UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you gloated about being on the white supremacist's side a month agonot interested
what happened?
why does everyone whose side you take turn out to be a white supremacist?
you gloated about being on the white supremacist's side a month agonot interested
still not interestedyou gloated about being on the white supremacist's side a month ago
what happened?
why does everyone whose side you take turn out to be a white supremacist?
"woops yet another one of my buddies turns out to be a white supremacist. oh well, not my fault. peace and love. nazis are very fine people and jews are hate criming themselves to make trump look bad. pray for enlightenment" - youstill not interested
He thinks I'm a white supremacist because I like some of these people and I think there is some legitimacy to Charles Murray's testing and it warrants further research.I have not read this thread, not sure who you are referring to. Have you ceded control of your emotional state to someone in this thread?
*cross burner charles murrayHe thinks I'm a white supremacist because I like some of these people and I think there is some legitimacy to Charles Murray's testing and it warrants further research.
View attachment 4261809 View attachment 4261811
I enjoy people from all walks of life's ideas, so long as they use their brains and not their emotions to construct those ideas.
claiming that some races were simply smarter than others or more prone to disease than others was how the nazis defended eugenicsHow many Jewish men are in the NBA? Do you think it's racism that's holding them back, or a lack of genetic gifts that make them ideal for a sport like basketball?
How many Asians get sickle cell anemia compared to black people?
How many Hispanic people get cystic fibrosis compared to Whites?
Is it racist to point out that some races are more resistant to disease or have better immune systems?
Does being at a higher risk for these diseases guarantee that you'll develop one?
How do higher rates of disease prevalence affect the average rates of infection within a race when compared to other races?
When you can answer these questions honestly and truthfully, you'll understand what Sam Harris was talking about.
How many Jewish men are in the NBA? Do you think it's racism that's holding them back, or a lack of genetic gifts that make them ideal for a sport like basketball?
How many Asians get sickle cell anemia compared to black people?
How many Hispanic people get cystic fibrosis compared to Whites?
Is it racist to point out that some races are more resistant to disease or have better immune systems?
Does being at a higher risk for these diseases guarantee that you'll develop one?
How do higher rates of disease prevalence affect the average rates of infection within a race when compared to other races?
When you can answer these questions honestly and truthfully, you'll understand what Sam Harris was talking about.
You think because Nazi's used racial experiments to try to prove some races were inferior, that anyone doing testing across races today has the same purpose. This is not the case, and data isn't good or bad it's how it's used.
You are an idiot.
Nah, he just doesn't like you. As best I can tell his moral authority to act like he does comes from a delusion that his beliefs are all facts. Let him be nothing more than a gnat to you.He thinks I'm a white supremacist because I like some of these people and I think there is some legitimacy to Charles Murray's testing and it warrants further research.
View attachment 4261809 View attachment 4261811
I enjoy people from all walks of life's ideas, so long as they use their brains and not their emotions to construct those ideas.
charles murray is a cross burnerNah, he just doesn't like you. As best I can tell his moral authority to act like he does comes from a delusion that his beliefs are all facts. Let him be nothing more than a gnat to you.
Your questions and statements are racial in nature and not racist. So reading a bit of this thread, it seems you are the OP Beefbisquit? May I ask why you have two accounts going? Just curious.How many Jewish men are in the NBA? Do you think it's racism that's holding them back, or a lack of genetic gifts that make them ideal for a sport like basketball?
How many Asians get sickle cell anemia compared to black people?
How many Hispanic people get cystic fibrosis compared to Whites?
Is it racist to point out that some races are more resistant to disease or have better immune systems?
Does being at a higher risk for these diseases guarantee that you'll develop one?
How do higher rates of disease prevalence affect the average rates of infection within a race when compared to other races?
Are all people across all cultures and races completely identical in all ways? In which ways are they different?
When you can answer these questions honestly and truthfully, you'll understand what Sam Harris was talking about.
So, you're saying that the scientists who have compared the genetics of races for differences in immune strength towards specific illnesses are wrong, and racist for doing their research that highlights differences in races?claiming that some races were simply smarter than others or more prone to disease than others was how the nazis defended eugenics
Clearly science is racist by nature as it defines differences that could be used for race comparison and anything that could lead to race comparison is by default racist and hateful.Or instead of building straw men we could let scientists do science rather than spam stoners with white supremacists doing pseudoscience
well at least you have your fat wife and tiny dick to comfort you, beefkittyClearly science is racist by nature as it defines differences that could be used for race comparison and anything that could lead to race comparison is by default racist and hateful.
Pointing out that white people have higher rates of cystic fibrosis due to genetics is racist. It's only a proclivity to the disease that would allow the higher rates, and we can't suggest that one race has health issues that another doesn't because that's super racist.
Pointing out that Jewish people are usually shorter than black people and usually aren't as athletic, DEFINITELY RACIST. In fact, the NBA is one giant racist organization, it's goal (I mean look at its membership) is definitely to keep Jewish people down and out of basketball. What other possible reason could there be that Jewish people don't permeate the NBA? It has to be racism. It is literally impossible for it to be anything but racism.
Asians obviously get sickle cell anemia as frequently as black people, if they didn't, to suggest their genetics allowed them to avoid this disease would obviously be racist and would immediately imply they're better than black people.
It's racism that keeps white people from being the fastest sprinters, to suggest anything else is promoting eugenics... and the Nazi's did eugenics, therefore suggesting differences between races makes you a nazi eugenicist by default.
All the data that shows on average danish people are the tallest nation in the world is clearly some scheme by racist, nazi doctors that aims to denigrate people from nations that have shorter people on average. It's so god damn racist I can barely get this sentence typed out.
Everyone is identical in all ways - physical, mental, and emotional. Literally. Every. Single. Way.... and anyone who thinks differently is a Literal Nazi eugenicist that wants everyone except their own race to be exterminated due to the others inferiority.
What a good read this was. I'm so glad you explained your side, Buck. Now I can live my life racism free knowing that there is absolutely no genetic, physical, or mental differences between anyone in the entire world.
Nazi's did science - therefore science is a nazi.
You're such a good person to help me through this trying time.
Corrected.well at least you have your fat dick and tiny wife to comfort you, beefkitty