jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
I didn't make that claim, other scientists did, are you going to argue the point that some say 15 years (like the scientis you cited) vs 17 years by others?
You don't consider that petty?
"global warming petition project" peer reviewed and everything???
- Thread starter tobinates559
- Start date
You don't consider that petty?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
can you even name one actual scientist who says that temps have not increased in the last 17 years in the face of the fact that the last decade was the hottest on record?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
To buck, petty is normal.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Aw Umadbro? Have I even called you a name?
You got snotsauce.
Here's some good ones, Enjoy!
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You're posting the claim that the Earth hasn't warmed in the last 17 years to support your theory that climate change ins't man made
You've been claiming this entire thread that there's not enough information to conclude if climate change is anthropogenic, yet here you are using one single scientists likely politically motivated opinion to conclude it isn't
Tens of thousands of peer reviewed research papers over 2 decades - Not enough evidence
ONE politically motivated opinion - NOPE! NOT HAPPENING!!
Again, you are a fucking idiot
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Aw don't be mad. How about the funding I cited for you, a bit larger than your Koch brothers conspiracy bullcrap eh?
If you're losing an argument no need to resort to personal insults.
Whats my candidate again?
Got a quote for that?
Oh then there is that matter of a user named UncleBuck at stormfront.
If you're losing an argument no need to resort to personal insults.
Whats my candidate again?
Got a quote for that?
Oh then there is that matter of a user named UncleBuck at stormfront.
And you are encouraging hits to a racist site? That's lame.
jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
Tens of thousands you say, then back that up with a citation.
And we'll see how you are so easily misguided.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Why would I bother doing that when I already proved you refuse to accept anything as proof?
There's literally nothing I could show you that would change your mind and that doesn't sound alarm bells in your head because you don't understand how science works
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
not only that, but he's also claiming that it HAS warmed in the last 15 years, but not in the last 17.
he backs it all up with citations from the heartland institute, a group that takes money from exxonmobil and the koch brothers to deny climate change (mere decades after taking money from tobacco and telling people cigarettes weren't dangerous).
when he's not citing paid for political groups, he's citing political scientists who worked for rush limbaugh and bemoaning the politicization of the issue.
it's just pure poetry in motion.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's already been cited in this thread, are you fucking blind?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Stop patting yourself on the back. You didn't "prove" anything. Somehow your failure to convince anybody is an excuse to not provide a citation? Admit it. You got nothing.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Exactly, I just don't get it, man.. It's almost like a cartoon or something..
Every single source he goes to has a clear political motivation. He doesn't bother going to the thousands of independent researchers who study the climate, THEY'RE all bought off by the government.
This is where my interest in human psychology comes in, I find it extremely interesting how someone in our culture with unlimited resources for information could dig themselves in so deep. It's gotta be a sort of situation where the flux of information has just overwhelmed his brain, his political bias is way too strong for him to ever admit something that goes against anything he already believes might be wrong, whereas you and me are totally welcome to the idea. For example, I can tell you what it would take for me to accept anthropogenic climate change isn't real - a peer reviewed study by real scientists who don't have a political bias or conflict of interest, that's it! When 97% of the science is against you, all you're left with is to claim a liberal bias. He has literally nothing to show for himself in the way of evidence, not a shred.
It's almost funny how he's being strung around by such evil fucks like the koch brothers and the Limbaugh crowd because of how arrogant he is with this shit. Being manipulated like a slave and not even aware of it, I take a sick kind of pleasure in knowing that, I have to admit..
You and me both know these mindsets will die off in 20 years at the most, then, you'll never hear about how a gay person was discriminated against for being gay just like how today we don't hear about how colored people should use different drinking fountains. The scientifically illiterate, racist, sexist bigots will be gone and dumb shit like denying climate change won't be taken seriously in any context.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Kinda hard to convince someone of something if they refuse to accept the accepted evidence you show them, it's a waste of my time. You've been shown the evidence, you've been shown the facts, the charts, the tables, the numbers.. what more do you want? 97% of the worlds scientists are convinced, you remain unconvinced. At this point, it's no longer anyone's prerogative to convince anyone of anything. Those that would be convinced already are, those that aren't can run their SUV's til their hearts content. There are so few of them they could literally do it 24/7 and it wouldn't make one fuck bit of difference in the big picture.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
You mean the evidence you're refusing to cite and pretending it somehow is our fault?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
The DOE tells me I'm quite useful every other week.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Don't get upset because you don't understand how science works. Study science, stop being an idiot
Review the thread, it's been cited. Dummies like you don't accept it because it goes against your beliefs. I on the other hand would accept evidence to the contrary if you could provide it, let alone fucking tell me what it would be, idiot
So all you're good for is making other people money now? (prostitute)
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what about your family?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it wouldn't be so funny if he didn't rail against politicizing climate science. the fact that he bemoans the politicization and then posts 100% political groups is just beyond funny.