littlejacob
Well-Known Member
Bonjour
I choose 3500k cxb 3590 because of the CD bin!
Have a great day ★
I choose 3500k cxb 3590 because of the CD bin!
Have a great day ★
You should read this thread for understanding why high CRI chips suck (for plant lighting, at the moment): https://www.rollitup.org/t/cree-cxa-analysis.743645/
Besides I only said it won't hurt to combine different spectra, but IF I was to do it I would try optimising the spacing to bring an even mix to the canopy, just like you wouldn't throw a spoon of sugar into your coffee without stirring. I also said I am not yet convinced by mixing (mono) spectra because of the labor and probably higher material cost, although I am generally interested in adding in deep red as long as it keeps up with the white cob's (red) efficiency.
I have to admit that my own lights have Vero 3500k and 3000K in it. That happened because I wanted to hit the "magic" 40% with the 3500K Vero 1.2 back then, which was also possible with the 3000K Vero 2.0 when it became available mid-construction of the second panel. I told myself that the 3000 3500 3000 3500 3000 bar was shaping the canopy in a certain way but I think it didn't matter, as the spectra are very close to each other. After all, I now favour an all-3000K version because of the relativly higher red, although I read reports claiming that even 4000K is delivering fine. There is a tradeoff between higher red and higher efficiency but it is probably negligible in terms of yield. A lot of people here now choose 3500K because they hate agonising over this dilemma.
Do you have a link to one of those monos ? I'm quite interested in this setup.Bonjour
I believe that he mean 5000k plus red (monos) runned soft...
Can you translate for the noob I'm am ? 60% efficiency (I guess) by running 5000k cxbs soft - and what about red ?
A light with 5ks driven at 350ma are 66.4% and reds at 500ma are 45.86%,
Depending on the ratio you use.... you can come out anywhere in between
Mine is roughly 55.17% efficient. (8 5k, 19 660)
Those are garbage. If you look at the lumen output compared to the wattage, you are at about 80 lumen per watt. Just use Vero 29s if you are on a budget. If ran at 80 watts you are over 130 lumen per watt.
Appreciate the input, I know they ain't great but I would still like to know what drivers I would need to power them. Cheaper alternatives to the hlg range preferably.
Also how many vero 29s can I fit in series on a hlg 185h c1400 driver
Would I need one driver for each of those cheap cobs or could I string a few together.