Gaius
Active Member
Good info. I wasn't aware of the history there.Bold statement
They are the same price $/watt, so don't get so excited. Apache is $2K for 685w of well backed and proven lights, and BML 333w for $1K from a guy who used to work for illumitex then ripped them off.
It might be a good 3x3 light, but I don't see it keeping up with a apache or a 1k hps in a 4x4, BML=20w/sqft , Apache=42w/sqft, 1000hps=63w/sqft
Let's not for get about the par outputs. BML says they get 2200µmols@12" when all bars are pushed together. What will it do when they are spaced out to cover a 4x4??? And are they meant to be ran at 12" or where??? and what lens angle is that measurement with? And what about the exterior coverage par readings??
EDIT:
Not that anyone could know how good an apache is since their website is probably the most lacking of any. But I own a few and a meter so can see the numbers and results in person.
It'd be logical to assume diodes spread further from each other could reduce photonic overlap, resulting in increased electrical efficiency. However, perhaps it is the density achieved with this overlapping light that actually benefits plants most?
I would hazard a guess that it's kinda like taking a bong toke vs sipping on a vape whip. Your lungs can only absorb so much, so with the bong you end up blowing out the majority of the THC. Is this true for plant growth, or is more light in a small area always better?