dude your really not getting what im saying at all.im not saying you need the blacklight too flower you dont need it at all.what im saying if you have a strain that takes 9 weeks two flower.well if you can make the plant photosynthesis and it still think its dark,it will do what it does at night and still photosynthesis as well cutting flower time to 5 to six weeks.now wont that be helpfull?
the blue lghts your talking about are not all the way blue.you have to use a very strong blue like a blacklight. you have us a bulb that exactly the color it says it is, not a blue tinted softwhite that plant growers use
EXACTLY! and thankyou!
But the plant is not photosynthesising when it's dark. Because it CAN'T USE THE SPECTRUM OF A BLACKLIGHT! Your wasting electricity. And your plant will not finish any faster. I don't think you read a single thing I posted..... Did you even look at the chart? Where's your light on there?
I dont care what the chart says lol.people need too stop that and be open to new ideas.I remember on one of my first grows before i knew about ph,i was growing 10 plants and my soil was not right, i got all 10 males no bull, well now I know to check ph close LOL. but wait,what about xx xy cromo,you have a 50/50 shot at get females you cant induce males or females.well thats a lie dont believe evrything you read until you see it yourself.
your right about that,but some people say the glass is halfway full. well I say the glass is halfway empty.I have done research through trail and error.i did not always have a computer when I was growing.anyway people say darkness makes plants flower they are right right right. but how does it measure this?it measure it by light it gets compared to darkness,who can argue.well if that is true,well then what spectrum is it? there is no freaking chart for that.you just have to try and see.from what i gathered from my mistakes and study its the red spectrum only that reads and miss when its dark.
Come on, seriously...Now your claim is that using your black light at night time cuts three to four weeks off your flowering time? Sure it would be helpful, but its not going to happen. Wouldn't it be helpful if I could fill my grow room with dreams and have them cut my flower period down to 4 days? If you have done your research and experimenting as you say, then you should be able to show all of us Einsteins your positive, repeatable results along with a control group that didn't receive the discotheque treatment at night to show how much of an improvement it makes.
until you try it and see for yourself please leave me alone. i have done this i have proof what do you have?nothing but hot air.when you try my theory then you can talk if not stfu
and why do i need a control we all know plants grow with hid or cfl.has anyone experimented with shinning different spectrums when the lights are off?ooooooooh well i have with plenty off trial and error i say 3 grows because they are my most successful grows with my theory
You don't have proof. If you did, why wouldn't you have provided it to shut us all up. You need a control to show that 2 clones grown in the exact same conditions, at the same time, will have quantifiable differences when only one is exposed to black light for the 12 hours of darkness. The black light has to be the ONLY difference between the two. Without the proof you're just a street corner preacher, shouting words out for whoever will listen.
I really want to believe you but where the hell is your proof? I don't see it on page one.
I've understood you for a while now, just disagree
He has done none, at some points he says this has been his experience with 10 crops, elsewhere he says it was 3... I don't even think he has heard of the scientific process, let alone know how to follow it. All I get from this is that he, with severely limited experience, and a few days of disjointed research on subjects for which he lacks the foundation to understand, decided he knows better than the thousands of PHD students who have dedicated significant time into education and researching the subject, as well as perform rigorous, statistically significant, testing, which are written up in peer reviewed journals all over the place. It's theories (for which ample data and testing exist already, disagreeing with him) that he's masquerading as fact.
THANKYOU EXACTLY!
And this shit made me laugh my ass off! Rep to tha both of ya's!