I was going through the Apollo thread earlier and noticed a few people going with 1 730nm. Is that even worthwhile? Whoever I decided to go with (have not heard back from Bysen), I was thinking a mixture of 3000k, 5000k, 630nm and 660nm. If Apollo, 2:3:4:6.
Hijacked from Feroled's site;
The Emerson Effect was observed using wavelengths of 630, 660, and 730. This is a study that is cited in nearly all modern plant growth studies that relate to the use of specific wavelength of red light and the interaction with far red and infrared.
Emerson ran a series of experiments back in the 60s where he exposed plants to lights at different wavelengths. The conclusion known as the
Emerson effect was that there are
two different photosystems (PS1 & PS2) involved in photosynthesis, which combine to enhance efficiency:
With PS1 and PS2 in play, The light excites the chlorophyll molecules at the reaction center and causes an increase in energy. As the molecule becomes less excited, its energy is transported through a chain of electron carriers to the next photosystem which does much the same thing and produces energy-carrying organic molecules.
The best way to achieve the Emerson effect is by using an infrared (or nearfarred) wavelength of above 700nm in order to accelerate the interaction of molecular energy especially with the reds and deep reds: thus bumping up bud production.
2 6500k
1 430
2 455
1 630
4 640
4 660
1 730