Wow, you're stupid. Men were most often farmers, and women took care of the home. Until the mass entering of women into the workplace, it wasn't the norm for the sexes to work together in most daily tasks. This is common knowledge.
"DeParle 1994, pp. 3–4. DeParle's biographical article finds throughout Murray's life the persona of a high-school prankster who "only [learns] later what the fuss [is] all about" (p. 12). Some critics have found particularly revealing DeParle's discussion of the cross-burning incident and Murray's subsequent choice to not mention it. Murray and his chums had formed a kind of good guys' gang, "the Mallows". In the fall of 1960, during their senior year, they nailed some scrap wood into a cross, adorned it with fireworks, and set it ablaze on a hill beside the police station, with scattered marshmallows as a calling card.
Rutledge [a social worker and former juvenile delinquent] who was still hanging around the pool hall [and considers some of Murray's other memories to be idealized] recalls his astonishment the next day when the talk turned to racial persecution in a town with two black families. "There wouldn't have been a racist thought in our simple-minded minds," he says. "That's how unaware we were."
A long pause follows when Murray is reminded of the event. "Incredibly, incredibly dumb," he says. "But it never crossed our minds that this had any larger significance. And I look back on that and say, 'How on earth could we be so oblivious?' I guess it says something about that day and age that it didn't cross our minds"
That's what I could find about the supposed "cross burning"... wow, it sounds like he's really racist. Dumb ass.
Charles Murray is not a white supremacist, but his findings get twisted by people looking to denigrate people by race. Murray doesn't attend "white supremacist" meetings. You are a liar and an idiot.
Except I'm not whatsoever radicalized. I'm open to listening to controversial ideas because I'm not a closed minded troglodyte. There have been subsequent IQ studies done that show IQ is 60-80% genetic, and there are genetic differences across races. Genetic differences are both physical and mental. It also turns out that the differences within ones race can be equal or greater than the difference across races.You always skip over the parts that invalidate your idiotic ramblings for some reason and seem to keep pressing your dishonest and intellectual devoid ramblings. Weird.... it's almost liek you don't give a shit about facts and have a political agenda to push...... Weird again.
You seem to think people like Sam Harris and Charles Murray are claiming that if you belong to a specific race you are automatically less or more likely to be intelligent. This is your misunderstanding\incompetence to understand the English language.
You're forgetting that the APA tried to show Murray was wrong, and ended up confirming some of his findings.. I suppose the APA is racist too? Guess you can't use any of their data as they're clearly working with Murray to keep minorities down.
