hydromaster666
Member
hey everyone,
I have been searching everywhere and cannot find a definiitive answer. It seems to me that doing a 2 week flush starves the plant at a critical moment of its life, when it has the potential to pack on the most weight.
Doing an E flush entails cutting the stem at the base of the plant and putting it in water with an airstone. similiar to a rose in a water vase. This method only takes 3 days to flush the plant.
So wouldnt it be better to keep feeding the plant until the E flush? It would pack on more weight not being starved and all. Really want to know whether there iare any differences in final quality and taste of the bud between the two methods? If not, then the E flush approach with its higher yield would be best right.
I have been searching everywhere and cannot find a definiitive answer. It seems to me that doing a 2 week flush starves the plant at a critical moment of its life, when it has the potential to pack on the most weight.
Doing an E flush entails cutting the stem at the base of the plant and putting it in water with an airstone. similiar to a rose in a water vase. This method only takes 3 days to flush the plant.
So wouldnt it be better to keep feeding the plant until the E flush? It would pack on more weight not being starved and all. Really want to know whether there iare any differences in final quality and taste of the bud between the two methods? If not, then the E flush approach with its higher yield would be best right.