your ad-hom racist bigot bullshit with
something other than your emotional vagina.

My name is kunta, pull your own buggy or pay me a mutually agreed amount to pull it.

UncleBuck · Mar 5, 2014

you're an idiot, twostroke.

you literally said that you "don't think it's a good idea" to end the racist practices of the south.

still waiting on that federal law, too.

BigNBushy · Mar 5, 2014

UncleBuck said:
you're the one who claimed "its [SIC] federal law".

i'm still waiting on you to show me that federal law.

by the way, i'm glad all of these hateful bigots ate on YOUR side, and not mine.

I'm one of those hateful bigots you're talking about, and you're echoing my points in this thread, that denying services to homosexuals because "you're a Christian" is complete bull shit.

You are on the same side as a hateful racist bigot. Lulz

UncleBuck · Mar 5, 2014

BigNBushy said:
I'm one of those hateful bigots you're talking about, and you're echoing my points in this thread, that denying services to homosexuals because "you're a Christian" is complete bull shit.

You are on the same side as a hateful racist bigot. Lulz

my argument has nothing to do with your silly book of fairy tales, subway.

my argument is that sexual orientation is a civil right, just like skin color.

twostrokenut · Mar 5, 2014

That was explained very well in a nice thoughtful post....you select a quoted it
for ad hom purposes.

I don't think walls of legislation are a good idea...ever....especially when there are already simple
Individual UNLIMITED rights that can be simply claimed.

I have tried to explain this many times to you....same with civil rights, lawful cannabis,
lawful money, lawful taxes ect....so I'm totally over it, you are the lone voice.

The nutter with the bullhorn on a pulpit in the park in regards to this.

Before this it was the presidential "racial slur" you have yet to produce.
You don't produce a good or service, you will not be paid by me any longer.

UncleBuck · Mar 5, 2014

twostrokenut said:
That was explained very well in a nice thoughtful post....

i asked you directly if you thought that ending the racist practices that the south refused to end on their own was a good idea.

you said, and i quote, that you don't "think it's a good idea" to end the racist practices of the south.

it's very plain and simple and requires no federal reserve conspiracies, numbnuts.

now show me the federal law you said existed.

BigNBushy · Mar 5, 2014

UncleBuck said:
my argument has nothing to do with your silly book of fairy tales, subway.

my argument is that sexual orientation is a civil right, just like skin color.

Sexual orientation is not a civil right because the federal government has not said it was, and therefore it cannot be called so, by you.

So you're just making shit up.

It doesn't matter how we get there, you got to the same place as me, that these fucks are wrong and they need have no real defense to not baking the cake.

How does it feel to be on the same side as a rational human being?

Wavels · Mar 5, 2014

Well, let’s say, for illustrative purposes, that an atheist gay couple owns a bakery.
Some Westboro Baptist Church members attempt to patronize this bakery and want to have a cake baked on which they request many of their hateful and wackadoodle slogans be emblazoned.
Should the gay bakers comply?
And if they do not want to, should the Government compel them to do so?

I admit to extreme ambivalence on this issue.
It is not that easy.

UncleBuck · Mar 5, 2014

UncleBuck said:
sexual orientation is a civil right

BigNBushy said:
Sexual orientation is not a civil right...How does it feel to be on the same side as a rational human being?

you are not rational. until you show me some slaves on planes, you are a historical revisionist in addition to being a white supremacist, heroin junky, thief (from your own family, no less) and subway sandwich maker.

many states have made sexual orientation and gender identity a civil right, as usual, the south lags behind and will probably continue to until the federal government kicks your asses into the new century and makes you give up your harmful, bigoted practices by force.

because that's usually the only way to deal with bigoted cowards like you guys.

twostrokenut · Mar 5, 2014

UncleBuck said:
i asked you directly if you thought that ending the racist practices that the south refused to end on their own was a good idea.

you said, and i quote, that you don't "think it's a good idea" to end the racist practices of the south.

it's very plain and simple and requires no federal reserve conspiracies, numbnuts.

now show me the federal law you said existed.

Look dude we are out of fantasy bipartisan land and deep in the real world of economic laws
of supply and demand.
Not the black market mind you so your kneecaps are safe.
Pay me my Money or become a victim of delusions and fuck off.
AMF.

UncleBuck · Mar 5, 2014

Wavels said:
Well, let’s say, for illustrative purposes, that an atheist gay couple owns a bakery.
Some Westboro Baptist Church members attempt to patronize this bakery and want to have a cake baked on which they request many of their hateful and wackadoodle slogans be emblazoned.
Should the gay bakers comply?
And if they do not want to, should the Government compel them to do so?

I admit to extreme ambivalence on this issue.
It is not that easy.

people are not born holding a "god hates fags" sign like they are born with a sexual orientation.

your argument immediately fails because it is patently retarded in that way.

just give up.

UncleBuck · Mar 5, 2014

twostrokenut said:
Look dude I don't think it's a good idea.

twostrokenut · Mar 5, 2014

Wavels said:
Well, let’s say, for illustrative purposes, that an atheist gay couple owns a bakery.
Some Westboro Baptist Church members attempt to patronize this bakery and want to have a cake baked on which they request many of their hateful and wackadoodle slogans be emblazoned.
Should the gay bakers comply?
And if they do not want to, should the Government compel them to do so?

I admit to extreme ambivalence on this issue.
It is not that easy.

Can an atheist actually have a religious belief?

Wavels · Mar 5, 2014

UncleBuck said:
people are not born holding a "god hates fags" sign like they are born with a sexual orientation.

your argument immediately fails because it is patently retarded in that way.

just give up.

Have you been drinking? I am not arguing, I said I was ambivalent on this issue, as it is not really cut and dried IMO.
And you neglected to answer my questions as per usual.
I am more on your side on this topic than usual.
Knee jerk much Buck?

jahbrudda · Mar 5, 2014

Wavels said:
Well, lets say, for illustrative purposes, that an atheist gay couple owns a bakery.
Some Westboro Baptist Church members attempt to patronize this bakery and want to have a cake baked on which they request many of their hateful and wackadoodle slogans be emblazoned.
Should the gay bakers comply?
And if they do not want to, should the Government compel them to do so?

I admit to extreme ambivalence on this issue.
It is not that easy.

Should a Jewish owned bakery be forced to bake a cake for a nazi customer?
Or an African American owned bakery be mandated to make a cake for a skin head?
Hell no.

fr3d12 · Mar 5, 2014

jahbrudda said:
Should a Jewish owned bakery be forced to bake a cake for a nazi customer?
Or an African American owned bakery be mandated to make a cake for a skin head?
Hell no.

I agree they shouldn't but people aren't born Nazi's or Skinheads and it is a choice they make in life to become Nazi or skinhead.
Being gay isn't a lifestyle choice.

twostrokenut · Mar 5, 2014

jahbrudda said:
Should a Jewish owned bakery be forced to bake a cake for a nazi customer?
Or an African American owned bakery be mandated to make a cake for a skin head?
Hell no.

You're kind of losing me a bit.
Jewish is a religion and a belief might be one against mass genocide idk....

I fail to understand how simply being black in america might be construed a religion though.

UncleBuck · Mar 5, 2014

Wavels said:
Have you been drinking? I am not arguing, I said I was ambivalent on this issue, as it is not really cut and dried IMO.
And you neglected to answer my questions as per usual.
I am more on your side on this topic than usual.
Knee jerk much Buck?

you didn't have a valid question, just a retarded and false analogy.

UncleBuck · Mar 5, 2014

jahbrudda said:
Should a Jewish owned bakery be forced to bake a cake for a nazi customer?
Or an African American owned bakery be mandated to make a cake for a skin head?
Hell no.

no one is born a nazi or a skin head, same retarded and false analogy.

i would encourage you idiots to use your heads, but the level of misunderstanding that i am witnessing is probably already at the extent of your limited mental faculties.

UncleBuck · Mar 5, 2014

twostrokenut said:
You're kind of losing me a bit.
Jewish is a religion and a belief might be one against mass genocide idk....

I fail to understand how simply being black in america might be construed a religion though.

witness the idiocy that ensues when an idiot tries to humor another idiot's idiotic analogy.

Gay wedding cakes and the bigots who won't bake them.

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads