ooof-da
Well-Known Member
That looks like it. thank you.With the angle to the bore and that style hammer, my bet is rimfire.
Smith & Wesson Model 1 1/2 - Wikipedia
That looks like it. thank you.With the angle to the bore and that style hammer, my bet is rimfire.
Smith & Wesson Model 1 1/2 - Wikipedia
Interesting- so that is a “1”…cool. #Learning19079 is toward the end of the first run...so this gun is from 1867ish would be my guess.
It doesn’t have any markings on the barrel, only those numbers on the very bottom of the handle. There are a bunch on small screws that I could take apart and look at some other “internal” parts potentially but it’s pretty small overall? Not sure, maybe I’ll take it down to someone to get more info. Thanks!Maybe a foreign copy of a S&W? S&W usually marked:
S&W No. 1
View attachment 5173076
S&W No. 1 ½ First Issue
View attachment 5173077
S&W No. 1 ½ Second Issue
View attachment 5173097
S&W No.2
View attachment 5173087
View attachment 5173089
Nahhh, not enough.This needs a .50 Cal mounted on top.
![]()
1942 Diamond T M3 Half-Track
Bid for the chance to own a 1942 Diamond T M3 Half-Track at auction with Bring a Trailer, the home of the best vintage and classic cars online. Lot #80,215.bringatrailer.com
You'll put your eye out kid..
![]()
An Official Journal Of The NRA | Exceptions To The Rule
There is no such thing as a typical gunfight.www.shootingillustrated.com