FeNuX791
Well-Known Member
Lol its all good man, no one has actually came back with an actual KIND led and failed and garbage. I haven't even been able to find a grow journal about them. There's been some positive shit said, and all of the "it looks like this must be this", (which is generally negative) but like the video I linked, the original kinds looked like area-51s but we know that still means nothing. I just don't get why they come in and still say shit even after I stated I would report the light as failed if or when it fails. Plus I bought it, it ain't your fucking problem lol. But, just like the guy said he works on electronics for a hobby, like that was supposed to mean something, but he's not an electrician, or engineer, just came bitched and left. But no proof. Hgrow posts pictures of shit that has no real validity(especially when he claims its the exact same light, even though the fuckin picture was labled apollo 6, and failed at trying to sell his shit lights, but keeps coming back for more.) Even after that comparison showed it had better par then the Lumigrow he said to buy one of those too..... Like I said man no one has shown an actual labeled KIND led as failed, just talking shit. Then the fuckin serials, are written in marker, but yeah man quality is something you're so sure about? lol . But, it's the internet and I made the thread so now i get the trolls. Im still gonna keep the grow going. Especially the par thing i still think that was funny http://growershouse.com/images/ALTEST_infographic_1.pdf especially with that showing they had a kind light at 22.85 in its par/watts ratio and the lumigrow at 14.4... oh yeah plus that fero which has to be a rebrand at 16.53. Still growing some lovely flowers for me, fixed my heating issues, using less power to cover my tent, so i still got what i was looking for in an LED. Haters gonna hate.
