researchkitty
Well-Known Member
I'd need four of those chillers, which is the same as 4000 watts of lights running. The chillers just chill a small reservoir of hot water to cold. They move so much water because they HAVE to because their water SOURCE is HOT water.Maybe I'm missing something kitty, but the chiller I was looking into a while ago has these specs:
EcoPlus 1 HP Chiller Includes:
* Fittings: 1”
* Dimensions: 16.5” W x 20.25” D x 19” H
* Weight: 88 lbs.
* Voltage: 120V/60Hz
* Wattage: 1080
* Amps: 9
* BTU: 12,000
* Capable of Chilling: -1000 gallons - 10° F -500 gallons - 30° F
* Pump Size: -Minimum 1584 GPH -Maximum 2200 G
That's a long way from 21gph and this little thing is only enough for a couple kw of lights.
Do you have a better way or have you underestimated water flow you would need from that lake? A chiller is just a heat exchanger hooked to an a/c unit so I would expect you'd need similar water flow for just a heat exchanger in a lake to draw the same btu's.
No?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/859c1/859c15ef4eed8846575673c55e4900a046f6675a" alt="Smile :) :)"
I believe my method is the smart way to do it. A chiller is a fix for someone who doesnt have a constant cold source.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/859c1/859c15ef4eed8846575673c55e4900a046f6675a" alt="Smile :) :)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/859c1/859c15ef4eed8846575673c55e4900a046f6675a" alt="Smile :) :)"
Instead of 4000 watts of power, which costs me $160/month, I can let a 2 amp pump do the job instead for a fraction of the cost. Plus, I save $1200 x 4 from chiller startup costs.