hahaha omg i just smoked a spliff reading the 6 page of this thread. U had me rolling hahahah oh god i love paranoid people. Don't change bro u keep people like me entertained
Inside Conspiracism
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
medicineman
New Member
54,000 I believe at the time, many more since, but not 500,000.
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
Get the fuck over it ....
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
shnkrmn
Well-Known Member
Just smoke a fattie, bro Things get hazy pretty quick.
Things get hazy pretty quick.Sky's have been fairly clear here for months..."What in the world are they spraying?" comes out next week.
Don't worry though...after I watch it, I will be sure to seek professional help for my delusional behavior
[youtube]49klFVb71eM[/youtube]
Unnk
Well-Known Member
lol apathy is back in style i see...
Since when is it a sign of psychological problem to show your right to dissent, or to speak out loud and inform other people who are uninformed. I'm glad you believe that some of these quote unquote conspiracy theories are actually fact, but please don't say we have mental problems because our brains and minds are open and set to the facts.
The term conspiracy has such a negative connotation. When actually to conspire means EXACTLY what we are doing now. Coming together for a sole purpose.
Just be open to things then one you have heard other than what the main stream media has to say and you take that information and cite and source it. Find out for your self if its true or not. The proof is in the butter. Point being this is not targeted specifically on any topic just a general guideline.
Since when is it a sign of psychological problem to show your right to dissent, or to speak out loud and inform other people who are uninformed. I'm glad you believe that some of these quote unquote conspiracy theories are actually fact, but please don't say we have mental problems because our brains and minds are open and set to the facts.
The term conspiracy has such a negative connotation. When actually to conspire means EXACTLY what we are doing now. Coming together for a sole purpose.
Just be open to things then one you have heard other than what the main stream media has to say and you take that information and cite and source it. Find out for your self if its true or not. The proof is in the butter. Point being this is not targeted specifically on any topic just a general guideline.
Exactly how they want it to be. By creating a phrase and giving it immediate negative connotations you can easily lump people into this umbrella statement and hopefully discrediting them completely. Although this doesn't always work...For instance this video of Art Robinson being interviewed by Rachael Madcow doesn't go down like she expected it to. She kinda gets her ass handed to her.
[video=youtube;BNVTFP9-iQ8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNVTFP9-iQ8[/video]
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i watched that live and i would say just the opposite.
the dude couldn't even defend the batshit insane cap he himself published.
he also does not know what sarcasm is.
Well I think he was at a loss of words for the proper euphemism for "Cunt whore bitch" but used "sarcasm" in its place. I thought he defended his points very well, after all the interview was about campaign donations not about things the professor wrote about 30 years ago and which Madcow takes out of context.
She is taunting him for the most part, trying to get him to admit something that isn't true with the spin she has put on it.
She is taunting him for the most part, trying to get him to admit something that isn't true with the spin she has put on it.
budsmoker87
New Member
all i see is 2 bickering children who never learned how to speak to others diplomatically
whenever this anti-social reporter is on TV i always see her trying to dig up dirt on someone or expose ppl out of context... there's a way to go about it...and her way makes her look snobby
she may consider it good "investigative" journalism, but i just see it as verrry strong-minded, unable to relax and rather childish
whenever this anti-social reporter is on TV i always see her trying to dig up dirt on someone or expose ppl out of context... there's a way to go about it...and her way makes her look snobby
she may consider it good "investigative" journalism, but i just see it as verrry strong-minded, unable to relax and rather childish
Hayduke
Well-Known Member
I thought his tactic of just continuing to talk was brilliant...though he just may be a bit dangerous...but what a bitch!!! How could anyone watch more than 5 minutes of her!!! 15 was brutal!
Quite distracting...stay inside...ignore the obvious...WATCH OUT! (don't look up)...SOMA DISTRIBUTION, LINE UP ORDERLY!...It's a Brave New World (order?)
And now for something totally different...
[youtube]MFL60wFIc_A&feature=related[/youtube]
Quite distracting...stay inside...ignore the obvious...WATCH OUT! (don't look up)...SOMA DISTRIBUTION, LINE UP ORDERLY!...It's a Brave New World (order?)
And now for something totally different...
[youtube]MFL60wFIc_A&feature=related[/youtube]
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
sexism for the win!
what was she trying to get him to admit that was not true? she quoted him DIRECTLY from a paper he wrote in 1995 (15 years ago, not 30, your exaggeration only shows your desperation to try to prove your point) where he tried to argue that AIDS was a hoax. she asked him REPEATEDLY if he still believed that. he NEVER answered.
all he had to do was say "no" or "yes".
there was no spin. she took DIRECT quotes from his newsletter which he published and edited. i guess to some people, that makes her a 'cunt whore bitch'. to me, that makes her a reporter/journalist with some good researchers working for her.
Unnk
Well-Known Member
lol direct quotes CAN STILL BE TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT lol
Anyone can take what some one says and turn it all around on them... This isn't journalism. Just like Micheal Moore got hassled for taking crap out of context even though they were direct quotes. They were still taken away form the surrounding information which validates, preludes or concludes a point of thought. Which is what out of context means. its like this A major investigation goes on saying i'm suicidal or something completely random. The media can take what i say and make it prove the point. I could say something " I hate my self in the morning or afternoon of the day after I dont shower." A journalist will take that and make it "I hate my self" "I dont shower" .... IE out of context
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
actually, what you said is 100% right. your argument proved it 100%
what i was getting at rather was that these were direct quotes from a newsletter he published and edited. it was not so much he said something jokingly which could be taken out of context, he wrote something seriously which was meant to be taken in context.
but you make an excellent point nonetheless. i will be more careful with my language in the future.
Hayduke
Well-Known Member
except for that it was removed from context...no need for joking...and it was meant to make dude look bad...the future is now!