sarah22
Well-Known Member
So i've been starting some paranormal research, and for practice, i take pictures here at home and analyze them, to learn the difference between true orb photos and just normal occurrences like dust. here are some things that the "experts" say about a TRUE orb photo:
" [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]So, the question remains, how do we know when it is dust and when it is a true orb? Dust tends to refract in a perfect circle with little "noise" in it and no border. By this we mean that the orb does not look like a cell under a microscope. Its make-up is pretty much a solid color without a defined border to it."
"[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]An orb caused by moisture will tend to have angular sides to it and its make-up tends to fade from solid to transparent. Once again it has no border. And like the dust particle, moisture can appear in one photo and not in another that was taken immediately afterwards."
"[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Now we're talking. Once you have eliminated the above possibilities, it is time to take a good, long, close look at the orb itself. What you are looking for in "orb" activity is a solid object that emits its own light. It will usually show up on film looking like someone just threw a ping-pong ball across the screen. If the orb has signs of movement, such as a blurred trail behind it, then you've got some rather solid evidence.
The other characteristic of orb activity that we consider is the coloration of the orb. True orbs are colored in the "cool" end of the spectrum, namely white, blue, or green. Any orb activity that shows up as red, orange, or yellow, it typical of dust, light refraction, or processing error."
This was taken from the TAPS website (http://www.the-atlantic-paranormal-society.com/articles/general/photo-orbs.html), I used the info there because a lot of people are familiar with TAPS. they're the guys from the ghost hunters show, and I really like that they are very skeptical and take on every case from a skeptic's viewpoint. So! if anyone has any expertise here or wants to help me debunk these couple things i photographed...please help! [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
the one with the mist really has me stumped...it was taken on a night that was fairly warm...i couldnt see my breath. and i wasnt smoking. i've never seen this in any picture i have ever taken and it has me mind-boggled...lol
[/FONT]
" [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]So, the question remains, how do we know when it is dust and when it is a true orb? Dust tends to refract in a perfect circle with little "noise" in it and no border. By this we mean that the orb does not look like a cell under a microscope. Its make-up is pretty much a solid color without a defined border to it."
"[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]An orb caused by moisture will tend to have angular sides to it and its make-up tends to fade from solid to transparent. Once again it has no border. And like the dust particle, moisture can appear in one photo and not in another that was taken immediately afterwards."
"[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Now we're talking. Once you have eliminated the above possibilities, it is time to take a good, long, close look at the orb itself. What you are looking for in "orb" activity is a solid object that emits its own light. It will usually show up on film looking like someone just threw a ping-pong ball across the screen. If the orb has signs of movement, such as a blurred trail behind it, then you've got some rather solid evidence.
The other characteristic of orb activity that we consider is the coloration of the orb. True orbs are colored in the "cool" end of the spectrum, namely white, blue, or green. Any orb activity that shows up as red, orange, or yellow, it typical of dust, light refraction, or processing error."
This was taken from the TAPS website (http://www.the-atlantic-paranormal-society.com/articles/general/photo-orbs.html), I used the info there because a lot of people are familiar with TAPS. they're the guys from the ghost hunters show, and I really like that they are very skeptical and take on every case from a skeptic's viewpoint. So! if anyone has any expertise here or wants to help me debunk these couple things i photographed...please help! [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
the one with the mist really has me stumped...it was taken on a night that was fairly warm...i couldnt see my breath. and i wasnt smoking. i've never seen this in any picture i have ever taken and it has me mind-boggled...lol
[/FONT]