cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
how many fingers am I holding up (and which one)?
Is Biden really that bad?
- Thread starter Jimdamick
- Start date
- Status
PadawanWarrior
Well-Known Member
If it's your ring finger you're barking up the wrong tree bro.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
One of Tucker Carlson’s producers described his audience as ‘dumb cousin-fucking terrorists' and they know their audience. Fox is for fools, have they offered a public retraction and apology to their viewers/victims? Shown any signs of learning a lesson or contriteness?I'll see your MSNBC and raise you a FOX.
Sen. John Kennedy says the only way to improve Biden’s budget ‘is with a shredder’
Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told "Fox News Sunday" that the only way to improve President Biden’s nearly $7 trillion budget proposal is with a "shredder."www.foxnews.com
MSNBC has far more respect for its viewers than to lie and spin so they can use them for their own nefarious purposes, but I guess fox thinks there is profit in brain washing bigots and morons. It is always easier to lead down than up, down happens fast and easy, but the climb upward is more difficult, it is hard for some to uplift themselves.
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
A fact check by the Republican ways and means committeeBiden does all those things, except maybe the Twitter part, but he doesn't write his own material anyways, lol. Just to take it one at a time, let's start with the lying part. I don't know how you can't see it. Just the other day he said it was Republicans who want to defund the police. WTF ever. At least the majority of the American public can see through his lies.
The seven biggest lies Biden told this week
President Biden’s State of the Union address was full of lies and mistruths. They betray the desperation of a president with 38 percent job approval on the economy, 16 percent of the population bet…thehill.com
Fact-checks | PolitiFact
PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.www.politifact.com
LOL
NO BIAS GREATER
I’m sure you could confirm it with Tucker Carlsen, Newt Gingrich or even Rush Limbaughs laptop
try harder !
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
How Reliable Is MSNBC? - The Factual | Blog
The Factual looks at how MSNBC performs in terms of creating factual, unbiased news and compares it to 240 other major sources.
www.thefactual.com
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
They aren't being sued for billions and don't call their audience dumb cousin-fucking terroristsHow Reliable Is MSNBC? - The Factual | Blog
The Factual looks at how MSNBC performs in terms of creating factual, unbiased news and compares it to 240 other major sources.
View attachment 5270112
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
the news on either is ok, but slightly biased...although i just refuse to support fux in any way.How Reliable Is MSNBC? - The Factual | Blog
The Factual looks at how MSNBC performs in terms of creating factual, unbiased news and compares it to 240 other major sources.
View attachment 5270112
When you get to the editorials on either, they both lean way the fuck to one side.
the only difference i can see is that Maddow doesn't have to make shit up, all she has to do is report it, although i do admit she does it in a way that is unflattering to republicans...she doesn't LIE...she just paints her picture from her perspective.
EVERY host on fox at night is a fucking lying foul piece of shit, who WILL fabricate stories on the spot, who WILL edit video to make false points, and who all admit lying shamelessly to their audience UNDER OATH...
i don't really watch either, but i'd trust msnbc way the fuck before i'd trust fox, for anything.
and a blog post is horseshit for corroboration...just saying...
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
LMFAO! Of course she lies. That's the whole reason that OAN sued her in a defamation case, when she lied and said that OAN was “the most obsequiously pro-Trump right-wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda.” The only reason that they lost the case is because the judges ruled that “for her to exaggerate the facts and call OAN Russian propaganda was consistent with her tone up to that point, and the Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context".
Rachel Maddow & MSNBC Beat One America News Network Again In $10M Defamation Battle
As the Ramones say, second verse same as the first ..at least when it comes to this partisan cable news legal dust-up
deadline.com
OAN loses appeal in defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld a San Diego federal judge’s decision last year to dismiss One America News’s (OAN) defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, arguing that the MSNBC ho…
thehill.com
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
She supposedly wronged Trump, OAN and Russia, I'm not shedding any tears.LMFAO! Of course she lies. That's the whole reason that OAN sued her in a defamation case, when she lied and said that OAN was “the most obsequiously pro-Trump right-wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda.” The only reason that they lost the case is because the judges ruled that “for her to exaggerate the facts and call OAN Russian propaganda was consistent with her tone up to that point, and the Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context".
Rachel Maddow & MSNBC Beat One America News Network Again In $10M Defamation Battle
As the Ramones say, second verse same as the first ..at least when it comes to this partisan cable news legal dust-upOAN loses appeal in defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld a San Diego federal judge’s decision last year to dismiss One America News’s (OAN) defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, arguing that the MSNBC ho…
Best you can do? Will fox win its lawsuit, considering how hard it is to sue a news organization?
It's like a Ukrainian shooting at a Russian and missing, then the Russian getting pissed, forgetting he invaded Ukraine.
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
Tucker won his previous lawsuit, which was very similar to Maddow's, and he won for exactly the same reason -- any sensible person understands that these folks are not news casters, they are opinionated propagandists. Anyone who takes either of them seriously, is not sensible, based on judicial decision.
You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers
Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.
wamu.org
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
Let's be real.. these guys are paid actors, nothing more.
www.businessinsider.com
WATCH: How Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow formed their chummy on-air relationship while working at MSNBC
Tucker Carlson once said he'd "pay cash" for a video of Rachel Maddow and Ann Coulter. Maddow joked about sending Carlson to Guantanamo Bay.
www.businessinsider.com
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
You can believe the facts Maddow tells you and being human she makes mistakes. She covers many stories by journalists and authors and has them on her show for interviews, no reputable journalist would sit down with Tucker, and he doesn't have or use the many references she does, she is a Rhoades scholar too and the actual author of several books, Tucker is a hack who sold his untalented soul for infamy. She doesn't need to lie to be a star, Tucker does though, and so does Hannity, it's why they got their jobs.Let's be real.. these guys are paid actors, nothing more.
WATCH: How Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow formed their chummy on-air relationship while working at MSNBC
Tucker Carlson once said he'd "pay cash" for a video of Rachel Maddow and Ann Coulter. Maddow joked about sending Carlson to Guantanamo Bay.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Maddow's viewers are educated and informed, Tuckers are ignorant cousin fucking terrorists, at least according to Tucker's staff, so you can understand the difference between the quality of the two. Fox fans are mostly Trump fans and believe him, so you can see why the folks at fox figured them for dummies and suckers, like people here.Let's be real.. these guys are paid actors, nothing more.
WATCH: How Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow formed their chummy on-air relationship while working at MSNBC
Tucker Carlson once said he'd "pay cash" for a video of Rachel Maddow and Ann Coulter. Maddow joked about sending Carlson to Guantanamo Bay.
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
Tucker is stupid, and so is Maddow.
Rachel Maddow’s Deep Delusion
This wasn’t simply mindless partisanship. It was a deeper delusion.
www.politico.com
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
I've seen her in the past. Remember, she did moderate some presidential debates in the past, and she was also terrible then. The news articles which I posted are from what's considered reliable sources.
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
POV isn't news. Fail.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
You are constantly trying to rationalize your feelings and need to look at a bigger picture than your personal biases and, in that picture, fox looks terrible and recently revealed what we already knew from our observations of their behavior. Now that behavior has legal and financial consequences and they won't stop with Dominion.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Well if the news is about J6, many had an opinion about that, an opinion most journalist share, treason and insurrection are bad and they said so while reporting the news. It's the same in Ukraine, there is no moral middle ground in reporting on Bucha, the disgust was evident, and I have no issue with it. Likewise with Trump and those who support him, for those with brains enough to blow their own fucking noses at least.
- Status