Bob's rabbit doesn't poop. Look at it, it's cute as hell. It just rolls joints and plays music for him.he has to pay his own expenses and clean his own rabbit shit up. lmao
Timmah and I have never really dis agreed on what we would like to happen...just about how to go about making it happen. He's been more of a stop the laws from beiong amended guy, and I'm a help them amend them favorably guy.I leave the fucking house for one day Bob and this happens!!! What, are you guys roommates now? j/k lmao. I did have to read that shit twice though.
Kind of..kind of not. They were simply people that did stuff that stretched the law to test it's limits. What they did was going to get them arrested, and in my mind was foolish. They brought the situations upon themselves. Some of them won't even benifit from the new rulings....The ruling for section 4 and 8 defenses beiing available to anyone with a doctors recomendation, dosen't apply to the case that caused the ruling.Turns out alot of the people that I have referenced in the past, King being one of them , as victims of the system were not such criminals after all.....
HHHMMMMMMM Imagine that.....
You may be almost as well off not renewing. Just know that you would then give up your right to not be arrested and not be prosecuted and even have a shift in certain burden of proof to you. Not that that has meant dick up to this point but I do suspect that will be changing soon..... Somehow I got a feeling........
What a great weekkkkkkkkkkkk................. for alot of people......
Cops and prosecutors only want to try cases they can win...this ruling will result in fewer arrests. But the guys who push limits on count and weight, or who are sloppy with 'locked and secure' will still get busted...card or no card.
I hope you are right...
this is where i think you are incorrect.
the MSC said that it doesn't matter the plants count or other minor violations. this law's INTENT is to protect medical marijuana users from arrest.
you show a valid dr's cert. with a notary on it.
the case SHALL be dismissed and you were wrongfully arrested if they did so.
Across the state, patients have not been able to assert their rights under the Medical Marihuana Act because the Court of Appeals in this case misinterpreted the law," said Dean KOROBKIN, ACLU staff attorney. "This decision makes it very clear: A patient who uses marijuana to treat their medical conditions with the approval by their doctor should not be punished for mere technical errors regarding the number of plants or how they were secured.
Yup..I thought that it was pretty clear that you had to be in compliance with count weight and "secure', or you forfiet your protection.I don't want to be the first one to find out.
I religiously lock my stuff up.
That one COA ruling made it pretty clear we have to I thought.
I don't think this ruling changes any of that.
The Court didn't decide King except to say he had a Right to an evidentary hearing.
I still think King is going down.
Locked close facility is his only remaining concern. It will all come down to whether the dog kennel is judged as meeting the locked and secure definition....the biggest down fall being that it was not anchored to the ground, and could be lifted for access....time will tell.King has to show 3 elements at that hearing.
He can do that.......
What's not to understand?
Must not have read the supreme court ruling huh?Locked close facility is his only remaining concern. It will all come down to whether the dog kennel is judged as meeting the locked and secure definition....the biggest down fall being that it was not anchored to the ground, and could be lifted for access....time will tell.