Gov shut down

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
That's not a lie.
Click to expand...
that is indeed a lie.

you have already admitted that no one told you those things, you just assumed them.

a much safer assumption is that you were rejected because you're a better fit for devryU.

you claimed you knew the socio-economic status of the applicant you were rejected in favor of, but you didn't. lie.

you said you knew the skin color of the applicant you were rejected in favor of, but you didn't. lie.

wipe away the tears, grow up, and own up to your lies.
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
that is indeed a lie.

you have already admitted that no one told you those things, you just assumed them.
Click to expand...
No one had to tell me anything. I looked at the statistics myself. I already told you that, you just chose to ignore it. Typical.

a much safer assumption is that you were rejected because you're a better fit for devryU.
Click to expand...
Right.

you claimed you knew the socio-economic status of the applicant you were rejected in favor of, but you didn't. lie.
Click to expand...
See point 1. I looked at the stats myself. Why do you keep ignoring that...?

you said you knew the skin color of the applicant you were rejected in favor of, but you didn't. lie.

wipe away the tears, grow up, and own up to your lies.
Click to expand...
Ok. Let's try this one more time: I looked at the stats myself.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
No one had to tell me anything. I looked at the statistics myself. I already told you that, you just chose to ignore it. Typical.



Right.



See point 1. I looked at the stats myself. Why do you keep ignoring that...?



Ok. Let's try this one more time: I looked at the stats myself.
Click to expand...
you made a very specific statement that you knew the race and SES of the other applicant.

you did not know that, you only looked at stats and made your own assumption.

do i have to draw you a fucking picture?

you lied.
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you made a very specific statement that you knew the race and SES of the other applicant.

you did not know that, you only looked at stats and made your own assumption.

do i have to draw you a fucking picture?

you lied.
Click to expand...
I knew from the stats. There is no "socio-economic diversity" category in college admissions. If you are white or Asian--even with substantially higher test scores, substantially higher GPA, etc.--you can be denied over someone less qualified to be admitted solely on the basis of race, for the sake of "diversity." Period. It is indisputable fact.

I understand that you dislike the fact, presumably because you're a believer in race-based affirmative action, but that's your own problem to deal with.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
I knew from the stats. There is no "socio-economic diversity" category in college admissions. If you are white or Asian--even with substantially higher test scores, substantially higher GPA, etc.--you can be denied over someone less qualified to be admitted solely on the basis of race, for the sake of "diversity." Period. It is indisputable fact.

I understand that you dislike the fact, presumably because you're a believer in race-based affirmative action, but that's your own problem to deal with.
Click to expand...
i'm not discussing affirmative action.

i'm discussing the very specific statement you made, and the fact that it is a lie.

you think you are being substantive, you are not. you are attempting to divert the argument away from your idiotic statement and into a more generalized discussion about affirmative action.

that's called baffling with bullshit, and it is all you have since you clearly can't dazzle anyone with brilliance.
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i'm not discussing affirmative action.

i'm discussing the very specific statement you made, and the fact that it is a lie.

you think you are being substantive, you are not. you are attempting to divert the argument away from your idiotic statement and into a more generalized discussion about affirmative action.

that's called baffling with bullshit, and it is all you have since you clearly can't dazzle anyone with brilliance.
Click to expand...
It's not a lie because you call it a lie.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
It's not a lie because you call it a lie.
Click to expand...
you're right, it's a lie because it has no truth value.

it's a lie because you backtracked from the original statement.

it's a lie for many reasons, but not simply because i say it is.

until you post a fucking rejection letter with them telling you the race and socio-economic status of the person you were rejected in favor of, it is a big fat mother fucking lie coated in lie sauce and double stuffed with lie filling.

do you want to have a tutorial on the conditional tense tonight, or perhaps a review of political events from 2004 when you were all of eight years old?
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you're right, it's a lie because it has no truth value.

it's a lie because you backtracked from the original statement.

it's a lie for many reasons, but not simply because i say it is.

until you post a fucking rejection letter with them telling you the race and socio-economic status of the person you were rejected in favor of, it is a big fat mother fucking lie coated in lie sauce and double stuffed with lie filling.

do you want to have a tutorial on the conditional tense tonight, or perhaps a review of political events from 2004 when you were all of eight years old?
Click to expand...
I'm not backtracking from anything. I stand behind my statement 100%.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you're right, it's a lie because it has no truth value.

it's a lie because you backtracked from the original statement.

it's a lie for many reasons, but not simply because i say it is.

until you post a fucking rejection letter with them telling you the race and socio-economic status of the person you were rejected in favor of, it is a big fat mother fucking lie coated in lie sauce and double stuffed with lie filling.

do you want to have a tutorial on the conditional tense tonight, or perhaps a review of political events from 2004 when you were all of eight years old?
Click to expand...
If he's the kind of friend you keep, I'd get something better than an axe..
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
too late, you already did.

that's fine, go right ahead.

that act will not instill any truth value to your statement.
Click to expand...
I didn't backtrack. Like I said, I stand behind what I said 100%. My conclusion was based on data and that's the end of it.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
I didn't backtrack. Like I said, I stand behind what I said 100%. My conclusion was based on data and that's the end of it.
Click to expand...
your conclusion was based on assumptions and your initial statement was a (very specific) statement of fact.

digging your high heels in won't change any of that, ma'am.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top