No, I was illustrating the idea that you don't need to have seen something first hand to prove it
Do you think that nothing in science can be proven without seeing it firsthand first?
https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm
Are you saying the only thing that proves the theory of evolution is that we don't have anything better?
That's the opposite of ACC?
OK, so what are they?
1) I will match resumes with you. And pay checks. But, I can't think of a suitable penalty.
2) I don't care for your mealy mouth, horse ass approach, and I have nothing to prove to you.
3) Are you saying if there was other evidence to contradict Evolution, we would
not be disputing Evolution in Science? You are just too dumb about this.
4) Are you saying because we dig up a very incomplete set of bone clues, that proves Anything? You don't realize, that we simply
don't have a Current Contradiction to the Current Understanding of Evolution? If we had one we would Contradict. Science is not belief and recant.
You are not even an adult thinker. You think a political poll is the same as the rigors of science.
You think we can't find something tomorrow, that sets Evolution's face in the mud.
You want to challenge me for what would be evidence of Actual Warming, (not even AGW) and never say a word, that I did.
Yet, you cannot come up with a sliver of actual evidence that Woman is warming the planet.
You are not up for this. Not but blind and ignorant about it all. HA Haaaaaa.
